this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
798 points (91.8% liked)

Political Memes

7773 readers
1861 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (17 children)

I always say neoliberals will affirm your identity and support your right to be who you are!... As you die in the gutter of exposure and capital defense force brutality. Sorry, free market forces! 🤷

You can't eat pride ribbons. You can't live in pride ribbons. A neoliberal is better than a scapegoating fascist, but so is an empty soda can. Neoliberals are also equally as effective as an empty soda can in opposing fascism, the inevitable outcome of capitalism when left to run amok instead of straightjacketed to serve society as it must be.

[–] DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Neoliberal doesn't actually mean " The newest Brand of liberal" NeoLibralist regimes historically have also been exceedingly anti-queer. The term was coined in the 80's to describe a burgeoning different brand of liberal government that focused on cutting spending by privatizing swaths of the government. Think Thatcher, Regan and the modern Republican party... See also the early Nazis who historically privatized huge amounts of government to pad the wallets of their supporters but the label was applied retroactively.

If they are getting rid of government services and outsourcing them to a private company that's "Neoliberal politics". You are right that they are effective as an empty soda can at stopping facism but that's because they are usually better positioned to assume power, give up on democracy and go fascist but they aren't the group you're calling out here.

Really the bar for what "liberal" means is a system with a basic set of rights of the person that cannot be infringed upon by the government, universal rights of the person to own stuff (though not all stuff) and a dedication to some kind of democratic system. Basically it's become democracy's basic format and practically everyone in government who isn't a fascist is some variation of liberal or at least playing by Libralism's rules. It's not a statement on socially progressive or socially conservative rhetoric. You're probably better off specifying " Social Progressives" if you want to be accurate to whom you're talking about.

It's kind of the same rules as "NeoClassisism" which isn't constantly updated to mean the newest thing. That term got coined to specifically refer to an art style that is now 300 years old. Neo these days practically never refers to anything cutting edge.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Look, what matters here is that everyone is included equally under oppressive capitalist movements which aim to drain of us of our lifeblood and monetize our very cells.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 28 points 3 days ago

The middle panel is entirely superfluous. Take that out and you have an accurate representation of both the GOP and DNC.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 46 points 4 days ago (18 children)

Can someone who identifies as a leftist explain to me what "neoliberal" means? I have no fucking clue at this point.

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 75 points 4 days ago (5 children)

'Free market,' market-oriented reform capitalism; think Reagan, Bill Clinton, any moderate or conservative before the trump era.

It has been the sole economic theory in power in the US since the 1970s, with more or less a sliding scale between more neoliberal (republicans before 2016) and less neoliberal/more classical liberal (Biden's and Harris's campaign messaging, not Biden's actual actions).

The reason it sounds confusing, especially in memes, is because you think dems and republicans have different economic theories behind their actions, when in actual legislative reality they're just more or less neoliberal, and the minute differences get overblown in campaign rhetoric.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 59 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The reason it sounds confusing, especially in memes, is because you think dems and republicans have different economic theories behind their actions, when in actual legislative reality they're just more or less neoliberal, and the minute differences get overblown in campaign rhetoric.

The funny thing is that it's Trump, of all people, who represents the first genuine shift away from neoliberalism for the US in 50+ years. That fucker is downright mercantilist.

Too bad it's a shift away from neoliberalism in the opposite of the direction the leftists wanted to go.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 40 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That fucker is downright mercantilist.

Also a fake populist. He says things that seem like he will work to benefit the working class, but completely lies to them and screws them over at every opportunity.

The imminent $6T tax cut for the rich and corporations will be Trump’s magnum opus.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

fake populist

AKA "demagogue." That's the essential difference between Trump and a populist like Bernie Sanders: Trump is a demagogue; Sanders isn't.

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It's a circle tho right. Eventually it will all spin back around? /s

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It has been the sole economic theory in power in the US since the 1970s

I'm not American so I may be missing some nuance, but I find it hard to say that, for example, Carter and Reagan shared the same economic policy, or Obama and Trump. Only by flattening away any nuance whatsoever would those be called identical.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

First of all, Trump really is very different. All these tariffs are decidedly not neoliberal.

Trump aside, though, Carter, Reagan and Obama really did share broadly similar policy with regards to free trade treaties and whatnot. The Democrats were better on support for unions, but not so much better that they weren't willing to throw them under the bus of cheap foreign labor.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

White Karens who drive around with awareness ribbons on their prius and chastise you for calling black people black instead of "African American" and really think that someone needs to do something about the current social crisis as long as it doesn't upset anyone or anything and as long as everything stays exactly the same, and as long as nobody messes with their investments. They secretly cannot stand people different than themselves and want to retire on a golf course.

load more comments (5 replies)

It mostly means a dedication to deregulation and free markets. More specifically, private-public partnerships. That is the difference between them and Libertarians or Anarcho-Capitalists, since Neoliberals see that the government needs to provide things like courts, military, police, etc. but want to insert private companies to provide government services (e.g. in WW2, soldiers cleaned and laundered the military's uniforms internally, now a private company will do the laundry for a military base at a 50% markup).

As all political ideology, in its original formulation, Neoliberalism was a deviation from liberalism, in the Vienna Circle, by its rejection of "political liberalism". It didn't believe in formal freedom, democracy, equality, etc. Real freedom is the freedom to buy and sell on an unregulated market, real democracy is the ability to vote with your wallet, and real equality is the lack of regulations protecting one group from another. This is why neoliberals of the 1920s and 30s were pro-fascist, since the fascists were so dedicated to privatization and repressing socialists and communists. Thus preserving the freedom of the market, even if later neoliberals want to walk that back.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"I'm a centrist"

Actually republican but doesn't want to admit it

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Neolibs: Half of those people should be women #blm #acab #pride

Ftfy

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Needs some awareness ribbons too.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I do wonder what the makeup of 100 people would have to look like to be perfectly (or as perfect as possible) representative of all demographics, every way we chop them up. Race, nationality, gender identity, sexuality, permanent disfigurement, financial class, whatever.

[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There's more than 100 possible combinations of race, nationality, gender identity, sexuality disability, etc, so you couldn't accurately represent the whole human population with 100 people.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I don't believe for a minute neoliberals would hold to that half women thing.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah you’ll get one board member, maybe, if they feel like it. The steps needed even just to reform capitalism to eliminate gender inequality are considered way too radical by neoliberals.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They sure love to pitch men against women and vice versa deliberately to silence worker rights movements and they're doing it in more ways than most people are willing to admit. Ask them to close the gender pay gap and a neoliberal will tell you about their women quota and how they placed a woman in a "leading" position (she has no power and didn't get a raise) and how progressive they are already. Ask them for a raise and a neoliberal will tell you how women have it worse than you. You're right in a way of course. It's a convenient diversion for them and nothing more.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Back when I lived in Britain and participated in the comments section of The Guardian, I had a local "Feminist" literally tell me that it was more important to flatten the 23% difference in income between the cleaning lady and the night watchman than to flatten the 30,000% difference in income between both of them and the CEO.

That very same crown generally focused on "breaking the glass ceiling" (i.e. get upper middle class and upper class women such as themselves into those 300x minimum wage positions) and I have never once read a concrete suggestion about addressing the gender inequality for the poorer social classes.

That last box of the meme matches exactly my own experience with "Modern Feminists" in Britain.

(Mind you, I lived in other countries and also met older Feminists and they're generally different and their version of Feminism is actually Egalitarian, though I've seen some young women were I live mindlessly ape this Anglo-Saxon neoliberal "Feminism").

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

HIRE 👏 MORE 👏 WOMEN 👏 GUARDS 👏

[–] MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social 8 points 3 days ago

Dios mio! (Draws a cross.) A LIBERAL!

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Finally a meme distinguishing libs and neoliberals

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›