this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
59 points (94.0% liked)

Fuck AI

3379 readers
367 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ai did a shit job.

-Ex graphic designer

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe your trained eye can tell better than me but it looks to me that the homecraft name in the AI one isn't even centered properly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Did you seriously think the freelancer isn't capable of creating something like that? Like, do you think that FedEx uses their name with a hidden arrow in the "Ex" because they couldn't hire anyone to draw them a photorealistic delivery truck with a box on it or whatever? Microsoft can't figure out how to make a window with reflections so they use the squares?

The simplicity isn't an accident.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Right?!? I wonder what happens when the business with the AI logo has to pay for full-color printing for all of their materials because their logo is so visually complex.

This isn't an issue if you solely operate digitally, but a storefront needs signage. Advertising becomes much more expensive in process color than 1 or 2 spot colors. Most physical businesses need things like business cards, invoices, purchase orders, packaging, ...

A professional designer will usually create a 1-color or 2-color logo to use for some of those things even when you have a full-color logo design to use on the most "important" materials. AI won't give that level of service, for sure.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lol try printing that on merch, dumb dumb. That’s an awful logo. It’s really not even a logo, it’s a scene.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Reminds me of the very first Apple Computer logo:

They dropped that for a simpler logo, and then dropped the simpler logo for an even simpler one.

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I would love to see a parallel world where all tech companies logos were all this detailed and old looking

[–] cazssiew@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

IBM's wasn't nearly as detailed but I really like it too

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

And all the cases had wood paneling

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Morebranding than logo. Looks like a label from an old bottle of tonic.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tobis@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Considering they probably fed the left image into the ai to make the right image, it’s rather silly.

“I made this logo with only an ai model, and can-do attitude, and a logo.”

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I wonder if a fucker like this has commissioned a logo, fed an initial design through AI, and then refused to pay the initial designer.

[–] grayautumnday@leminal.space 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Especially since the magicsh*t ai version will be SO identifiable as a favicon

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I see an old-timey ghost inside a house silhouette.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

anyone with a year of design training will know why the right "logo" is a pile of shit.

anyone with a month of experience printing will know why the right "logo" is a pile of shit.

anyone who has had 5 minutes with genAI will think they're a design master when they create the "logo" on the right.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

I disagree.

Anyone who has spent a few minutes thinking about what a logo is and what it's used for will be able to tell you that one of these is a logo and the other is... a picture.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No experience in printing, but I guess its impossible to Print that Logo with that Kind of Detail in a timely manner without it looking like shit?

Also, everyone who ever heard about web design and hosting will know that such a picture is impossible to scale up and down, and also that picture will take up literal gigabytes since you can neither use normal PNGs because of the quality nor vector based art (they store the picture as mathematical equasions, so the PC has to render them, but it can be indefinitely made smaller and bigger without it becoming more pixely) because that sort of detail will just be impossible to render on grandmas smart TV from 2010, so you will have to store this picture as PNG in different formats as many times as you want to display that image

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

No, you understand the printing problem. Any logo needs a vector version so it can be scaled to any size. Lacking that is a non-starter.

And don't start me on the colors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let me curse in Church for a bit:

I like the AI image more. Why? Because this "flat and colorless" trend of Windows 8 going forward has been a fucking curse. Everything is flat and colorless now :(

I've read some comments here, and I can agree that the generated image is too complex, but the original design has gone too bland for my liking.

/cursing

Eh, I mean... Boo! AI Bad!

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

I work in an industry that deals with customer logos almost exclusively. I now get at least one person a week bringing in garbage-tier art they made in Canva or whatever that isn’t made to any standard at all, so they have tons of thin lines, gradients, blurring, etc. Shocker, AI only thinks about making it visually appealing when it won’t translate to a one-color, doesn’t have PMS tones to base it on, no simplified version, etc.

People think making a logo is just that. Just the image itself. They don’t think past what’s in front of them.

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In my experience, most people have simply never thought about it before. If someone decides they want to open a bakery and they have never had a business before, they haven't thought about everywhere their new logo will be used unless they get that expertise from someone. I've gotten pretty good at explaining these concepts to people and they typically respect my expertise and take my advice, but not everyone 😆

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I would think AI art would be perfect for the use case of “here is the general gist of what I want, now turn it into something usable”. I can also imagine basically nobody actually using it that way correctly though lol.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That being said, there are also thousands of logos that go through proper design companjes and they pay a lot of money out and get literally just the name in a standard sans serif font or abstracted until it is unrecognizable as a name like KIA or TVA.

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/62657cd22274f23af33a4b49/1651109120857-S6HF3QB80PZN8CSL96YF/image-asset.jpeg

https://digitalsynopsis.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/logo-redesigns-rebrands-worst-jaguar.jpeg

https://nataleerushurst.blogspot.com/2022/08/alphabet-company-history.html?m=1

https://1000logos.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AirAsia-Logo-history.jpg

https://storage.googleapis.com/ftidag_prod/activities/stad-gent-2/logoGent_c100.png

And the list goes on, Verizon, gap, tropicana, jcpenny, etc...

I mean, AI is trash, but it can also be extremely difficult to know if you will get a decent logo after paying thousands or tens/hundreds of euros spent (looking at you Belgium cities using millions of taxpayer euros for bad rebrands).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

"Guys I turned your Nike logo from a swoosh to wind blowing dust in a vague swoosh like shape also there's a foot there so you know where it came from and we'll stitch that on AAAAAAALLLL your products and guys... Guys? What do you mean I'm fired?"

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the modern-day equivalent of Frontpage/clipart

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 months ago

I get what you're saying (esp low-quality clip-art), though lots of clipart was actually vector art (like autotraced from physical art, giving some prominent styles) so would probably make for a better logo than what they generated here.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

That logo is terrible.

Like, a core component of a good logo is that it’s easily identifiable at a glance at all shapes and sizes and on various backgrounds… complicated photorealistic logos basically lack all of these criteria by default.

This is why you need someone experienced not some ai slop.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

Looks like they are missing the plot. Logos are supposed to be simple...

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

MagicShot.ai - Al Logo Geneator

Geat work

[–] Vytle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I would NOT support a business that has an AI generated image.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"I created" and "with AI" is the newest oxymoron.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Art imitates life

[–] viking@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

I don't like either, but the left one at least scales better for various applications across platforms and media.

[–] notarobot@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The one on the right is prettier (not necessarily better. I've read some comments by people that know more than I do with some valid points). However, to create the image on the right, they probably fed the AI the image from the left, made by a designer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Imagine the printing costs of putting variations of the right on all your products? Just the color variety alone would add to the production costs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] paperlibrarian@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

The Dunning-Kruger tool.

Mariana Lopez should have at least said which freelancer she got the sample from. What an insult to their work.

[–] classic@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

What is up with the weird soft look that so many AI images have?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s probably trained on a fuckton of Thomas Kinkade paintings, just statistically, since his output was so huge. He also had that kind of lighting going on, so it wouldn’t surprise me if that’s just baked into AI image generation now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›