this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
940 points (97.3% liked)

Atheist Memes

5549 readers
568 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
fkn@lemmy.world
friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
Donjuanme@lemmy.world
Not2Dopey@sh.itjust.works
940
If Arithemtic were debated like religion (midwest.social)
submitted 10 months ago by Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world
102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] open_world@lemmy.world 101 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

The answer is 178,910,723.64382

Don't ask me why I calculated that

[–] LogarithmicCamel@feddit.uk 83 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't accept your answer. I know deep in my heart that it's 4.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 months ago

I got the same thing on my phone's calculator. Do you think the waterproofing will get in the way when I give it the baptism it clearly needs?

[–] themusicman@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's so ugly, it can't be correct... 4 is much nicer

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Glad you did though, only opened the comments to see what the actual answer was.

[–] MightyWeaksauce@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Ya beat me by seconds. Lemmy is truly blooming lol

[–] PR3CiSiON@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

I got 178,910,723.30891

My answer is superior.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, 4 wasn't that far off, considering.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's a 4 in the more accurate answer. That is proof of the divine showing the truth before man could understand the full answer.

[–] Bayz0r@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

This guy apologetics.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was only a couple orders of magnitude off.

[–] kewko@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

2 is a couple, 9 is more like fewish

[–] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

2 is a couple.

What's a few, several, a bunch, a bit, many, a bundle?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do we really want to live in a world where this fraction is the answer? I would like my kids to grow up knowing it's an integer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Round down for simplicity. Yes, yes, I can see 4 being the easy answer.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I saw three different serious-looking answers, so I punched it into a spreadsheet to get my own answer. What I got matches your answer, but with an extra 2 at the end.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That is too complicated for me to understand, therefore, it is too complicated for everyone to understand. Why would anyone believe something that I can't understand?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Source

Votey:


^(red button below comic)^

[–] NeatNit@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago

I have a guy feeling that one of these days Zach will make the old URL format not work anymore. So here's the same comic in the new format (found by going to the next comic, then the previous) https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2013-10-31

this changes nothing and I have nothing to add, have a nice day

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The product ends in a 5 so it is odd and cannot be divisible by 4.

[–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They'd then go to war

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Those damn people worshipping their rabbit god when we know for a fact the duck god is the true god! Now they refuse to believe the answer is 4.

This means war!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lime66@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

179288872.22473

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Pretty sure it's 4

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

That other number is long and complicated and scary. I looked into my heart and found that 4 was the answer that spoke to me the loudest.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

"it is 4" -- Me 1:1

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This checks. I estimated it to under 1/5 billion.

To the OP, some periods or commas would have been nice.

To the 4ists, Yeah. Well, ya know, that's just, like, your opinion man.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I would have said "42" and walked away

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure his theory is a hypothesis.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's not that far off. Math philosophy gets nuts

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

I remember back in the day when we were all up in arms about sets

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›