this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
793 points (98.9% liked)

Funny

9472 readers
2175 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 127 points 1 week ago (18 children)

We make logging companies "replant forests" (yes it's not at all the same as the old growth but it's something). Why do we let mining companies completely rape the land and replace nothing? It doesn't even look like they backfill with the unused debris, much less restore topsoil or plant anything.

[–] dreamless_day@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

Most of the forests in Germany aren’t truly old growth tho. Instead it’s basically all wood plantations

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

There are time lapses of this machines movement from satellite / aerial photography and you will see that the soil becomes green again.

[–] nfamwap@feddit.uk 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Here in the UK I know of lots of old mines and quarries that, because the ground is inherently unstable once the mining has finished, the land gets reclaimed as a nature reserve. Think nice walks, wildflowers, native trees, marshlands etc. A lot of effort goes into making habitats for insects, birds and animals.

Whether or not it is all paid for by the mining companies, I don't know.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

It isn't. I guarantee it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Well, not 100% on this, but maybe because we're an overaged society that elects corrupt politicians rather than accept that change in lifestyle is necessary? Or maybe it is the brainwashing of the Springer-press that continues to vilify the Greens. Maybe a mix of both.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago

They do backfill, but they obviously lose quite a bit of volume in the process, so they cannot completely fill the hole. The remaining part is usually flooded.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where I live they are required to rehabilitate the land afterwards, but usually that's after the mine has been running for like 30+ years and by the time they shut down, they do some weird financial trickery and declare bankruptcy despite having made millions in profits the previous decades and then they just walk away and tax payers need to clean up.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Honestly, that's on the government for not either levying the industry, or making them set up a fund to pay for that.

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It will be turned into a giant lake once they are done mining. You burn a lot of volume and filling it wil soil again is just not possible

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Bagger 288 is there to safeguard all mankind.

The Bagger 288 wreaks total utter devastation.

The Bagger 288 contains an artificial mind.

This mind is full of hatred, violence is its sole vocation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 67 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Being destroyed by a giant machine is terrible but it did file the proper paperwork first so what can be done at this point?

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago

Just enjoy the hyperspace bypass, I expect.

[–] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 10 points 1 week ago

There’s a lot to be said about dotted eyes and crossed teas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 53 points 1 week ago

Uhm no bagger-288 was created to protect mankind from godzillas and doom robots from the future.

[–] applemao@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago

ok I hate coal and fossil fuels, but this thing is so cool

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Alternatively, build a flying machine with TNT duplicators

[–] janus2@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

[ilmango intro music] 🥭🥭🥭

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j5906@feddit.org 36 points 1 week ago (10 children)
[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 42 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Those photos are from planes.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Probably, but the entire idea of "you can see it from space" is stupid anyways. Its only meaningful if its with the naked eye and the distance is specified. You can see anything from space if you have enough optical zoom...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

You can see people's backyard trampolines.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago

This is very real and has been an issue for years. I remember when I was younger, watching public TV, and I saw a news report about an elderly lady who was forced to sell her home along with the rest of her village so that they could dig up the entire area for coal. At the time it was a big deal, because she took so long to agree, which got media attention. It was incredibly depressing. It felt dystopian.

[–] CoffeeKills@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

It's crazy watching a time lapse of these massive holes move across the land https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz4a2WyAG68

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It is an engineering marvel, indeed, as it is the biggest mobile machine of the world.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Bagger 288 (and its sibling, Bagger 293) are probably the biggest machines which move freely on soil. They're about 225 m long, 96 meters tall and weigh 14 200 tons.

In the length category, the F60 overburden conveyor bridge (which moves on rails) is (was?) several times bigger, at 502 m length. It weighed less, however, at 13,600 tons.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

every rational part of my brain fighting the 7 year old me inside me who knows Bagger 288 is the coolest thing ever

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Looks like a Final Fantasy optional boss.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

It's a man-made Langolier.... slowly eating a dying world no one wants.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

Funny and sad

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

I love how I know the name Bagger 288 because of a 16 year old meme

load more comments
view more: next ›