this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

news

24011 readers
788 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image is from Wikipedia's article on the war..


I've wanted to cover Myanmar for a while now but haven't had the needed knowledge to write much more than "This situation really sucks." After doing a little reading on the situation, I feel even more confused. A decent analogy is the Syrian Civil War, at least while Assad was in power (though it's still pretty true today) - many different opposition groups, some co-operating with the United States, others not. The main government supported partially by an anti-American superpower, but who could live with that government collapsing if there are deals to be made with the group coming into power. A conflict kept going and exploited at least partially by the United States and other imperial core powers, though with plenty of genuine domestic animosity and desires for political independence.

Recently, the Myanmar government - the mainstream media uses "junta", which is probably accurate despite the connotations - has promised elections at the end of 2025. This doesn't seem likely to happen, and even if it did, how this would work in a country as war-torn as Myanmar is unclear. The government is losing territory and soldiers at a quick pace; they now hold only 21% of the country, though that 21% does at least comprise many of the cities. It's difficult to get a handle on the number of people affected because civil wars and insurgencies have been ongoing in some shape or form for decades, but we're talking at least millions displaced and thousands of civilians killed.

Here's a comment by @TheGenderWitch@hexbear.net from fairly recently that covers the situation in Myanmar:

comment

The military government of Myanmar is losing to the Rebel Groups, and badly. https://www.voanews.com/a/myanmar-s-rebels-closing-in-around-junta-into-fifth-year-of-civil-war-/7958145.html

somethings really afoot though, news about myanmar from western outlets and channels have suddenly all remembered myanmar exists and written quite a lot about them in the last few days. Its suspicious, it could be capitalists trying to signal their want for US involvement in the civil war. It could also be a targeted propaganda campaign already pre planned in order to make sure people are clued into the conflict.

I think this seems to be another Assad situation. The Military government is pretty unpopular domestically and is losing quite a bit of ground. I would be surprised if they lasted to 2027. Supplied by both Russia and China, theyve been able to keep some flow of weapons, but are suffering a lot from manpower issues. Conscription has been enacted, but conscripts are a poor replacement for trained soldiers. According to reports, they only hold about 21% of the land and are losing lots of territory. They also have extended their emergency rule for another 6 months, throwing doubt on the ability to follow through with their 2025 election. They've lost large amounts of territory, thousands of soldiers, and 2 regional commands. They're not dead yet though, as they have some ability to retake some territory and win some battles, but again 21%. Rebels currently are making steady progress towards the second largest city in the country.

while I don't like the rebels, they are western aligned, they have popular support and are allied to many of Myanmar's ethnic minority defence groups. Im wondering who really has the power in this situation though, since many of the gains seem to be made by the Ethnic armies, not the NUG. This revolutionary energy could be fueled to establish a socialist federation, but won't, and the popular revolutionary energy is fueled toward the NUG. It'll probably be another pro-west bourgeoisie democracy. It will probably then turn against the ethnic rebels and we'll end up basically where myanmar was pre coup. Probably will have a strong military influence on politics as well, since the rebel forces seem to be made up of officers and very little political groups. By then, people will be extremely tired of war and more likely to accept any conflict resolution than another civil war. In the midst of "It Happened" stands a stronger, unmovable "nothing ever happens". Would be neat if the Communist Party of Burma could somehow come out on top, but they have only around 1000 soldiers and don't control a large amount of territory.

China's interests in the region are still secure, but siding with the Junta is a bad idea, one I understand though. China doesn't want a western aligned power to take over a china aligned state, and is trying to make sure their economic investments in the area are protected and their mineral income is continued. They have deep ties with many Ethnic Minority states, especially on their border, and the NUG forces, mostly again to protect infrastructure investments and keep the minerals flowing. They might flip back to the NUG as the Junta starts collapsing over the next year or so, especially since the new US administration seems to be really cutting back on foreign aid. The General in charge of the rebel government forces complained quite a bit about how much aid ukraine got and how much he wanted that aid. He was basically begging for anti aircraft systems "like in ukraine" lol. China could definitely swoop in and back the rebels, which while hurting their reputation, is probably the best move long term. China's only interest is to keep Myanmar from being pro-west, keep control of Myanmar's mineral flow, and protect other investments in the area.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Iranian President, Masoud Pezeshkian, to Trump: 'Now that you've started threatening us, I'll definitely not negotiate. Do whatever the hell you want. Trump is mentally challenged'

  • Telegram
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

I'm just going to comment on the leaked alleged "100 day US peace plan for Ukraine", because as events unfold, it is looking scarily accurate.

The leak was published first by Ukrainian outlet Strana Today, and dismissed by Ukraine as "Russian disinformation". But for supposed disinformation, it's looking more and more like accurate information.

So, according to the "schedule," Trump is said to be planning a phone call with Putin in late January or early February. In early February, he is planning to discuss the plan with Ukrainian authorities.

This has already happened. Trump had a phone call with Putin and communicated with Ukraine.

In February - the first half of March 2025, it is proposed to hold a meeting between Trump, Zelensky and Putin (a trilateral meeting or two bilateral meetings will be decided separately). The meeting should approve the main parameters of the peace plan, and then continue working on the agreement at the level of special representatives.

This happened, in two separate bilateral meetings in Saudi Arabia, albeit with delegations, and not Trump, Putin and Zelensky personally.

While negotiations are underway and hostilities continue, Trump does not block the sending of military aid to Ukraine.

From April 20, 2025 (Easter, which this year all Christian denominations celebrate on the same day) it is proposed to declare a ceasefire along the entire front line. At the same time, all Ukrainian troops must be withdrawn from the Kursk region.

We are here currently. A ceasefire across the entire frontline has been proposed. However, to help facilitate the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from Kursk, the US had to pause the sending of military aid and intelligence sharing to Ukraine. Now that Ukrainian troops have been removed from Kursk so that the plan can move forward, the military aid and intelligence sharing will resume, as it has been reported.

At the end of April 2025, the International Peace Conference should begin its work, which will record an agreement between Ukraine and the Russian Federation on ending the war with the mediation of the United States, China, a number of countries in Europe and the Global South.

I can see this happening. Zelensky is set to meet with the South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, this month, so that's the " Global South" participation there.

At the end of April, the exchange of prisoners will begin according to the formula "all for all".

Explains Zelensky's comments on a prisoner exchange. No comments on the "children kidnapped by Russia" in this leak though.

By May 9, the International Peace Conference is expected to issue a declaration on ending the war in Ukraine based on agreed parameters.

After May 9, Ukraine is offered not to extend the martial law regime and mobilization.

Presidential elections are held in Ukraine at the end of August, and parliamentary and local elections at the end of October.

This explains Zelensky's panic, and the posturing of certain members of parliament. Zelensky could be out of the picture as soon as August.

Now for the actual plan to end the war:

The proposed parameters of the agreement to be concluded within the framework of the International Conference:

    1. Ukraine will not be a member of NATO and declares neutrality. The decision to ban Ukraine from joining the Alliance must be approved at the NATO summit.
    1. Ukraine will become a member of the EU by 2030. The EU undertakes obligations for the post-war reconstruction of the country.
    1. Ukraine does not reduce the size of the army. The United States is committed to continuing support for the modernization of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    1. Ukraine refuses military and diplomatic attempts to return the occupied territories. But does not officially recognize the sovereignty of the Russian Federation over them.
    1. Some sanctions against the Russian Federation will be lifted immediately after the conclusion of a peace agreement. Some - over the course of three years, depending on Russia's compliance with the parameters of the agreement. All restrictions on the import of Russian energy resources to the EU will be lifted. But for a certain period of time, Europeans will be subject to a special duty, the proceeds of which will be used to restore Ukraine.
    1. Parties that advocate for the Russian language and peaceful coexistence with Russia must be allowed to participate in elections in Ukraine. All actions against the UOC and the Russian language must be stopped at the state level.
    1. The point about the European peacekeeping contingent after the end of military actions is highlighted as particularly problematic. On the one hand, Kyiv demands this as a guarantee of security. On the other hand, the Russian Federation is categorically against it. Separate consultations between all parties should be held on this point.

There is already progress on point 1 and 4 (Hegseth - Ukraine cannot join NATO or take back the occupied territories). Zelensky also just made a comment on point 4, in line with not recognising Russian control over them, but carefully worded as far as not fighting back to take them anymore. The EU will likely be strong armed into point 2, 3 and 5. As for point 7, I could see peacekeepers from China and the Global South being used.

To be honest I think Russia will accept such a deal, if territory in the four oblasts not currently under Russian control is up for negotiation, and there are conditions set on arms supplies to Ukraine over the 30 day ceasefire. The big obstacle is Kherson city, though I could see Russia allowing Ukraine to keep it, provided that they get the territory in the other three oblasts not currently under Russian control.

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Ukraine will become a member of the EU by 2030. The EU undertakes obligations for the post-war reconstruction of the country.

I just don't see this happening voluntarily, so you're right that the EU will have to be strong armed into accepting a country they likely have no realistic plan to integrate (probably can't just plug that shit into the german car industry), it's not even a "when ukraine is ready to be fully integrated" situation it's BY 2030, if ukraine is still a shitshow that will need nearly 100% of EU structural funds to integrate that's gonna be hugely problematic for the EU, the process can also be derailed by ukranian politics (whenever that comes back).

Also who knows in what state the EU will be in by that time, austerity driven rearmament compounded by all EU money going to a single state would cause major issues to enough countries for a structural crisis

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah im not sure that the EU wants a Poland/Greece/Romania/Hungary in one packag

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's, like, its citizens for sure won't want that, and if there's a referendum on it there are a couple of countries which would vote against for sure (france legally used to have to have referendums on EU countries joining, but they've since ammended it so that it only needs a parliamentary vote), and its leaders do want it because they probably see themselves as world historic figures building the best thing ever, "the european project", so they're ideologically motivated.

Sadly since the EU isn't really a democratic institution for several reasons (including the kinds of elections it has) europeans likely won't have much say in the matter and ukraine will join in a sorry state with god knows what consequences. Probably more orban or georgescu like figures breaking the centrist party systems that still exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Number 3 is unacceptable. De-militarized Ukraine is one of the goals of the SMO and Russia has stated hundreds of times that all goals will be met

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

What Russia states, and what can be accomplished, are two different things. Unless Russia can get themselves in a battlefield position to demand the de-militirisation of Ukraine, there can't be any de-militirisation. Russia was last in this position in early 2022, which is why Russia demanded Ukrainian de-militirisation in the Istanbul peace talks back then. Getting into such a position again will either require a rapid collapse of the Ukrainian frontlines over the next few months (basically what happened in Kursk over the past few days, but across the entire front), or years more of war, with Russia grinding Ukraine down until Ukraine is forced to accept the demand of de-militirisation.

Given that the frontlines outside of Kursk are not collapsing and US military aid and intelligence sharing have resumed, is Russia prepared to fight the war until 2026, or 2027, or even longer until Ukraine collapses? Or will Russia accept the deal that they can get now, and try to negotiate some more concessions? That is the most important question to ask right now...

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Taster_Of_Treats@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Trump upped the ante on his annexation taunts saying the only way for Canada to avoid his attempts to torpedo the economy is for the country to "become our cherished Fifty-First State."

Very realistic opening demand, mister president. You are a master negotiator.

Trump placing 25% tariff on steel, aluminum after backing off 50% threat

And he's saying this in front of a Tesla, which he is hawking on the white house lawn. I'm sure Tesla sales in Canada will be great next quarter.

[–] Eldungeon2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

I love the idea of chuds putting themselves in debt to own the libs. Can't not see that back firing. Oh, I bought a 60k dollar piece of shit that's constantly breaking down and then the whole dealership services flop once the bubble bursts.

[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

If that pic doesn't capture the essence of neoliberalism I don't know what is. The president doing a sale on his front yard for a Nazi's government welfare project of a company and threatens the citizens who are getting hit by said nazi the hard not kick up a fuss

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't see how further cementing Tesla as the Nazi car like this was ever going to help sales

[–] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It will give them a boost for a week while all the chuds with extra $$$ buy one. Hannity just bought a Model S. But it is not looking good in the medium and long-term. Even Tesla fanboys were forced to cut their 2025Q1 delivery expectations. It will probably be a negative quarter.

[–] newmou@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Chuds becoming electric car enthusiasts would be a real treat lol

[–] blame@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Very realistic opening demand, mister president. You are a master negotiator.

The other idea is to make all the canadians US citizens and hope they'll move to Jacksonville or whatever and decide they like it so much they want to make Canada part of the USA.

[–] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

IMO the funniest thing about this is that Elon sucks at video games!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3lk7377cm2i2r Trump: "Schumer is a Palestinian as far as I'm concerned. He's become a Palestinian. He used to be Jewish. He's not Jewish anymore. He's a Palestinian."

[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Palestinian becoming an insulting term same, as Philistine

Time is really a circle

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And he only won because of an insult.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This isn't news, but I thought this was an interesting essay from a longtime nakedcapitalism commenter. the author is some retired euro diplomat. his blog is worth reading as you can tell he's been around the block and paying attention for decades. fair warning that the author is not some diligent communist, but he's fairly clear eyed. I'd put him in a similar ideological camp as Mearsheimer.

this article is about how europe deeply papered over the nationalist tendencies of individual countries/populations through the EU and NATO, the impact of papering things over on european security, and how modern EU politicians are not capable of dealing with the re-emergence of those same tendencies. it's an interesting perspective about the value of EU/NATO to europe irrespective of deterring the USSR/Russia

https://aurelien2022.substack.com/p/a-swan-song-for-europe

a few snippets spoilered below

spoiler

The disconnect between “peoples” and borders, inherent in the practice of self-determination, haunted Europe for the best part of a century. It was less the wars, cataclysmic as they were, than then fact that the wars themselves arose because there was no solution to the problem of many nations and “peoples” in the same relatively small space, with borders that did not reflect the distribution of populations. Thus, the wars of the twentieth century could not by definition “solve anything,” because the factors that had produced them still largely existed.

The atmosphere of exhaustion, fear and uncertainty that hung over Europe in the late 1940s, and led ultimately to the Washington Treaty, is often believed to be based on fear of the Soviet Union and its military power, but this is, at best, an oversimplification. Western leaders saw their countries and indeed their civilisations as desperately fragile, likely to fall into chaos at the first shock.

The Cold War, for all its occasional panics and the lunatic artificiality of its frontiers, was nonetheless a period of general stability. Decades of military integration, endless meetings and committees, joint exercises and personal contacts between leaders made the whole idea that these countries had ever fought each other seem bizarre. And for many smaller European countries, the presence of US troops was a guarantee less against the Soviet Union than troubles with their neighbours. .... In effect, a significant part of the European elite had decided that the nation-state, for all its theoretical attractions and its romantic image of self-determination, was simply too dangerous a construct to leave in place. One more nation-state war, and that would be the end of Europe. If certain things had to be sacrificed, so be it. Since it was scarcely possible to go back to the era of transnational Empires, it was necessary to go forward to some kind of supranational Europe (the details were hazy for a long time), where the differences among national groups could be contained, and further wars averted.

From this mistake followed another: that “divisive” factors such as history, language, currency, religion, national culture and so forth should be progressively downgraded and eventually done away with. The rich and colourful history of Europe needed to be sanitised because its events could be “instrumentalised” by “extremists” to deceive the common herd into wanting war again. “Mutual understanding” was to be encouraged by cultural and educational exchanges, although such exchanges had notably failed to prevent earlier wars, and anyway were mostly for the benefit of the middle classes: how an industrial worker in Stockport or Nancy was expected to benefit was never clear. The infamous Euro banknotes, totally anonymous as through dropped from Martian drones, are the most obvious example of this sanitising tendency.

The result, of course, was precisely to abandon large areas of culture and even everyday life to the control of the very forces elites were so frightened of. If an interest in history was to be encoded as a marker of the “extreme Right,” then very well, history would be recuperated by these very forces.

And this is where we are now. Of course this agenda can be and has been hijacked by those with cruder interests in profits and in a disposable and easily-moved workforce, but that kind of reductive thinking simply isn’t adequate to explain the excessive, and often pointlessly counter-productive, nature of so many initiatives from Brussels.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

What this boils down to, as Samir Amin put it during the 2008 global financial crisis, is the Europeans putting the cart before the horse, building all these "institutions" that require a nation and a national identity, before building a nation itself. You can't create a currency, a parliament, and even a military, before you create a nation unified under a national identity. There is no money without state, there is no political parties without state, there is no military without state. You have to build the nation with the institutions, they cannot exist without each other. But the Europeans have done the opposite with the Euro, the joke of the EU parliament, and now talks of an EU military, creating these institutions for a nation that does not exist. This is doomed to fracture and split up on previously existing national lines, because there has been no attempt to create a country for these institutions in the first place! The EU and it's associated institutions were effectively created to enforce end of history neoliberal capitalism and make socialism, in effect, illegal.

Samir Amin interview, part 2 of 3, highly recommend listening, only 9 minutes long

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›