this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
133 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Tuesday, Florida state Rep. Ryan Chamberlin introduced HB 599, a bill that would ban government employees from being required to use the preferred pronouns of their colleagues, prohibits the penalization of employees on the “basis of deeply held religious or biology-based beliefs,” and makes it unlawful for nonprofits or employers receiving state funds to require employees to undergo training on matters of sexual/gender identity or gender expression.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So I can go to work for the Florida government and call Ron DeSantis a she and if anyone complains, I can say it's because of my deeply held religious belief that he's a woman?

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Citing the fact that she wears makeup and high heels would also be acceptable, I believe.

[–] darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

And it’d be illegal to provide education on why conflating those facts is inappropriate

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Really they mean only THEIR personally held religious beliefs of white christian nationalism are valid and we all know Jesus hates trans people. It's in the Bible, or something, right after he tells the poor to fuck off with his AR-15.

Fun fact: right now, you can call up Miss deSantis and call them a punk little bitch and he just has to accept it. Let her know it's called free speech, and if they have a problem with it, then maybe don't be such a pussy.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Always remember: When something starts out as "to protect the children" (as dubious as that claim often is), it's always to get the foot of fascism in the door.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah they’re never arguing for free school lunches to protect the children

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 1 year ago

But they will argue for ending free school lunch programs.

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

You can already just be a dick and use the wrong gender for everyone. If you want to be a hateful bigot and use the bible as protection for your hateful views, you can. You can just be the awful right wing person you are, but people will not like you.

Stop voting for Republicans, all they have is hate turned into laws nobody wants.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biology based beliefs? Like the Florida state government employee who was fired for abiding by her sincerely held biology beliefs when she was publishing accurate Florida COVID numbers?

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/29/884551391/florida-scientist-says-she-was-fired-for-not-manipulating-covid-19-data

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well the Covid numbers weren’t oversimplified for 14 year olds biology so it doesn’t count. Same reason they’ll fire any government employees who follow AMA/APA/WPATH guidelines for trans people.

She should have used more pictures, I guess. Reading is hard.

[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

bill that would ban government employees from being required to use the preferred pronouns of their colleagues,

Ok, so time to just start calling EVERYONE by the 'wrong' pronouns...

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty much.

This "war on words" is so stupid. Like, say whatever the term the person wants to be called.

Didn't realize Florida reps is such snowflakes.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

They're not snowflakes, they're assholes.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope she understands what she's asking for

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every place I ever worked asked me what I wanted to be called. And calling people by the name they prefer is just a sign of teamwork and the ability to work together. (A valuable work skill) Who would want to call people by pronouns or names they don't prefer?

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The worthless #fascist symps that #DeSantis has installed in all the various agencies.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So as someone who deeply believes in the validity of trans people both on a religious and biological basis would I be exempted from being forced to misgender colleagues?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have been permanently banned from c/Conservative.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If they ban all the communists on here how do they expect to have anyone left?

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

...aaand the Republican mustache-twirling continues

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

The party of small government ladies and gentlemen or other.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Very on brand, as the core tenet of Christianity is being a judgmental asshole.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Cowardice at its finest.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this seems like it will fail spectacularly.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Dill pickle seasoning?

[–] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It is my deeply held biology-based belief that every Republican politician is in fact a giant cockroach from another planet wearing a human skin suit like Vincent D'Onofrio in Men in Black.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The law originally prohibited classroom instruction on issues of gender identity and sexual orientation in pre-K through the third grade.

In barring tax-exempt groups from conducting “any training, instruction, or other activity on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression,” the bill could have negative repercussions on nonprofits, medical clinics, and advocacy organizations that work with members of the LGBTQ community.

“Just like the original ‘Don’t Say Gay’ they make vague terms with large penalties to chill speech.

This latest attack is a continuation of DeSantis’s censorship agenda which attempts to erode our basic democratic freedoms in order to appeal to a far-right base,” Smith added.

Harding, who sponsored the state’s original “Don’t Say Gay” bill, resigned from office in 2022 after being indicted on charges related to Covid business relief fraud and money laundering.

Chamberlin, who replaced Harding via a special election held earlier this year, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Rolling Stone.


The original article contains 576 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

These disgusting qons just cannot help themselves, can they?