this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38926 readers
172 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This should give pause to thought for all those promoting Firefox forks too.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What do FF forks have anything to do with that?

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Risk of forks of a FOSS project that turn out to have added a vulnerability I think is the point.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem here is not the fork itself tho, and it rarely is. The very obvious and openly communicated issue is the complete undermining of E2EE and sending everything to a single entity. Of course, very niche forks may have too few eyes on them to detect malicious changes, but that just isn't at all the current situation with the Signal fork.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 month ago

I’d argue security through obscurity was gone by 2000, for anything that can be pinged.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Was the Signal fork FOSS?

[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Interesting. Government record keeping rules require logging of many things. Normal Signal probably would not comply. This might.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At what point has this admin given a damn about rules?

[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mike Waltz was actually one of the more professional of the by in large clown show. He may have cared.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The TeleMessage website until recently boasted the ability to "capture, archive and monitor mobile communication" through text messages, voice calls, WhatsApp, WeChat, Telegram, and Signal, as seen in an Internet Archive capture from Saturday. Another archived page says that TeleMessage "captures and records Signal calls, messages, deletions, including text, multimedia, [and] files," and "maintain[s] all Signal app features and functionality as well as the Signal encryption."

Just don't even use encryption at that point

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt

Archiving communications is not optional (yet).

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Why the fuck are you cloning signal you idiot fucks?

[–] fireshell@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

But it's still a little better than Hilka Clinton's under-bed email server, or Hunter Biden's macpuke with pictures of his hookers that he just dumped in the middle of nowhere. Anyway, there's always been strife, which suggests that it's probably not accidental.