Given his track record, I'm kinda surprised he didn't claim that he's the literal, original Mary Magdalene.
He probably will next time he needs to raise some money.
Well, that’s his alter ego.
But...Mary Magdalene was never expelled or excluded, except perhaps socially due to what church tradition (not historical consensus) says her profession was. And in fact, the fables hold that she was a part of the effort that founded the beginnings of Christianity.
Also, Mary wasn't recorded as a known confidence trickster.
So, weird parallel to draw with your own life, you lying sack of meat.
“Within the ranks of the United States Congress, there are felons galore”
Well, he's not wrong. And like Cawthorn telling us about the Republicans doing cocaine and having orgies, he's in a position to know.
Yeah, but that's the thing. Everyone in the GOP already knew what Santos was about before he was even elected. They haven't told him shit. I have no doubt that it's actually worse that anything he's said, but I highly doubt he's going to take anyone down with him.
On the flip side, I wonder if they've told him stuff, but kept actual physical proof away from him. Santos is a known liar so any claim he makes would be tainted with the doubt of "is this another Santos lie."
They could hide what they are doing in plain sight with people shaking their heads over "yet another Santos lie."
My understanding is that Boebert and him have grown close, since nobody else talks to them.
lol trump called himself Mandela… every republican is fucking delusional
Calling himself a Saint is a bit more whacky.
Oh, is this what he meant? I just assumed he was calling himself a whore.
Mary Magdelene got erroneously mixed with two other Mary's (see her Wikipedia article if interested). One of them was a prostitute, not Magdalene.
I have no idea what he means by being the Mary Magdalene of Congress, other than they are both commonly believed to be whores for money.
(Mary actually wasn't)
I think he's saying he's being slandered/libeled, like Mary Magdalene who wasn't a prostitute but was called one by the church or something. (I don't know if she was or wasn't one, I don't even know if she actually existed, I just know it's been alleged that it was a lie that she was a prostitute)
The last person expelled from the house became a Far Right stooge and helped incept the Tea Party Movement after Obama became president. Traficant was a massive shitbag and so is Santos.
The funny thing is, his last probably would have looked the other way if it was just fraud and misuse of compassion funds. It was the cross dressing that doomed him
What's with the guy with the Simple Jack haircut behind him?
"Never go full retard." - A Lead Farmer Motherfucker.
I guess he's not "Jew-ish" anymore.
This will help free up his time to become the Vice President.
I would contribute to a gofundme to pay someone to slap this man. I wonder if he knows he's unbelievably annoying or if he actually buys into his own bullshit and thinks he's somehow a victim.
Narcissists tend to genuinely think they're the ones being wronged. It's a personality disorder that fucks someone's entire perspective.
George, having a friend named Heyseuss doesn’t make you a religious figure.
We'll need receipts for any kompromat he has due to his track record of Trump-level lying.
They don't like me because I'm an outsider.
MF people don't even know who you are to like you...????
Is it me or are his eyes pink af in that photo? Weird exposure or adjustment maybe? Or, you know, the other thing.
Cool beans bro I could have told you that. You gotta name them.
Santos does mean saints/holy ones. But that's about as close as he'll likely ever get to sainthood.
Fake News! George Santos was, in fact, not only a Saint, but was Drew Brees' backup on that Saints team that won the Super Bowl in 2009
Well, he’s not wrong. He’s still a lying, projecting criminal, but Congress is filthy.
All I know is I want to see Santos and DeSantis on the ring. That rings closer to home than some bs biblical references.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News