this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6335 readers
212 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That's right, I don't see anything wrong with federating with Threads, at least for now. I believe doing so can help the fediverse go mainstream. Meta can't access personal data in other instances by design anyway.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

It's quite alright to not want some huge corporation with a proven track record of being destructive in your free and open social network and still egg on the other billionaire asshole in his public feces throwing contest.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's fair to have different standards for small, non-profit, community-driven, patreon-supported servers, and a behemoth with half a billion users.

The latter can literally change the course of history in a minute. The former can't.

I'll accept it's a hypocrisy if we can somehow have both these sides have the same kind of power.

That said, I don't care about Threads either way. Elon being petty about it is more funny than anything.

[–] ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

There's a difference between allowing speech about a thing and embracing the thing. This is a classic case of embrace, extend, extinguish.

If you're interested, I'd look into what happened with XMPP and Google talk. XMPP was a federated chat service. Google Talk became compatible with it, and instantly became the most popular client for it.

It then broke compatibility slowly, pushing more people from other XMPP clients onto Google talk.

They finally removed it completely, and because they were the most popular client, XMPP users moved to Google talk to maintain their connections to other users. The protocol basically ceased to exist.

People are broadly assuming that's Meta's plan with threads and Mastodon, because it's an extremely common way for corporations to get rid of open systems.