this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
366 points (96.7% liked)

politics

24832 readers
1867 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
JuBe@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
366
Can a socialist ex-marine fill Joe Manchin’s seat in West Virginia? (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Zach Shrewsbury faces an improbable task to replace the conservative Democrat in the face of a Republican onslaught – but he won’t be put off

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

The party can't find a candidate further to the right than Manchin, and Manchin isn't seeking re-election because he knows he can no longer win.

Moving to the right has failed. Even if Shrewsbury loses, and I'm so fucking delighted to say this, he's the best candidate you have. If he doesn't win, it's because centrist Democrats stayed home when they didn't get their first choice and didn't want to vote blue no matter who.

If he does win, centrists were lying about progressives not being able to win red states.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Centrists have always lied about progressives being able to win in red states. The key in WV (and most red states) is a heavy emphasis on worker power and advancing organized labor.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You forgot about gun rights. But nobody wants to talk about that... And I'll get down voted for mentioning it.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They would need to take a Midwestern stance on firearms most likely. Tbh a socialist would likely fit the role nicely. As the saying goes, "you get your guns back when you move far enough left"

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

May I ask you to expand on that? What stance do Midwesterners take on gun rights?

Also, oddly I didn't get downvoted.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The Midwest has a weird stance on guns in general. Even the most staunch liberals in the Midwest oppose "assault-style weapon" bans. The emphasis has been on raising the bar to ownership without heavy restrictions after reaching that bar.

From my experience, there's also a very healthy gun safety culture. I have some friends that are dumber than a box of rocks, and even they never touch their guns after any kind of drinking or drug use. The restrictions on using guns as a minor mixed with the very popular activity of hunting means anyone that has any genuine interest in guns has at least 5 years of training before they can even purchase a gun.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also, oddly I didn't get downvoted.

its a legit question. I also want to see the the parent poster says, but I tend to agree

socialist rifle association is a thing and I personally know strongly left of center peeps that are protective of their gun rights for all the obvious reasons you might care to think of. makes sense in many ways.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I think I'm just used to the other site and getting down voted for any mention of gun rights support.

I'm aware of SRA and dig what I've seen them do near Tucson. Maybe I should join.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Centrists have always lied about progressives being able to win in red states.

I hope he has direct funding from individual small donations. If he relies on party funding, they'll yank the rug out from under him like they did with Vallejo and then gleefully announce that progressives can't win.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I hope he goes to the DSA for funding. They're the best socialist org equipped to fund a campaign, CPUSA simply doesn't have the money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If he doesn't win, it's because centrist Democrats stayed home when they didn't get their first choice and didn't want to vote blue no matter who.

No, it means Trump voters refused to vote for him when enough of them were ok with voting for a centrist Democrat.

69% of West Virginia voted for Trump. You cannot win without at least some of them. We shall see if a self described Socialist can get enough of them but it doesn't look good.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, it means Trump voters refused to vote for him when enough of them were ok with voting for a centrist Democrat.

Already addressed that. Manchin's not seeking re-election because he knows that centrist Democrats' only strategy of moving to the right has failed.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

But you claimed that Shrewsbury losing would be because centrist Democrats didn't come out to vote for him and that's just not (necessarily) the case. Any Democrat needs all Democrats to win in West Virginia, but they also need much more than that. That is why a centrist Democrat like Manchin had a chance to win multiple times in the state. That strategy isn't "failed," it's the only reason we're even talking about a Democratic Senator from West Virginia.

If there is an alternative strategy that can win West Virginia as a Socialist Democrat, it would truly be unprecedented, that would absolutely cause a big shift for political strategy in the party. But a Socialist Democrat losing in West Virginia doesn't prove anything, that's the obvious outcome everyone expects.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

There's a fair few who don't vote at all anymore. Also, many Trump voters did so because it was a chance to get away from establishment politics. They could as easily see the same thing in a socialist candidate.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

West Virginia has pretty equal numbers of registered Democrats and Republicans (36.5% & 36.8% respectively) so this will be a battle over turn out and convincing the remaining voters. We'll see where his numbers are in six months.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

this will be a battle over turn out

And I fully intend to hold centrist Democrats responsible for their turnout or lack thereof. The party is as entitled to their votes now as it was when it was demanding progressives' votes for Manchin. And I'm not expecting the candidate to do a fucking thing to please centrists. They're not Republicans. That was enough when it was Manchin. Remember, progressives vote with the party 95% of the time!

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bernie took w Virginia over Hillary, I think if he raises enough money and communicates his message well people will respond to him. My gut says that Jim Justice will get the Republican nomination and he will be a difficult candidate to beat. He's won governor races as a Democrat and a Republican. Trump likes justice and Trump won west Virginia handedly. The odds are stacked against Shrewsbury but I still think he has a good chance if he can establish his own story and not let justice paint him as some crazy Marxist.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Maybe. But the centrists will need to vote blue no matter who, like they've been screaming at any progressive who is less than pleased with people like Manchin.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

If he doesn't win, it's because centrist Democrats stayed home when they didn't get their first choice and didn't want to vote blue no matter who.

Why do you think that?

West Virginia used to vote Democrat, but has swung pretty hard right in recent years.

The last time the state voted Democrat in a presidential election was for Bill Clinton in 1996, who got 51.51% of the vote. Obama only got 35% of the vote in 2012, and neither Hillary nor Biden got over 30%.

Currently, Manchin is the only Democrat left in statewide office. Everyone else either died or retired, or they switched parties.

Why do you think that the only possible explanation for Shrewsbury losing is centrist Democrats not 'voting vote no matter who' instead of Republicans outnumbering Democrats in the state?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

I doubt it, but I'm happy to see him try.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago

That would be amazing. Wishing this guy nothing but the best.

[–] loopedcandle@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think he's trying to be WV's John Fetterman. Good on him. I hope he can pull it off.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let's be honest. He'll need to be a lot better than Fetterman. Pennsylvania is much bluer than west Virginia and Dr Oz was a pathetic candidate. I really hope Fetterman is laying a solid reelection foundation right now because his reelection run will probably be more difficult. Jim Justice is known statewide, he's wealthy, and has won the governor's mansion as a Democrat and as a Republican.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I doubt PA will be more red in 6 years. It's always been a tight race, but besides Trump, it's generally been tight in the dems favor. When the GOP held onto Toomey in '16, it was because the dems put up such a shitty candidate (oddly enough, that's because Fetterman took the progressive vote and the most conservative dem won the primary that year)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think if Shrewsbury gets people out to vote, he has a chance. WV has low voter turnout, maybe its electorate could mobilize for a socialist.

I highly highly doubt it, but sure, he is precisely the type of candidate that should be running instead of Manchins.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Yeah don't use the S-word, but lean hard into workers reform, pro-union, safety nets, etc.

Basically run on those ideals but don't use that term.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Not if he actually describes himself as a socialist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nl4real@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Glad to see him running, but an incredible longshot with how corrupt our state politics are.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Sure. He can definitely win.

The idea that we exist on a political spectrum complexly misrepresents the political reality we live in.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Why would Patriotic Republicans vote for an Ex Marine who isn't backed by Corporate Interests?

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

*former Marine

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 years ago

God I hope so.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can't use the s word in West Virginia. Best you're gonna get is a corporate stooge democrat like Manchin.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Everyone hates it when I say it but if I had to choose between manchin and a generic Republican to be the west Virginian senator I'd pick manchin 100% of the time. I really hope Shrewsbury is successful. He'll need to raise money and he'll need to do well in the debates. There will be more Democrats coming into the race soon I imagine.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can’t use the s word in West Virginia. Best you’re gonna get is a corporate stooge democrat like Manchin.

This is the complete misunderstanding of American politics that the DNC and DCCC have been trying to convince us of since 2008, in-spite of our lying eyes.

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In your version of events, why did WV vote for trump by some 40 points?

load more comments
view more: next ›