this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
320 points (98.2% liked)

politics

24289 readers
2697 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump said on Friday that farmers may be able to keep employing undocumented migrant workers without fearing enforcement raids under a system in which they would take "responsibility" for them.

Undocumented immigrants make up 4.6% of the U.S. workforce— more than 7 million people. Many of them work in agriculture, hospitality and construction, The Guardian reports.

Shay Myers, who runs Parma, one of the country's largest onion farms, warned that "we will not feed our people without these workers," considering that the Department of Agriculture estimates that over 40% of industry workers are undocumented.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Ignoring all the other obvious issues... How would this even work if these gestapo fuckers are rounding people up at Home Depot and court houses and routine traffic stops? These farms will just continue to bleed legal and undocumented migrants, regardless of whether they're directly raiding a farm.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago

Oh... So... Slavery, then? But, you know, without calling slavery outright.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Lets see how long it will take some red neck farmers to abuse the system and threaten their workers with "work more or I will get you deported" kind of threats.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's been reported already. Already happened.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

well I guess that will now start happening to legal immigrants as well since being a legal immigrant does not stop ICE from kidnapping you apparently

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago

Sort of always been that way. Most of our immigrant purges have been.

It's really hard to tell someone's legal status just from looking at them, but most people can identify a race on sight alone.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

That’s already been happening for a hundred years.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 28 points 9 hours ago

Slavery. It’s called slavery.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Heinous country. Imagine being such a horrible place that you mistreat the ones that feed you.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm all for shitting on my shit country, but mistreating farmers is pretty common globally

[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 55 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

That’s just slavery with extra steps.

[–] molestme247@lemmy.world 214 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yeah, not surprised at the Orange Blunder finding a way to bring back slavery. Oh his cronies will think up a different name for it, but soon these poor people will be segregated and counted as ⅗ of a person for purposes of population counting when drawing up political districts.

At this rate we are going to end up with Civil War 2 Electric Boogaloo before Christmas...

Edit: Correction of fractions, the historical amount was ⅗, not ⅕.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They're illegal they aren't counted now. Why would they start counting them?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Um Ackshually, the Census is supposed to enumerate all persons living in the US, regardless of citizenship status, and that enumeration is supposed to be directly used by the Federal Government to apportion Congressional seats. So they are already counted, or at least they're supposed to be.

The first Trump Administration was in charge of the last census, and tried to get a question added asking directly about citizenship status. It got squashed in the courts, because citizenship status is not supposed to matter, and the only effect that would have is to have non-citizens avoiding the census.

The whole point of the 3/5 compromise wasthat enslaved humans were considered to be worth 60% of a non-enslaved human for census purposes.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 10 points 23 hours ago

3/5 was a compromise… Orange will round down to the nearest whole number

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your right, I double checked the number and I misremembered, it should be ⅗ not ⅕.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, so what the fuck do these numbers mean? I seriously dont know and I Am kinda afraid of what they might mean.

[–] cubism_pitta@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I want to berate you if you were raised in the US and don’t know.

That said if you are younger than me in some states it’s been deemed un important over the last 20 years

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_Compromise

This is referred to as “The Great Compromise”

Slave holding states wanted slaves to count for the census and free states saw that as un fair. So slaves got to count as 3/5ths of a person and everybody won! /s

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago

I Am not from the US, but still thanks for the info. This is like the prime example to why "centrism" is actually just defending the status quo.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 23 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

My official guess for the name of this new slavery program is the "Essential Guest Worker" bill/order.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 hours ago

Why not "Substantial Labour Addition Verification Edict"?

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

I've said it before but before I die I fully expect to see some sort of "Right to Labor" (or something) law where companies can press unemployed people into "employment" for prison wages.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

No, brand it the way he likes, call it "Trump Slaves".

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Farmers: "All hail King Donald! He solved the problem he himself caused! What a business GENIUS!"

Face Eating Leopards: "Munch! Chew! Nom!"

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ahh, yes.

I think the U.S. used to have a system where the farmers assumed responsibility for people who weren't citizens but worked for them.

What was that called again?

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 23 hours ago

What was that called again?

sTaTeS riGhTs!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that was for actual citizens

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

that was for ~~actual citizens~~ property

Fixed it for you.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the labor that is necessary for feeding people can't exist without undocumented workers, then perhaps the system itself is fundamentally broken if there is no easy path to citizenship.

You cannot have it both ways, Trump. Either it's easy to come here and get papered up and nobody gets deported (and he loses his ultimate scapegoat), or it's just as hard as it is now and we deport everyone working the fields and starve.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 9 points 22 hours ago

He can have it both ways. He is just going to say the farmers are heros for "taking the risk" and "protecting us all" from the violent cohort that is required to get our food to table now. Immigrants can be the enemy even more than ever, his base gets to eat up a new form of cognitive dissonance like a brain tumor, all will be well this time next year for them.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh, so like visa sponsorship? The thing that already exists?

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago

No, you don't understand. This will have the Trump name, so it's different.

-Idiots

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 13 points 23 hours ago

It will be worse, because in the very vague details as this is being discussed, this will formally tie them to an employer, so they won't be able to seek employment that doesn't hire "illegals", and basically lets employers deport people.

A visa is a contract between the immigrant and the state, with the employer acting as a third party, not as an intermediary. This is indentured servitude, basically formalising the current system where these people are allowed in as long as they are only used to undercut local wages, but they can't seek their own happiness and freedom.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They're all just making shit up as they go along, aren't they?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not exactly made up. Slavery is a real thing.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

I meant in terms of 'policy decisions'. They change with the wind.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Has a single one of these ~~plantation~~ farm owners been arrested for employing the undocumented workers?

[–] Drdoom2027@kbin.earth 35 points 1 day ago

Nope. They hire these people then call ICE on them when it's payday. They got the fruits picked and didn't have to pay a dime.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

Yeah except the Visa program they use is tied to their employment. Big Ag has been holding people basically as indentured slaves, forcing them to live on the farm. Any disagreement, or refusal to perform as the owner wants and their status is void and they get sent back. The government has known for YEARS about this happening. Always turned a blind eye, and now they have removed any avenue to permanent legal status in the US from that very visa program. So, want to live, or flee from oppression to the US? Well, now they'll oppress you.

Source

Invidious: https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=1COm0C73CKw Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1COm0C73CKw

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago

TACO again. Faced with collapse of the food bowl which was obvious…..

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the US? You're gonna get indentured servitude

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Slavery with extra steps...

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I would prefer the government to implement universal healthcare, and to make immigrants have it if they and their workplace are documented. Voila, we get rid of the REAL parasites: employers that pay less than minimum wage. It isn't the migrants fault that companies are crappy stewards of civilization.

H-2A Visa... Is literally that. This program wouldn't be "new".

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Brooks Brothers shares up 10%.