81
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] starkillerfish@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 8 months ago

the couple of soviet posters youve been posting recently are just gold. US politics havent moved a millimeter since 1950s

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 8 months ago

Indeed, and that's what makes them so powerful. They really managed to capture the invariants of the US system.

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 8 months ago

Portraying the self insert as the Chad and the enemy as a cringe soyjak is such a timeless concept.

[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 8 months ago

Funny enough Pegida wanted to burn a Koran today in The Netherlands and their leading guy got beat up by a counterprotest. Socdems are now acting high and mighty saying violence is never an option. Get rekt.

[-] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I can understand being personally opposed to violence, but judging the lower classes for literally fighting their oppressors and intimidators is pretty pointless. It is a historic inevitability.

[-] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 8 months ago

Anyone know what the signs say?

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 8 months ago

The signs say "beat neg..." and "hail fascism"

[-] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 8 months ago
[-] Ocommie63@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 8 months ago
[-] ledlecreeper27@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 8 months ago

Looking up the artist (N. Lisogorsky) shows results from the 1960s and 1970s so I'm guessing it's from around the 1960s civil rights movement.

[-] Ocommie63@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 8 months ago
[-] kig_v2@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 8 months ago

Update their wardrobes and it might as well be from today

[-] Ocommie63@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 8 months ago
[-] Ocommie63@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 8 months ago

I’m guessing the 30s

[-] RedFortress@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Why is Lincoln shown? What does the author try to imply?

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 8 months ago

I think it's just a recognizably American symbol.

[-] redgarza@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 8 months ago

I'd guess the implication is that freedom shouldn't be given to reactionaries and excusing it on the basis of "The American Way" is ahistorical considering than Lincoln didn't give it to southern slavers either.

[-] Idliketothinkimsmart@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Lincoln was pretty racist ngl. The largest single execution of Natives was carried out under his government, though I dont think the inclusion was hinting at that.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 8 months ago

It's that the Nazis in the US aren't in assfuck nowhere senora desert, they're infront of famous places

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
81 points (97.6% liked)

GenZedong

4242 readers
103 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS