this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
347 points (98.6% liked)

News

29047 readers
3801 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 43 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. They missed the part where they specifically and repeatedly said they were going to do this. Because American voters evidently have the cognitive skills of a fucking sea sponge.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 20 points 1 hour ago

A sea sponge at least absorbs something.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 53 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

One mistake Temu is making is showing it as "Import fees". That's correct of course, but they should label it specifically as "Import tariffs" or "Tariffs", so that it's clear what this is. From the comments in the linked reddit threads, a lot of people just think they're extra fees Temu is voluntarily putting on as retaliation, their brains still aren't making the link between "import fees" and "trump's tariffs on China".

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 hour ago

There are some brave businesses around here that have started posting signs.

"Due to tariffs, we've had to raise our prices."

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 21 minutes ago

Definitely needs to be "Trump's tariff" to be clear.

[–] Atomicbunnies@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 41 minutes ago

Digikey an electronics parts site has it listed on their stuff now.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

"Trump Tariff"

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 159 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

"Did I miss something?"

No, you intentionally avoided listening to what we were telling you.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 36 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If Mangolini weren't such an idiot, he wouldn't have revoked the de minimus exemption (meaning orders under $800 were exempt from the tariffs), then his rube followers would never have noticed anything.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Except for all the infrastructure inflation they'll pay for indirectly.

[–] abies_exarchia@lemm.ee 1 points 35 minutes ago

I’m not totally convinced that a huge swath of trump voters ever heard any alternatives to the propaganda that lead them to believe tariffs=good. Like i imagine a ton of them are structurally isolated from hearing alternatives the way social media and television works

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 96 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Donald J Trump is a liar, rapist, cheat and a lousy business man that has failed every single business, and Americans voted in this useless excuse for a human being to enforce facism, racism, and colonialism. Well done America.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 31 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You forgot sexism. There's a non-zero amount of people who simply will never vote for a woman.

[–] bdjukeemgood@lemm.ee 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

“Non zero” just doesn’t do justice to the sheer amount who won’t vote for a woman. Even among women voters.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago

I for one could never vote for a man to be president. Men are just too emotional to serve as leaders. Do you really want some roid-rage dude with his hands on the nuclear button? Please. Men are just too pigheaded, irrational, and obsessed with petty dominance issues to be trusted with real power. They're like selfish little children. Can you imagine it, a male president? The very idea is laughable! Only someone who knows just how hard it is to birth and raise a child should be trusted with the power to direct the military to take lives. Only women can really grasp the real stakes involved. /s

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 hours ago

6 times bankruptcy! He’s so bad that after the last one, no western bank would work with him at all. That’s when he went to Russian oligarchs for cashflow, and the rest is history…

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

Yeah chief, there was an election last November. Should have been paying attention.

[–] antisocialite@lemmy.today 90 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

It's only just begun. Wait until there are empty shelves at Wal-Mart. MAGA is going to have to work overtime to blame it on Biden.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 69 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

It's not hard work. They just blame Biden. When you're lying, and everyone knows you're lying, then there's no reason to put effort into the lie. If that doesn't catch on, they'll blame someone else. Zelensky or Xi, or they can always Blame Canada.

[–] dzso@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

The working overtime part is just so they can continue to feed themselves while they blame Biden.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 40 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Blame Canada you say? Oh my god.....South Park Movie predicted this....

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

"We must blame them and cause a fuss before somebody thinks of blaming us"

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"it's not even a real country anywaaayyy."

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago

“Shut your fucking face, uncle fucker”

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 25 points 3 hours ago

The local shipping port was empty yesterday. The last time I saw it that empty was during covid. It is genuinely frightening.

[–] Cryan24@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Doesn't matter who they blame.. blame won't fill the shelves.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 38 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can confirm - I track grocery prices every week and the cumulative "Biden inflation" was about 17% over 4 years, or about 4% per year average. Last week was already a 15% yoy increase, and some stuff is legitimately 100% yoy already.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

and some stuff is legitimately 100% yoy already.

It's 100% day over day -- or rather, 145% or even 170% day over day -- because that's what happens when you apply a 145 or 170% tariff to it!

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

“I haven’t been keeping up with news or what’s going on?!?! I have been ordering a lot this past month for my daughters wedding.. did I miss something???”

I mean Jesus TapDancing Christ. You've not been aware of who the president is and what he is doing??? It's not like tariffs haven't been in the news at all. They (along with illegal renditions and other attacks on civil liberties) have been dominating the news cycles since January. I have never been one to ignore news, so even if quite busy with something in life I read headlines at the very least. It confounds me to know some folks ignore news willfully. Some even think of it like it's some twisted badge of honor.

I know head-in-sand people exist, but I am dismayed, baffled and extremely disappointed that they still behave the same when the house is burning down around them. Especially when this ignorance is obviously present in a large block of people in the US.
Please wake the hell up everyone, the house is on fire! (I know I am preaching [venting] to the choir in this venue.)

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 32 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Oh I don't pay attention to politics."

Guess what, politics pays fucking attention to you

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago

politics pays fucking attention to you

What was that bullshit propaganda catch-phrase the right-wingers were spewing a while back, to bitch and moan that their abhorrent "values" of bigotry and hate were "under attack?" Oh yeah: "You Will Be Made to Care."

As always, yet fucking again, it was pure projection.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve tried to severely limit my intake since the election and just taken in enough info to have a foundation for context, I don’t need to see 400 alliterations of some doom and gloom headline, but yes, even in this fairly limited scope I’m WELL aware of the tariffs. It’s absolutely willful to be this tuned out

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Completely understandable to limit info for mental health reasons and I sometimes feel the same. This isn't that obviously.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 31 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes you did miss something you missed voting for someone that did not champagne on Tariffs.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 37 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

did not champagne on Tariffs.

Best I can do is Miller High Life.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 32 points 3 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

We fight The Beast back in The Holler!

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago

This went full circle very efficiently. Well done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Others were posting about possible workarounds, including the idea that perhaps Americans could get things shipped to a third country with lower tariffs as a go-between so that the goods didn’t appear like they were actually coming from China.

Truly maximizing global shipping efficiency...

[–] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly and logically, this is transshipment and if done to evade taxes by obfuscating place of origin, it is illegal. From what I heard, US customs does investigate that too, so it's not just an "illegal in theory but nobody enforces it" kind of thing.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Considering all of the other agencies that have had funding and staff cut, how equipped is customs right now?

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

If it means collecting more taxes and finding new excuses to send minorities to the El Salvador concentration camp, it will magically find funding before next week.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Last week, Trump went so far as to claim that Chinese President Xi Jinping had called the White House to negotiate a deal, another claim that Chinese officials deny.

How hard would it be to prank him by spoofing caller ID and pretending to be Xi?

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You don't have to spoof it. The fucking idiot answers unknown numbers.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

"We've been trying to reach you about your clown-cars extended warranty"

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 hours ago

I will never tire of reading articles like this. It's like the nectar of the gods to me.

[–] obscureprodigy@pawb.social 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

100% guaranteed these people are of two kinds: Trump voters and Conservative Libertarians

load more comments
view more: next ›