this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
1182 points (99.5% liked)

News

30156 readers
5321 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several service members told advocacy groups they felt like pawns in a political game and assignment was unnecessary

California national guards troops and marines deployed to Los Angeles to help restore order after days of protest against the Trump administration have told friends and family members they are deeply unhappy about the assignment and worry their only meaningful role will be as pawns in a political battle they do not want to join.

Three different advocacy organisations representing military families said they had heard from dozens of affected service members who expressed discomfort about being drawn into a domestic policing operation outside their normal field of operations. The groups said they have heard no countervailing opinions.

“The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn’t the kind of national security we signed up for,” said Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative, which represents the interests of military spouses, children and veterans.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 4 hours ago

One day these guys will have to pick a side between their neighbours and the oligarchy.

[–] Omega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 hours ago

Maybe it's time to stop "just following orders".

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

I keep looking for cries for help on their shields.

I can totally see a scenario where they deploy but have protest messages on their shields, and maliciously comply to orders.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

They're welcome to come defend the American people from the criminal gangs known as the police and ICE.

[–] cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk 3 points 4 hours ago

This is quite funny, since pawns in chess literally represent infantry units.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean didn't a court just said this deployment is illegal? Just use that as an excuse and be like: "fuck this, I'm out". Like literally just start holding a poster and go to the protester's side.

[–] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

A judge ruled the troops can remain there for now.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 14 points 7 hours ago

Pawns of political games feel like pawns of political game? No fucking way, at this rate, they will get self-conscience faster than they predict it for ai.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I wonder if any of them have seen No Escape?

[–] Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

"I signed up to kill brown people in the middle east, not this"

[–] Razzazzika@lemm.ee 16 points 5 hours ago

That's not what the National Guard is for. It's meant to help citizens in times of crisis and defend the nation in case of invasion, not be deployed overseas.

"I signed up because I was too poor to go to college and had no other career prospects." Don't assume.

Killing brown people in the middle east - I sleep

Killing brown people in America - real shit

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

I signed up to kill brown people in the middle east, not ~~this~~ here"

FTFY

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 27 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

They should be feeling like shit. They are acting like shit and following unconstitutional orders. Grow a goddamn spine and frag any officers who give you unconstitutional orders.

[–] aaron@infosec.pub 3 points 7 hours ago

If you have been trained to follow orders under extreme pressure, in an organisation that has done exactly this stuff for decades overseas to 'other people'. And if actually you consider immigrants 'other people', how big a leap is it really?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

they also have a dilemma, if theyw ere to shoot a citizen, then once they get out of the military, people will know who shot them and then there will be constant guilt/harrasment, or doxxing eventually.

[–] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

The troops are not issued ammunition.

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 1 points 9 hours ago

The instant they shoot a civilian they are an outlaw. Outlaws are beyond the protection of the law. They are beyond the protections of the law. They are kill on sight.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 28 points 15 hours ago

Please. Please. Please. Come on boys, just read the Constitution, you didn't sign up for this shit.

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 36 points 16 hours ago

You got the choice to stand up and say no. No I will not use my weapons on my own fucking people because some geriatric PoS is having a terrible twos tantrum because everyone hates his ass.

Do what's right or be remembered as the ones who did wrong.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 18 points 15 hours ago

Now is the time for malicious compliance

[–] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They are upset that they are witnessing police tear gas their own community members and civilians exercising their 1st amendment rights, yet soldiers cannot use that same weapon against enemies… what does that say?!? STOP GASSING US! Stop with the rubber bullets! We have right and Americans need to stand up and realize this!

If there are no consumers, there is no capitalism! If all essential workers all don't show up ONE DAY… we shutdown America! We

THIS IS WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN, mass organized protests across the nation!!!

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly there are enough people who agree with it or simply can afford to protest, so too many scabs

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

If enough people protest, maybe those who can't afford to protest can at least legitimately say "sorry, there's a protest in my neighbourhood and I can't get to work."

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 52 points 19 hours ago

Maybe this will be what wakes up Americas military to the fact that everything they do is political. Apparently its harder to trick people into hurting their own country though so thats good to hear.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 108 points 22 hours ago (24 children)

Their orders are illegal, thus disobeying them is not insubordination or illegal.

[–] Necroscope0@lemm.ee 68 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Not just not subordination following them is specifically illegal and historically "I was following orders" has NEVER been justification or gotten anyone off their charges. You follow illegal orders YOU are a criminal as much as your commanding officer.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 17 hours ago

Unfortunately for the most part with only a few exceptions "I was following orders" has in fact, always worked to get people off scott free for war crimes except in cases where they were committed by a nation that lost the war.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 79 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They should be troubled. They are breaking their oath on the constitution.

On the other hand, they could easily turn and end tyranny before it really sets in.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 50 points 22 hours ago (18 children)

You say "easily," but I doubt it appears so easy, because disobeying the order first starts with you violating the UCMJ and paying for it. Only then can you fight and say hey, the order was unlawful. But you're doing that from military jail. It's an uphill battle and there's nothing easy about it.

I imagine the mindset is go, stand around with a shield, don't murk protestors, and try to just wait this shit out.

Plus, for the Marines, they were living in 29 Palms beforehand, so it's practically a vacation.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 158 points 1 day ago (31 children)

deploying military force against our own communities isn’t the kind of national security we signed up for

Then refuse those illegal orders and stand down.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 67 points 1 day ago (16 children)

As much as i hate what Trump is doing, I don't expect any enlisted man to refuse orders to go somewhere. The legality of that order is debatable, but following it does not cause any immediate harm. It's not a good risk to take.

Refusal to follow orders will come when the order is so clearly illegal that there can be no question, and when following that order is something that can't be undone. An order to fire into the crowd, for example.

Of course, no such order will be given. I assume we have all seen Andor, yes?

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Well, they should be scared if they're following illegal orders. You're not a pawn, you're a US soldier. Act like it.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

marines, not soldiers. soldiers are army

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Lol! Thanks for the correction. I don't know which term includes them all, but that's the one I should've said instead.

[–] ghostfish@lemm.ee 32 points 22 hours ago

The person who regularly hates on people who serve using them to attack the people they joined to protect? I can't image why morale would be low.

load more comments
view more: next ›