531
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Hypersapien@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

These days, kids identify them by the aspect ratio.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 74 points 1 year ago

And video quality. Watching some historical videos from my childhood, like tv shows on youtube.... the quality is pure potato. Either the archiving is terrible, or we just accepted much worse quality back then.

[-] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

People always said that Betamax was better quality than VHS. What never gets mentioned is that regular consumer TVs at the time weren't capable of displaying the difference in quality. To the average person they were the same.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/hGVVAQVdEOs

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

There's a lot of archival video that is just terrible. Digital video compression issues have damaged a lot of old footage that's gotten shared over the years, especially YouTube's encoders. They will just straight up murder videos to save bandwidth. There's also a lot of stuff that just doesn't look great when it's being upscaled from magnetic media that's 240x320 at best.

However, there's also a lot of stuff that was bad to begin with and just took advantage of things like scanlines and dithering to make up for poor video quality. Take old games for example. There's a lot of developers who took advantage of CRT TVs to create shading, smoothing, and the illusion of a higher resolution that a console just wasn't capable of. There's a lot of contention in the retro gaming community over whether games looked better with scanlines or if they look better now without them.

For example.

Personally, I prefer them without. I like the crisp pixelly edges, but I was also lucky enough to play most of my games on a high quality monitor instead of a TV back then. Then emulators, upscaling, and pixel smoothing became a thing...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cokane_88@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was filmed with poor quality and the films can degrade overtime. It was archived that way because the source was 💩

[-] dandroid@dandroid.app 7 points 1 year ago

I watch a lot of hockey. Just watching hockey games from the 2000s are full on potato. I don't remember them looking that bad back then.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 55 points 1 year ago

I do by audio quality. We currently live in the age of badly understandable dialogues.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I noticed when watching Good Omens on Amazon Prime that they offer a language option "Original + Dialogue Boost".

It works wonders. Almost feels like back in the days again when TV shows wanted dialogue to be understood.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] drz@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

I think most people have given up and use subtitles on all the time.

[-] BurnoutDV@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

This is actually because our microphones became better

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYJtb2YXae8

[-] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago

Sure, microphones got better but there is more too it. One huge factor is the mixing for cinemas and not for home theaters or worse for TV speaker.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

No, the video actually goes into that. Directors think it's "more real" to have mumbled dialogues. But they seem to misinterpret that as "more mumble = more good".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barnsbauer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

This video was exactly what first came to mind when I read "badly understandable dialogues"! It bothers me that as we got better mics, the actors became more unintelligible instead of the other way as one would predict.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=VYJtb2YXae8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Does anyone actually randomly send you nude girls? Genuinely curious

[-] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago
[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just as well. Where would you even put them all?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

... or how blurry the image is (SD vs HD).

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Radio vs TV for Boomers

B&W vs Color for Gen X

SD vs HD would be Millenials

4K vs HD for Zoomers

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bufordt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

That's a big problem for stuff that was originally shot on video. Old stuff shot on film can look pretty good when digitized.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

But then you also have that very specific window of time when a lot of stuff especially SFX was done on video that can't be upscaled. Babylon 5 fans weep.

[-] cokane_88@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

When I was a kid I used to think black and white meant the TV show or whatever used to be in color but since it got old it turned black and white. My thought process was they changed color just like old people's hair turns grey... This was 35 years ago before internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] natarey@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

The real differentiator is pacing and editing.

[-] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Especially in action scenes. I used to watch Hawaii five O the 2010 version and sometimes a chanal showed the old version with the same name, the are so incredibly different in pacing and the amount of violence. I really liked the old one in that regard, much less shooting and blood.

[-] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

I sometimes watch old movies and it gets infuriating how long they talk around the same fact that everyone already agrees on. Yes, he was killed with a knife because it's still stuck in his head, now move on!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhiAU@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Re-watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer with my kids in new hi-def, and you can clearly and easily see the stunt doubles now, and the SFX look really dated now that you can see them clearly.

It's amazing what old CRTs would let you get away with.

[-] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's not so much what they got away with but working with the tools they had. It is the same for pixel art in the early gen consoles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pixel@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago

It's not so back and white anymore, is it

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lotta old shows are re-formated just to have the wider screen, since they would still film at higher res for movies or just because. It's not just an indication of age if something is still only in 4:3, it's an indication of thrift or just a general lack of giving a shit about the future.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Also the quality of the show go watch old Thomas the Tank Engine and compare it to the new one

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

I identified them by awkward haircuts and clothing styles. I knew something was off / wrong, but it wasn't until adulthood that I was able to piece it together.

[-] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Can always tell when a show is 4:3 aspect. Recently I've noticed some modern TV shows adopting the theater aspects of flat (1.85:1) or scope (2.4:1) which I think is pretty cool. The last episode of Strange New Worlds I watched was in scope, that's some high end filming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I have a relative who says their children won't watch 2D animated features because they are old

[-] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They still make 2D cartoons

[-] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I think the distinction might be film versus series. Most movies are that bubbly CGI look but the streaming shows are mostly still 2D.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Asteroid City switched between aspect ratios as well as switching between black&white as they swapped between the TV story and the 'real'/cinema story.

[-] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

would you recommend the film? it's been quite under discussed for a Wes Anderson film..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
531 points (95.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29202 readers
957 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS