this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
722 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17245 readers
749 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

government of fragile masculinities

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

So wait... It's not Tiny Dick Syndrome?

[–] AskThinkingTim@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Enforcing polygraph testing will invariably make people less trusting of you. There needs to specific reasons that target specific people.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

As if anyone trusted Patel anyway.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

What a dork-ass loser.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

literally a 30 rock episode

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've never seen such a clear-cut case of fucking crazy eyes in a "man:"

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

That's drug induced and you cannot convince me it isn't.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

What a bitch.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago

should polygraph about his crazy eyes.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 119 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And you thought J. Edgar Hoover was paranoid.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is he short? Seems like a short kinda guy

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Haha body shaming much funny

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

5’9”, but I can see that Short Height Indicator Type all over him, some people call it being SHITty

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Cops and pseudoscience go together like chocolate and peanut butter.

For more examples, see "bite mark analysis," "911 call analysis," "blood spatter analysis," roadside drug testing with known false-positives, and even fingerprints (once the gold standard) have up to a 20% error rate.

And that's not even getting into how their methodology is exactly backwards: they have a claim that they set out to prove, but do no work to disprove what they already believe.

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago

but do no work to disprove what they already believe.

But that's the LAWYERS job /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Polygraph measures nervousness, not lies.

So innocent people fail them. And guilty people pass them.

All this does is make remaing people hate him

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (7 children)

People who use lie detectors as a machine they think can detect lies are stupid.

The real purpose of the lie detector is to trick the suspect into thinking it can detect lies, to the point where they confess.

Ancient trick. The voodoo magic chicken. "This chicken can tell all lies from truth, and it says you are lying." Who doesn't believe in voodoo magic? So the thief, knowing the jig is up, confesses.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] toppy@lemy.lol 37 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is polygraph test reliable ? Doesn't it fall under pseudoscience ?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron.

That and just looking for an excuse.

[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Lol right? This seems more like a "can you beat a polygraph test" test, than a loyalty test

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

It's more of an anxiety-detector. It has no basis in fact.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Real leaders don't need to be paranoid about what their underlings think about them. Fascism is more fragile than it appears.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“[Their] need for control is so desperate because it is so unnatural. Tyranny requires constant effort. It breaks, it leaks. Authority is brittle. Oppression is the mask of fear.”

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 20 points 6 days ago

The “original” snowflakes. “I can’t drink from the same water fountain as a colored person!” Type of people.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't FBI agents be able to pass a "lie detector" test? Has anyone told Kash they aren't actual lie detectors?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Polygraphs have always been close to useless even for normal people. Anyone being interrogated isnyoing to be nervous and likely set them off.

However, you have to be slighlty, remotely intelligent to understand that nuance. And that is not an affliction any Trump cabinet appointee has.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

Polygraphs provide authoritarians the excuse to get rid of people.

The same way that scientology uses auditing. The point is to instil fear and doubt into whomever you're measuring so that you can manipulate them.

So, they are extremely useful.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good thing polygraphs are junk science that doesn't work literally at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Damn dude that's some serious trump energy

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't the FBI trained to beat polygraphs though?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Only in as much as they know it’s bunk that only works if the participant believes it does.

load more comments
view more: next ›