199
submitted 10 months ago by Simmumah@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 67 points 10 months ago

Christofascism is so hot right now; these people are enemies of the United States, they want to destroy it and replace it with a theocracy.

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago

And the whole time they will try to gaslight everyone into believing we were always a Christian theocracy and they're just "setting things right."

But yes, these people are legitimately dangerous, primed for violence, and divorced from reality. I'm too lazy to bring up the actual quotes from Matt Shea's "Biblical Basis for War" or whatever the fuck he called it, but it should be cause for alarm when a US state senator sounds more like a Taliban cleric.

[-] DarkenLM@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

"Beware those who can't tell apart the will of God from their own"?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago

I, for one, hope they spend as much of Tuesday as possible praying. If they're too busy praying to vote, so much the better.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago

Going off of how prayer "worked" in hospitals (i.e. it generally caused worse health outcomes), I say they should pray as hard as they can!

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Yup:

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-mar-31-sci-prayer31-story.html

"In an unexpected twist, patients who knew prayers were being said for them had more complications after surgery than those who did not know, researchers reported Thursday.

The complications were minor, and doctors surmised that they could have been caused by the increased stress on patients worried that their conditions were so bad they needed prayers."

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 10 points 10 months ago

I've also heard the hypothesis that people felt that they should be getting better due to the prayer, but were perhaps not/as quickly, and so felt stressed, causing worse outcomes. Like a kind of religion-centered performance anxiety.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

My random theory: people who have prayers said for them tend to be of more conservative families and generally less educated when it comes to things like nutritional science. Thus these people going in just tend to be starting at a worse baseline.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's probably some truth to that. I had a fundie friend who believed heavily in the "God knows the number of your days" thing and knew what doctors recommended, but still ate three-pound triple burgers with cheese and tons of fried food. "God knows the number of my days. He'll take care of me, because I trust him," he would say. He had a heart attack a few years ago and now lives with permanent heart disease.

Religious fundamentalism makes people do and believe really stupid things.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Man I grew up in it and I still don't understand how people can go through adulthood with the cognitive dissonance that is recognizing Santa isn't real and to think otherwise is absursa, but their God of thousands to exist does.

That we can't widely accept a foundation of logic that builds our belief set means we have a lot to learn as a species.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I concur. We should help them by posting stuff about 24 hours of prayer things. You know. To get every one to do their part.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I hope the left begins astroturfing conservative social circles with things like, "The election is rigged anyway, so I'm not voting!"

Payback for years of doing it to us.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 10 months ago

if they can keep their hands praying, those people are prevented from doing anything actually constructive.

religion is slavery

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On a cold night in November, a man named Jefferson Davis addressed a crowd of conservative activists gathered in an American Legion hall 20 miles north of Milwaukee.

Davis was speaking at an event organized by Patriots of Ozaukee County, a rightwing group that vows to “combat the forces that threaten our safety, prosperity and freedoms” and compares itself to the musket-toting Minutemen of the revolutionary war.

Attendees at November’s meeting were unsurprised by the packed house: closer to 200 had attended the Ozaukee group’s last event in October, which featured a long lineup of speakers including Davis.

That event, which included free beer and a gun raffle and was promoted by patriot groups, illustrated the common cause the movement’s activists have found with the grassroots of the GOP.

One bill, passed by the legislature and vetoed by the Democratic governor, Tony Evers, in 2022, would have made it harder for people to qualify as “indefinitely confined”, a status disabled voters can claim to receive an absentee ballot.

During his November presentation in Grafton, Davis handed out a pamphlet listing 53 issues that voters concerned about election security should focus on in Wisconsin.


The original article contains 1,552 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 88%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

What about if they keep praying instead of going to vote? Paying works better right?

this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
199 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4618 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS