this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
208 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24382 readers
3196 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Congratulations America. You found a way to make gun violence only the 2nd greatest killer of children.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Wait for the food shortages to push it to 3rd

[–] dinren@discuss.online 66 points 1 day ago

Would killing him be self defense?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US is speed running polio, meningitis, measles, whooping cough now!!! Has MAGA happened yet?!

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

MAGA - Make America Gilded Again.

Disease, poverty, brutality, and mediocrity, all to haunt our people once again.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Has anyone ever asked Trump what he would consider the perfect population count of the USA ?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think he's got a number in mind, just a hue.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I seem to remember hearing Trump speaking before a press conference saying he thought the US could do with just 1/3 of its current population.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it could, but we REALLY don't want it to. Certainly not with eugenics.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hows about we just take away vaccines instead ? That will kill many before they even get into kindergarten.

Because that is what is happening right now.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

About 100m according to others in the regime.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Marginal Griftees = Marginal Cost (Trumps Effort)

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Golly, I can't understand why younger generations aren't having more kids.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Now even if they do they will all die of preventable illness

[–] Buske@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Plus all the plastic in us. It transfers.

[–] Bonifratz@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

I would never have expected this from a secretary of health who eats roadkill!

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Soon at universities..... If I give the mouse this vaccine his polio is cured! ......Mr Johnson, please stop wasting this classes time and proceed with giving the mouse the Ginger tea for the research paper to confirm that it works. Remember, we already got paid to confirm it works and we have to tech the entire class how much the tea costs and where to buy it from in amazon!

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Where the hell is big pharma on this one. I can't imagine this is good for stock price

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Where the hell is big pharma on this one. I can't imagine this is good for stock price

You're not thinking like a psychopathic pharmaceutical exec: vaccines cure people for life instead of creating a lifelong dependency on drugs to survive.

vaccines are not good for the bottom line. I'm pretty sure the pharma industry absolutely loves RFK Jr.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There will still be significant demand for childhood vaccines among people who aren't vapid dipshits, and the price per dose will likely go up because people will be more desperate for them when all the outbreaks happen. Look at the demand for measles vaccines right now. 15 years ago, parents were like "Oh, yeah, I guess the kids probably need a booster maybe." Now, those parents are like "Oh fuck, we need a measles booster because vapid dipshits are trying to kill everyone!"

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But without FDA approval, you can't sell any vaccines. This is a direct attack on the health of US citizens.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Except that's not what they're doing here. That might be the next step, but this is just reevaluating the recommended schedule of vaccines for children and adults. They are going to make it optional, and parents won't be forced to vaccinate their kids to send them to public school. Most people will still get their kids vaccinated, but some communities won't reach herd immunity levels and children will die.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nah, you aren't thinking big picture enough. A person is ONLY valuable if they reach adulthood with chronic conditions. They need their customers to survive childhood.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I mean, that's everyone involved in this administration. The decisions they've made will have screwed over generations to come and the total productivity of this country has been shot to hell.

There is no way to look at any of these decisions in a good way.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh idk about that.. parents are willing to pay an awful lot in treatment in hopes of keeping their kid alive..

I think they need both, short and long term profits, you know?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They probably don't make a huge amount of money on childhood vaccines. The money is in chronic illnesses, diet injections and expensive cancer treatments.

In fact, they collectively probably would make more money treating measles cases than selling vaccines.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

expensive cancer treatments.

fuck, don't remind me 😣

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago

I'm sorry, they should be free. Only a sociopath would tell someone they need to pay $$$ in order to live.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

healthy people don't buy medications at exorbitant rates. the reason prevention is worth a pound of cure is because you're not desperate enough to buy them their fifth yacht.

Eradicating smallpox seems like a mistake now.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

258,000,000.