this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
247 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck AI

2780 readers
822 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Screenshot from May 16 2025 Nostr user Alex Gleason showing the AI added code to his app publishing his crypto wallets private key, which grants full access to the money in the wallet, via what looks like the JSON metadata of a Nostr message. It's followed by comments thanking him for the cryoto money and sarcastically asking him if he has tried learning programming.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raoul@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Is it the Alex Gleason behind Truth Social?

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

idk, could be an impostor. afaik you can put any name on Nostr. it's completely free speech, without mods etc.

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 10 points 15 hours ago

If you're going to blindly believe what AI gives you, that's what you deserve

[–] Damage@feddit.it 20 points 23 hours ago

The other day I had a guy stop me to ask how he could run the trading bot a friend gave him after he pasted it into chatgpt to have it modified according to his needs.

Chatgpt had output a PDF, according to him

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is "Vibe Coding" what we call using AI to write code without understanding how to code?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Can we instead call it something like "deadhead" coding? If the human is just filling a seat.....

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Yes.

But I like to call it coding for no-talent ass clowns.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. There are some people who will argue that it means any use of AI while coding, but the original meme was about using AI to code without even checking the code it gave you.

It was an obviously dumb idea meant as a joke, but somehow a bunch of idiots took it seriously and now we have shit like this.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I think even experienced coders will likely fall into the trap of not double-checking once they build more confidence with AI. But all it takes is one instance like this to eff it up so it's probably better to not get into the habit of coding with AI in the first place.

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm curious also, I thought they just get super doped up on drugs and start coding while feeling great

[–] twack@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's normal programming.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Feeling great while coding is not normal.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

While coding maybe not. But when it works and does what you want, the feeling is great

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yesterday i changed an open source pearl program someone made, so it made my life more comfortable and it felt awesome. from the git clone to the first launch it was pure bliss

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago

Well he deserves it anyways

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

Oh noez! You did a stupid thing with your stupid hobby and didn't check the output and then a bad thing happened?! How could anyone have known this might happen? Whatever…

[–] xep@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

Oh hey code is law so nothing to see here.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago
[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m getting annoyed with how this community is becoming an echo chamber.

Half of these posts are just people not using a tool wisely.

If this com had existed in the early nineties or 2000, you could have easily created similar content based on first time computer users or first time internetters.

“Computer genius found a way to clean up harddrive space by deleting all hidden files, now computers won’t start”

It’s this constant echo chamber creation that makes stuff like 45 becoming 47 possible.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 4 points 12 hours ago

Come on, the AI wrote code that published his wallet key and then he straight up tweeted it in a screenshot, it's objectively funny/harrowing.

Also the thing with AI tooling isn't so much that it isn't used wisely as it is that you might get several constructive and helpful outputs followed by a very convincingly correct looking one that is in fact utterly catastrophic.

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Alex Gleason is not a first time computer user

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He's probably written more code than most people on this sub, I sincerely doubt he'd be stupid enough to use his personal wallet for something like this, and not to clear out the wallet himself before drawing attention to it.

This is likely just an attempt to poke fun at vibe coders.

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

I don't think it's that either. Lots of people with programming experience have turned to vibe coding, thinking that since they have the knowledge they won't end up like other, less experienced users. Not everyone who programs enjoys the act of programming.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm inclined to agree. I mean, this case is a bit different, in that it's a person that supposedly could have done this properly taking a bad shortcut. But still, don't take shortcuts on money stuff. That's kind of on you (and what you get for cryptobroing anyway).

That's not to say it isn't impressive how helpful machine generation can be for trivial tasks where there's no security risk or a huge stack of dependencies. It's not even a bad way to learn to do it yourself if you are at that point where you can sort of know what you need to do but struggle to implement it.

It's weird to be in the agnostic region of this stuff because there's a bunch of garbage applications being incorrectly used or implemented I'd happily discuss, but I'm not ready to make cultish hatred for machine generated content a significant part of my personality.

But hey, Google has managed to make its spellchecker unlearn the difference between "its" and "it's", I suspect by plugging it into a language model. I'm not here to say it's all good.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But hey, Google has managed to make its spellchecker unlearn the difference between "its" and "it's", I suspect by plugging it into a language model. I'm not here to say it's all good.

Reminds me of 4chan figuring out how to mess with how Google was transcribing books when Google was effectively crowdsourcing transcription through recaptcha at the same time m00t had to add it to the site to combat spam bots.

Recaptcha would show two words, and with some practice it was pretty easy to tell which one was the one it already knew and which one was the "new" word it was looking for human help to transcribe. They found that it would accept any input for the "new" word. So 4chan users started using the n-slur, because of course they would, and they actually had enough people doing it to effect some books Google was transcribing.