this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
1047 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

14352 readers
3091 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] computergeek125@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Anyone else notice that a large flat rate box has the same limit and the post only counts a small flat rate box?

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

At what velocity are the box's dimensions and effective mass determined?

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 146 points 2 days ago (2 children)

USPS GOAT. Fuck privatización.

[–] TaiCrunch@sh.itjust.works 90 points 2 days ago (3 children)

But sometimes I have mildly inconveniencing experiences with the postal service in my extremely rural town that require me to navigate my extremely rural town's nearly non-existent public services so we should absolutely surrender complete control to Amazon

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 56 points 1 day ago

Private companies love the heartland and will work out of patriotism even if rural routes are less profitable! 🤡

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We recently moved in a very rural area. The rural carrier for our new route gave us a form to fill out, and by the end of the week we were receiving mail. UPS and FedEX on the other hand, wouldn't deliver to us for a month. USPS will carry our packages up our driveway to our steps; UPS and FedEX throw them in the ditch by the mailbox.

Also, did you know you can buy stamps, cards, and envelopes directly from the rural carrier? Here's a fun quote from the rural customer registration form:

Rural carriers maintain a supply of stamps, cards, and envelopes for sale. Additionally, your carrier will accept Certified Mail™, Registered Mail™, insure packages, and prepare money orders. Generally, rural carriers can extend practically all services available at a Post Office. Please purchase a sufficient supply of stamps and affix proper postage on all outgoing mail.

Imagine how bleak things would be if Amazon was running the show. USPS is truly the best

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Imagine how bleak things would be if Amazon was running the show. USPS is truly the best

I'm sorry you are only subscribed to Amazon letter prime, in order to get your packages you must collect them from your nearest whole foods or upgrade to prime plus.

We're sorry prime plus is not available in your service area.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I would expect better from UPS, and as usual the USPS surprises me with their quality.

I would think Americans of every political stripe would say the post office is the best government institution we have. That tells you that attempts to undermine them aren't in our best interest.

[–] SavageCreation@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You see, this one service does all things right but one of them irks me. Meanwhile this other one does everything wrong but has one thing I agree with. I'll switch to it.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Milten Friedman is the reason we are where we are today.

[–] neonred@lemmy.world 90 points 2 days ago (3 children)

8 5/8" x 5 3/8" x 1 5/8"

Don't write yourself off yet, learn metric.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For most of the rest of the world, that's about 219 mm × 137 mm × 41,3 mm

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For those of us that don’t use arbitrary made up units at all, that’s 1.35515609E+34 Planck Length x 8.477460474E+33 Planck Length x 2.555613997E+33 Plank Length.

Use real measurements. A meter is how far light travels in 1/299,792,458 of a second? Statements made by the utterly deranged.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Finally a truly universally usable measurement for everyday use

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I'm sorry but... Length and Units? Actually disgusting. There is only ONE thing that exists, and it is inversely proportional the base rate of growth in half of a circular degree about a complex orthogonal dimension.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's only in your head you feel left out or looked down on...

[–] Ediacarium@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

just try your best, try everything you can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

moving from Europe to America the amount of times I'm like "it's 12 3/8ths" to try to, yknow, join in, and everyone's like "call it 12 or 13"

motherfucker that's a huge gap!

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently neither of you are aware of how dense I am. ;)

[–] ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But do you fit into that box? 🤔

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

first, ya cut a hole in that box...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nothing one of those fancy new blenders couldn't handle.

[–] Zabjam@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

I have mixed feelings about this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 158 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Imagine shipping this tiny little box and it weighs 60 pounds. Poor mailman.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 105 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Last package of the da... Yo wtf?!?

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's the 32 KG mop all over again

Note: Above video is marketing for an exercise plan, but it's also funny to watch occasionally when he has new episodes. As far as I know, the weights are real, but they're always loaded funny in the videos. Max plates visually for the weight the dudes are lifting

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

He said "physically" which is wrong because Neutronium. What he possibly meant was "practically" in which Osmium would be the only element you can practically fit in the box since it isn't possible to synthesize neutronium at that amount or handle that much safely.

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

I guarantee that it is physically impossible to fill a cardboard box with pure neutronium. Is it physically possible to get over 70 lbs of the stuff in there in a stable, shippable manner? I don't know, and neither do you. It's certainly far, FAR beyond the capability of any technology on Earth, but I guess it might maybe possibly not break the laws of physics. I can't prove that though, and neither can you, so neither of us can actually prove the statement wrong.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If mailing 70 lbs of unstable particles that can't exist outside of a lab is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No you mean theoretical. As neutronium is a theoretical substance. To our knowledge there's no way to find it outside of neuron stars. It is therefore physically impossible, within our current state of knowledge.

It's highly unlikely, bordering on theoretically impossible to assume that mankind will be able to synthesize enough to fill a cardboard box with. Then the practical side says even if that was possible, there would probably no way a cardboard box could contain that (and a plethora of other practical impossibilities).

[–] Gtoasted@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Well, you wouldn't actually need to fill the box, just exceed the weight limit. And since neuronium weighing just 70 Pounds would have negligible volume, the problem becomes on of making a containment chamber that would fit inside the box.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That and the neutrons would rapidly undergo beta decay producing a LOT of free energy and other particles.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah there physical and practical reasons intermixed!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 100 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wait until I fill that box with quark-gluon plasma.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'll go one better.
A (non-spinning uncharged) black hole with diameter 1+5/8th inches (so it fits in the box) has a mass of about 2.3 earths.

(Near as I can tell QGP filling the whole box is around a ten billionth of that.)

Of course the box would Very quickly no longer be outside the black hole. QGP would also cause the box to no longer be a container in short order. To put it mildly.

[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 24 points 2 days ago

It would also reach its destination very quickly. Or rather the other way around. Free delivery.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s because all the packages have the same domestic weight limit.

Seems silly, but makes sense in the context.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Okay so I originally assumed this was probably due to some union rule or something like that. But I didn't find any reference to it in the NALC guidelines, anything in the USPS resources center (which is hard to use), anything in google searches, and the original employee documentation or spec.

I did find the USPS History section and it turns out they have someone whose job title is "Postal Historian", Stephen Kochersperger.

But, anyways, I found the address (not email of course haha) for the USPS history office so I have wrote up an letter and put it in the mailbox. I will eventually update yall

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is the case for most "Dumb laws": there's an outlier that becomes kinda silly, but it's not really worth the effort to change.

I saw one "It's illegal to hunt Blue Whales in Idaho". Because it's illegal to hunt endangered species in Idaho, and Blue Whales are endangered, not because legislators were super concerned about saving Idaho's whale population.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Neutronium... I am having early 2000s trivia website flashbacks! Wasn't a teaspoon of that stuff several tons or something?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 83 points 2 days ago

at a typical temperature and pressure, sure.

[–] fox@hexbear.net 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If you stuffed that box with neutronium then:

  1. Funny event: it's so dense the Earth itself is basically a thin gas in comparison and it immediately falls through the floor, the ground, and the mantle to oscillate around in the core.

  2. Funny other event: It's so massive it dominates gravity nearby and everything within a couple of meters gets turned into Cool Physics from aggregating onto an incompressible box really fast and hard. Maybe the nearby atmosphere ignites from being compressed into plasma against the box.

  3. Real physics step in and the neutronium immediately decompresses and the mass equivalent of an inland ocean in neutrons and angry high-energy high-mass decay products sterilizes everything through to the horizon with a gamma ray burst, also triggering massive seismic events from the blast as well as killing everything on Earth since the atmosphere is now radioactive and a lot thinner

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Could you create a device that would compress some substance to the extent it would reach this weight or is that impossible?

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Such devices exist, namely stars. Neutron stars are theorized to have neutronium at their core, essentially a soup of neutrons so densely packed that nothing else fits between them - in order words, the densest theoretical material (osmium is the densest material found on Earth).

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I believe that would be some form of fusion

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›