185
House Republicans Introduce Bill to Expel Palestinians From the Country
(newrepublic.com)
We need to expel House Republicans from the country. They are a far greater threat to America than Palestinians.
Good fucking luck with that though. Voting blue is the only way to do that, but Democrats largely are not motivating younger voters. Republicans with their scare tactics and xenophobia and racism, really fire up their base, the best Democrats really do is "hey, we're not that" which I mean... Good, but they don't fire up people to vote.
Democrats suck at motivting young voters, cause young voters don't want to vote for some living archaeological site that supports bullshit like Israels fascist extermination campaign WHILE providing them the weapons to do it.
Username does not check out
Oh but it does.
Didn't all the pro-palestine groups just threaten Biden with no votes unless ceasefire? It's almost like he's not actually the problem. How does this factor in their calculations?
There's something about the middle east that makes everyone adopt idiotic self defeating positions often with a pinch of moral bankruptcy. Can't quite put my finger on it (jk it's organized religion and nationalism).
The natural gas under Gaza is also a factor
And decades of colonialism to establish a state able to project power for Western interests in the middle east
Did they twist their mustaches at the same time?
Domestic fascists took some notes from their buddies abroad.
(The note was, "but hamas")
That's a very misleading headline.
(The bill would) require the Department of Homeland Security to refrain from issuing visas or granting refugee, asylum, or temporary protected status to anyone holding a passport issued by the Palestinian Authority. It would also revoke visas and refugee or asylum status for anyone who was granted it on or after October 1.
Proposing a bill that stops new and recent visas is vastly different from wholesale booting all Palestinians from the country like the headline implies.
Still a shitheel move imo, but not mass ethnic "resettlement" the headline brings to mind.
Is this not a violation of the 14th amendment at all. What if some of the palestinians were born in america, even if the supreme court is radical, the 14th amendment is so clearly stated, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
It is clearly written, and they cannot interpret state being only states and not the federal government they must pass an amendment to overturn it, and it is clearly that the last line "Nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws", basicially states you cannot deny an american his right to being equal and does not state, if it is only state law and if they fuck with it, it could unleash all hell as now anyone could have there citizenship taken away by the federal government because of what nation they from.
Maybe just the ones who may be members of Hamas?
But yeah sure let’s codify the Muslim Ban into law (where I see this ending up).
Well, hamas is recognised as a terrorist organisation, the US is already probably arresting or deporting known members.
That’s what I thought, but I wasn’t sure if the policy was as explicit as something like “expel them all”. Maybe it is though.
I’m guessing it’s the same policy as with any other terror group. Prosecute them, jail them if guilty*
__
__
__
__
__
__ __
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ *Not always, look up Guantanamo bay. Most surveillance laws post 9/11 are really scary and give a huge amount of power to nsa and fbi to watch over any American without a warrant. Check Edward Snowden on Wikipedia for more information
Most surveillance laws post 9/11 are really scary and give a huge amount of power to nsa and fbi to watch over any American without a warrant
It's cute how it actually tries to let them spy on adjacent countries, up to 100mi past the border (or, most of the habitable part of Canada).
As if they weren’t already spying on every nation they feel like it by simply outsourcing that to google
I wasn’t sure if the policy was as explicit as something like “expel them all”
FTA:
The Safeguarding Americans From Extremism Act would require the Department of Homeland Security to refrain from issuing visas or granting refugee, asylum, or temporary protected status to anyone holding a passport issued by the Palestinian Authority. It would also revoke visas and refugee or asylum status for anyone who was granted it on or after October 1.
It would also revoke visas and refugee or asylum status for anyone who was granted it on or after October 1.
That's a fucking dick move
Thanks!
"Are you now or have you ever been in a terrorist organization"
They'd never think to lie right? Like, that'd be illegal something terrorists are very concerned about, and yet for some reason that question is on immigration, security clearance and gun sale background checks.
I'm quite sure there's a heightened background investigation for immigrants, but I like to make fun of the existence of that question.
Wildly speculating but... Having been a member of a terrorist organization may not itself be illegal. But submitting false sworn statements could be.
Well submitting false sworn statements definitely is illegal so you may have a point. Especially since it includes the "have you ever" part, instead of just currently.
So.... you may think it's stupid, and lets be honest, anyone who answers "yes' is pretty freaking stupid.
but there are plenty of absolutely dumb-as-shit people. Why not leave it in there and let some of them sort themselves out.
Oh yeah sure, it doesn't hurt anything to leave it in lol
“Are you now or have you ever been in a terrorist organization”
Probably end up with a lot of dumb fucks going "Hell Yeah I am, Brother! Trump 2024!"
The only time Republicans have ever spoken the truth.
Who was it who said "listen to conservatives: they'll tell you who they are" ?
"Are you now or have you ever been in a terrorist organization"
We even HAVE a McCarthy.
Damn.
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
185 points (96.0% liked)
politics
18790 readers
2813 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS