Aaaand here we go again with the "that water may be vodka" strawman bullshit argument. You people cant even go 5 fucking minutes without bringing that out front and center because it's the only leg you can stand on.

[-] KingJalopy@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 months ago

Must be nice to have legs to stand on, I'm handicapped you asshole!

Not really, but if I was, you'd be an asshole, you asshole. Plus, anyone drinking vodka with a straw is an asshole, man.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago

All glasses are cups, but not all cups are glasses. Anyway this is more specifically a tumbler, and you can't prove what material it's made of.

[-] KingJalopy@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago

Oh yeah, can you drink out of the glasses on my face??

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 43 points 10 months ago

Ceci n'est pas une cup of water

[-] phorq@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago

When you call bathrooms "water closets" (salle de ban) you lose your right to have an opinion on water lingo logic

[-] Alcatorda@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I see what you're trying to say but "salle de bain" literally translates to bathroom ("room of bath").

[-] phorq@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it was late and I pulled the wrong translation like the dumb American with a vague memory of highschool French I am... I'm gonna do the American thing and double down that I stand by what I said!

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] bellly@lemm.ee 40 points 10 months ago

THEYRE PUTTING CHEMICALS IN THE WATER THAT TURN THE FRICKING FROGS GAY HNNGHGNGHGH

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Actually, what you're referring to as "water" is in fact GNU/water, or as I've taken to calling it, GNU+water...

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] DenialOfIntelligence@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This one is better Water

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

That GLASS of water looks like it can hold closer to 2 cups.

[-] Jimbo@yiffit.net 18 points 10 months ago

Wrong, it's vodka

[-] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

But doesn't vodka translate to "little water" in Russian? So, it's kinda water?

Hahahaha This was fun!

[-] kala_telo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

I think "little water" in russian will be vodichka(водичка), but they probably share same root

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago

This is what philosophy looks like to normal people: "Half full!" "Half empty!"

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] slugo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

This is clearly a glass of water.

[-] Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

That is a cup of glass. It is made of glass. It is a cup of glass that has water in it. Dumbass.

[-] Zeroc00l@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

In what universe is it a cup of glass and not a glass cup, or more simply, a glass (of water)

[-] Deuces@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

A glass of water is an absurd notion. If you tried to make glass out of water you would just evaporate the water. It would never solidify into glass.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 10 months ago

STOP BELIEVING EVERYTHING ON THE INTERNET. THIS FLUID MAY BE TOXIC AND YOU ARE IMPLYING THAT IT IS 100% HARMLESS.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] drkt@feddit.dk 14 points 10 months ago

That's a picture

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] don@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

That is not a cup of water, it’s a picture of a glass of glycerin.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

That's a glass, not a cup. Cups are earthenware/porcelain or even plastic, but not glass

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Wonder_Wandering@lemmings.world 11 points 10 months ago

Is anyone else struggling to justify to themselves why the fact that is not a cup, but a glass, despite it sharing all the qualities of what you would call a cup were it made of any other material? And doing this simply to assuage the cognitive dissonance of seeing something you have never and would never call a cup, being called one - despite having no tangible reason why it isn't one?

[-] roo@lemmy.one 9 points 10 months ago

Resolution from the 90s!

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] bigFab@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Still not a single genuine argument or discussion. I read all comments. Only bored ironic ppl 'making fun'.

[-] buffalobuffalo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago

i disagree

[-] mnoram@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

No you don't

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Teon@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

That is a clear, non-flavored liquid in a silica container.

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago

The cup is filled with dihydrogen monoxide

DHMO can cause suffocation, severe burns or accelerated corrosion, is the main component in acid rain, can create explosions in contact with some materials and kills 320 thousand people every year.

Dihydrogen monoxide is currently unregulated. This should change

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Speiser0@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago

5/7 full or 2/7 empty? Please tell me which is more pessimistic.

load more comments