this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
96 points (94.4% liked)

Fuck AI

2548 readers
818 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“Nothing will stop real artists from making art.”

Exactly. AI images are not going to eliminate art. They just make it more difficult for artists to compete under capitalism.

The solution is to abandon capitalism. Not stop tech development.

[–] mriormro@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How do you believe the idiom applies here? They’re not shitting in their hands. They’re actually building it.

[–] mriormro@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I meant in response to your solution of abandoning capitalism. Not that I wouldn't be overjoyed that we've done so but we've shown no real effort to impede it's continuous infection.

I'd rather we not fuck over artists in the meantime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Art is inherent in us. Just like the need to put boobs on mythical lizard creatures.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Drawing boobs is second only to the instinct to draw cocks.

[–] Rajkuhl@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If that Heavy Metal episode of South Park has taught me anything, it's that everything looks better with boobs.

[–] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait until people remember you can just hit the AI bros with rocks

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i say this as nicely as I can, you dont need expensive and exploitative algorithms to make art. i dont really care if you say you cant make anything, put a pen to paper and draw. your terrible scribble has infinitely more value than anything a tech company's software can generate using stolen data. and after you crumple that up and throw it away, get another sheet of paper and do it again, and again, until your wrist snaps apart, and I guarantee you will not only have learned something about yourself but you will be more of an artist than any tech bro using chatgpt

[–] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

People use AI for making “art” not because of their lack of ability to create art per se, but they use it rather as a way to cut costs in their commercial projects and skip contracting real artists. This is why it's malicious. I wouldn't care if somoeone uses it for pure, private leisure.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Relevant Oglaf (NSFW but not nearly as NSFW as this comic often gets): Dimorphism

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How about people who need a camera to create their art? Are they less of an artist than a painter?

I'm sick and tried of people re-hashing a discussion that has been settled for almost two centuries. Yes, photography can be art. There's art in how you use the tool. Not all people making photographs are artists or are even out to create art, and then it isn't art, and that's also fine. Why are people having such an issue applying the same to AI as a tool, saying not "Your shit sucks because it's AI" but "Your shit sucks because you're a hack".

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Cameraman is an artist, he does way better than ai piss bro to master his art genre.

It's 2025 and you don't know why AI sucks? At this point all I can recommend for you is to ask ai about it, you had time to develop critical thinking.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›