This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
How the hell it's even "more tech based than Lenin's model"? Lenin was great advocate of technological progress and tried to build and draw to party every even semi eligible technical personnel he could find, he just had to work with completely backwards country where technical education was solely in the hands of bourgeoisie.
"Lenin's model" moved from semi-feudalism to spaceflight in 40 years, despite 3 huge destructive wars no less.
Lenin: "Communism = Soviet Power + Electrification of the Whole Country"
Western propaganda: "Lenin was against technology!"
Some excerpts from the speech where he famously says that phrase:
"Bring more engineers and agronomists to the fore, learn from them, keep an eye on their work, and turn our congresses and conferences, not into propaganda meetings but into bodies that will verify our economic achievements, bodies in which we can really learn the business of economic development. [...]
Our Party program must not remain solely a program of the Party. It must become a program of our economic development [...]. It must be supplemented with a second Party program, a plan of work aimed at restoring our entire economy and raising it to the level of up-to-date technical development. [...]
Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the whole country. [...] and we shall see to it that the economic basis is transformed from a small-peasant basis into a large-scale industrial basis. Only when the country has been electrified, and industry, agriculture and transport have been placed on the technical basis of modern large-scale industry, only then shall we be fully victorious. [...]
It should, however, be realized and remembered that we cannot carry out electrification with the illiterates we have. Our commission will endeavor to stamp out illiteracy- but that is not enough. [...] Besides literacy, we need cultured, enlightened and educated working people; [...] We must see to it that every factory and every electric power station becomes a center of enlightenment;"
VLADIMIR LENIN, REPORT ON THE WORK OF THE COUNCIL OF PEOPLE’S COMMISSARS. DECEMBER 22, 1920
it really is amazing how much they accomplished in such a short time
bUt nO iPhOnE!!1
I think they are silly enough to not realize that high tech 100 years ago is not what is high tech now. If you truly abandon materialism this does make sense.
This also reminds me of the popular 90's liberal mantra about "knowledge based economy" (used to justify deindustrialisation), as if the economy wasn't ALWAYS based on knowldge ever since people learned how to make fire and tools.
"knowlege based economy" means "work we could not outsource yet"
wth is neocommunism even
googling it keeps giving me eurocommunism
It's like communism, but with more spoon bending (this joke is immediately going to date me)
whoa
Oh no, the evil Kim Jong Un learned Neo’s spoon bending powers and used them on Stalin’s spoon that killed 10000000000 Ukrainians
There is no spoon.
In North Korea, they told us there was no spoon, and if we disagreed they'd make us watch the Matrix sequels
WTF North Korea really does violate human rights?!? 😱
Reminds me of when western "sinologists" throw around the term "neoconfucian". Nonsense concepts that come from people who can only interact with a simulacra of the world.
ok now wtf is neoconfucian lmao
makes about as much sense as "neochristian" or "neomuslim" (it doesn't!!! :D)
It's when communism is still around 100 years later.
I'd love to tell you, but I have to wait until neo-Monday to confirm my hypothesis
America must scale up its efforts to ensure primacy on land, at sea, in the air, in cyberspace and in outer space sufficiently to deter any rivals.
Yes, America's problem is definitely their paltry military spending. They must spend even more on the arms industry, that will fix all their problems. For freedom!
Also in outer space? Is America planning another Space Race? Despite their claims of victory, the last one really didn't go that well for them.
They are already losing the current space race before it even officially started. Just look at China's achievements in this field the last few years and compare it to fuckall that NASA has been doing. China has a new space station that will outlive the ISS which is fast approaching the end of its life span. Has the West been building any replacements? Of course not. They took decades to finish the James Webb space telescope, and i remember that being the "new hotness" in astrophysics back when i was in university and that is already many years ago, everyone was talking about it as if it was going to come online any minute now but by the time they got it up over a decade later it was already outdated.
NASA planing to use SpaceX's Starship as the Human Landing System, has convinced me that China will step foot on the moon before Artemis III.
They aint reckoning with shit lmao
The article is all kinds of hilarious. My fav was this bit a the end:
Beijing’s steady military buildup—combined with its expansionist territorial claims and increased efforts to form partnerships with countries such as Russia and Iran—has major implications for the U.S. defense budget. America must scale up its efforts to ensure primacy on land, at sea, in the air, in cyberspace and in outer space sufficiently to deter any rivals.
Apparently, US plans to take on the combined power of Russia, China, and Iran militarily. The sheer hubris of that is just astounding.
Read: "give moar moniez to our rulers and saviours: MIC, oil barons and banksters"
They ain't 'deterring' shit lmao
While Xi Jinping likely spends little time reading Marx’s “Grundrisse” or debating the labor theory of value with his comrades
this is such a stupid mischaracterization. xi literally has a doctorate in marxism from tsinghua university, he's definitely read more of marx than the author of this bullshit. this whole thing reeks of having zero understanding of marxism or leninism.
I'm pretty sure that nobody with any actual understanding of Marxism or Leninism would be let anywhere close to writing articles in western media.
One time I was interviewed at a strike, they did not write that article
Same way we never hear about mass protests happening in western countries like France, while any protest in a place like China will get wall to wall coverage. Propaganda through selective reporting is very effective.
honestly, they always end up making communism seem based, not counting the worm-brained word salad in the rest of the article.
