this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
17 points (87.0% liked)

Asklemmy

47759 readers
590 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Private property? Freedom of speech? Freedom to breed? Freedom of thought?...

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 minutes ago

A better world wouldn’t require sacrificing freedoms.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 1 points 24 minutes ago

Private property isn't a sacrifice. I don't own any.

There's a difference between personal property and private property. Private property is a mall, is a factory, is machinery at your workplace. Personal property is your toothbrush, your Playstation, your Television, your blender, your set of German knives, your computer, your books, etc.

Freedom of speech has never existed. The illusion of it has been allowed to be stronger or weaker in various places at various times, if your speech is no threat it's often allowed, it's when it's a threat that suddenly the freedom vanishes and hides behind excuses like national security or illegal ideologies, etc.

I question how you would get rid of freedom of thought without some sort of hellish brain implants being made mandatory so it's an odd thing to mention.

I'd be willing to sacrifice an awful lot of fascists, reactionaries, and an awful lot of enabling liberals. I'd be willing to sacrifice bourgeoisie. The expropriation of their private property is not a sacrifice but a necessity for things being held in common trust for the people.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

Private property. I don't actually want to own things for the sake of owning things, I want a stable and reasonably comfortable life. In the current system, the only way to reliably achieve that is to own the things you need in your life. But if the system were such that you could live a decent life without owning a thing, I'll take that.

And that is with the interpretation of private property as literally any possession you can own. If we go by the socialist interpretation of private property as property used to generate capital, I already have no private property and neither do most people here.

[–] LucJenson@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

I don't particularly want to be remembered for anything in my life. I don't need fame or standing. I dedicate my life to trying to improve people's lives as a teacher. I'd give my life if it meant everyone would live a significantly better life forever.

the ability to lie and "falsely claim".

imagine everybody is stricken with that boy's wish from "liar liar"

sure there would be a bunch of hurt feelings, but maybe the better world can compensate?

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Billionaires, to the god Quetzalcoatl.

I think we could sacrifice billionaires to Peppa Pig and it'd still get the job done.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm the guy dancing in this image

[–] TheGuyTM3@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

Hey can you tell me what’s the source of this please? Seems interesting

[–] wreckingball4good@lemm.ee 0 points 1 hour ago

I don't think a better world would include sacrificing those freedoms actually. That's some tankie shit.

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 9 points 5 hours ago

It won't be a better world if there's no private property or freedom of speech or freedom to breed or freedom of thought.

The instant these freedoms are forfeited, the world becomes worse.

[–] Nemoder@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Convenience.
Sadly it is something far fewer people are willing to give up than any of the above.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It really depends on the kind of convenience.

Some conveniences are easier to give up, especially if giving them up will benefit others.

[–] a_new_sad_me@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Example: if we are willing to walk around with smartphones that are 5mm thicker and 50g heavier, and a bit less slick in design, we can fix them instead of buying new ones. This kind of things. And we are not even willing to give that up.

This guy speaks about this (I'm not sure if this is the right video)

https://youtu.be/nrv45bvP8qo

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How much better we talking here?

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Super better. All the important stuff free and top quality. Moonbase.

I think we have more fundamental things to worry about than the cost of stuff.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago

I'll let you have my cats but you have to take both because they're family. And I get to visit.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

My car and my motorcycle. The motorcycle in particular hurts a bit more because that leans more into the sport and pleasure (cars do it for me too, but I like the MC more). I live in the US so no decent public transport for me. I'd have to walk about a half mile to get to the closest stop to my house. Closest drop off to my work still means another walk of two miles. Side walks are a bit lacking too. Not to mention that the scheduled for the bus is a bit too limited for what I need.

I love driving for fun, in particular on the MC, but that is getting to. Having to? That sucks and is kind of bad for the environment.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Trump.

Edit: QuarterSwede beat me to it, so I'll go for Musk as a close second.

[–] nicgentile@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Vanity projects.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
  1. The concept of a family
  2. Freedom to pick your own job (Government assigned positions)
  3. Ability for me to be anything above lower-class
  4. Nationalism and pride in a Culture
  5. Accelerated Global Warming
  6. My intelligence becoming below average
  7. Every human lifespan is halved
  8. Research of Space and Regression of Rocket Technology (forever sub-sound)
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not really a sacrifice if it's something you don't want

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Depends on your definition. It’s called a play on words.

[–] obscureprodigy@pawb.social 3 points 6 hours ago

emotionally, i want to say any and everything including my life, but i know that is merely talk until i have something deadly to face. however, i truly believe there isn't a single human rights issue not deserving of risking it all. but i am cowardly because i am fearful and insecure. i don't believe in myself although i try to. i have given up personal comforts for those i don't know and my friends, but am i ready to face something as severe as prison or being sent to a camp? i want to say "yes, of course," but.. idk. i know if our culture became more radical and revolutionary then i would feel ideological support from those around me and would be more willing to engage.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Would you sacrifice your sex hormones? No more estrogen or testosterone.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

everyone with a net worth of over $1 million

though i would do that for air miles tbh

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Nothing because there is nothing guaranteeing the better world would remain intact.

I'd give it 3-4 generations...

[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Low taxes when I become a billionaire

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Do you build your public order and happiness buildings first in total war games?

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Would you sacrifice your flesh? No more body. Brain slurped out at birth, wired up to the internet.

[–] SurfinBird@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

You’re not doing a very good job of selling it, but the concept has merit.