this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
1450 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

6872 readers
849 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 54 minutes ago

Therein lies the issue I have with modern streaming. When Netflix was the only game in town, things were mostly fine. Then I saw content I was actively watching disappear from the service, and research showed that this was due to licensing issues.

I saw the writing on the wall. Copyright holders were gearing up to make their own Netflix competitor streaming service. Which is exactly what they did.

When it all started, I dusted off my tri-point hat and got to work building "my own Netflix" and honestly, it's been amazing. A royal pain in my arse sometimes, but mostly amazing.

I have had the (dis)pleasure of dealing with some of the more recent streaming services, shortly before everyone started cracking down on "asking sharing" bullshit. I live in the same house as one subscriber, but I run my own network, and have my own Internet IP address, so I'm not in their "home" and can no longer use the service because of account sharing restrictions and related bullshit. Anyways.....

One thing that always grabbed me is that my own service puts all my recently watched shows that have new episodes front and center as soon as I open it up.... New streaming services either have that info halfway down the page, with the top of the page dominated by ads for new shows to watch, or whatever popular.... Meanwhile, I mainly just care about the show I've been watching and I want to watch what's new.... What a pain in the ass.

On top of that, I would have to memorize what service has what shows/movies, and if it's anything pre-streaming that's not part of a large franchise, like Star wars or Star Trek, or whatever, I usually have to look it up, or bounce between different services frantically searching for what I want.

No thanks.

The MPAA needs to take notes from the RIAA.... I subscribe to one music service and I never have any trouble finding what I want to listen to. ... Key takeaway: I subscribe to a music service.

I do not subscribe to any video streaming services.

Pretty much every film with the smallest amount of popularity can be easily, freely torrented in high definition. Netflix has good OG anime, not worth the price of subscription but still, whilst other platforms don't even offer that. Why give them money? Learn to use the interwebs!

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago

Reminder that your local library likely has many great DVDs. Not just the classics either. I was surprised to see my library had Dune part 1&2 and many others.

[–] midtsveen@lemmy.wtf 27 points 1 day ago

Arrr, me hearty! Batten down the hatches and prepare to set sail, ye scallywags!

[–] theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 17 hours ago

If its not on Roku, Pluto, Tubi, YouTube, then I'll probably find something else interesting enough to watch.

I go to theaters sometimes, funny enough.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

On your 13 PAID streaming services.

[–] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

Nah you shouldn't pay for 13 at once.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, you can't. It's $14.99 and in a few years you're going to lose access to it. Fuck you. Give us money.

...fuck you.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or the youtube route. You van buy the movie in sd or hd, but also, if you don't watch it on our cancer app on your phone, it's like 480p, sorry not sorry

[–] ShooK@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Arr matey. Easier now than ever.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 4 hours ago

I pirate everything, but i don't know how to pirate things in german for my nephew and niece.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Premiumize, Torrentio, Stremio.

The Holy Trinity.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can get it for free in your local public library.

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you have a DVD/BlueRay player that is

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean that's not a high bar too entry. I can find them for like $10 at tag sales, craigslut, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think we should be able to co-op a digital library... Say, the Internet archive seems to be just that!

Why is it under constant attack? Oh yeah, greed.

Why aren't we able to digitally host a communal library where each owner can "buy in" access by contributing a library?

Like a digital replication of each piece of physical media owned by a person?

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You mean private trackers? Fr those who are against piracy seem to be missing the point. For me it's about refusing to pay into a corrupt system where the creators get very little of what they make. The agencies get the majority. Which is why I pirate from Ubisoft, buy from Humble Bundle, steal from the corporations, purchase from the independents, donate to charities and exploit the greedy.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean as in everyone who owns a book could digitize it and contribute it to the library to be lent out one at a time?

Technically that's possible, but the real argument being made by rightsholders (such as the publishers suing the Internet Archive) is that they don't have the right to digitize it and lend it out, because that would be them replicating the work, and thus not just lending out the same copy, even if it's identical in practice in terms of how many people can access it, and what its content is.

Under current copyright law, you're going to be sued into oblivion if you try that.

Though to be fair, the main case being made in court that really holds water is that the Internet Archive lent out unlimited copies of digitized copyrighted works during the pandemic when many libraries where physically shut down and unable to offer books. Practically speaking, they did the morally correct thing by providing access to materials that would otherwise have been available, barring the extreme circumstances of the pandemic, but since the publishers thought they deserved to profit from that by selling every student who needed reading material in closed libraries a fresh copy of the book for $20, the Archive is now facing legal consequences, because that's technically still illegal.

However, if you want a communal library, you kind of get that with things like Little Free Libraries, where you can contribute any book, and books regularly cycle through the neighborhood over time, groups like BuyNothing, where you can very easily have people request and hand off things they no longer want themselves, including books, and you can always technically just start a local group that gets books and lends them like a traditional library would, although some libraries just accept donations of your used books and can lend them out without any additional administrative effort or separate entity set up in your community. That depends on your local library though, if you have one at all.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been out of school since 2017 so I don't know for sure, did publisher really drop textbook prices to around $20 during the pandemic? None of the books I needed to buy were under $100.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago

Sorry, I wasn't referencing textbooks specifically. I was moreso referencing the reading materials a lot of kids would want for things like ELA classes in middle/high school, many of which are often lent by larger libraries, since many schools can't afford to maintain 30+ copies of individual books for each class, especially if that class is reading multiple books per semester, and changing books entirely every year.

Most schools now rely on digital interfaces for their local library like Libby, but of course, when physical branches are shutting down, you end up shifting all physical demand to digital demand as well, which exceeded most libraries' capacities, since they could only afford to buy (on a subscription basis only) some of the ebook licenses that publishers sell in the quantities required.

I believe textbooks may have been implicated, but I don't believe it was the bulk of the books that the Archive made available.

[–] Taokan@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Everyone wants to run a subscription service, until they have everyone on a subscription. Then instead of celebrating that they won capitalism, they go and start with the exclusive extra addons and upgrades. Because unfortunately no company in the history of companies has ever said that's it, we're making enough money, let's relax.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

actually, plenty of companies say exactly that.

The thing is, they're small privately owned companies. not giant corporations.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 113 points 1 day ago (10 children)

There was a time when almost everything was on Netflix. As a consumer, having all my content in one place for $10/mo is awesome, but according to capitalism, it is a problem that needed to be fixed.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (15 children)

The crazy thing is loads of people stopped pirating and paid for a streaming service that was affordable, worked, met thier needs.

Now it's all splintered with corporations wanting a piece of the pie.

[–] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 2 points 19 hours ago

"Piracy is a service problem" - gaben, the OKish billionaire

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 180 points 1 day ago (56 children)
load more comments (56 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The Last Of Us season 2 being on a different, new subscription service is very much the last straw.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 90 points 1 day ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or even better, "even though you pay for the ad free subscription, this video is only available with ads".

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 12 points 1 day ago

Yo ho! Yo ho!

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›