424
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 147 points 9 months ago

Weirdly enough, everyone else thinks HP equipment is a bad investment.

[-] Shurimal@kbin.social 72 points 9 months ago

Prime example that for a publicly traded company the people buying the products are not customers for whom to create value, but a resource to extract value from.

Shareholders are the real customers for whom they create value.

[-] maness300@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

The entire point of maximizing profit is charging the most while expending the least.

It's a game of seeing how low people's standards are and trying to lower them even further.

As customers, the secret is to have higher standards. Unfortunately, this generation prides itself on avoiding conflict at all costs so they just take it up the ass and beg for more.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

"Every time a customer buys a printer, it's an investment for us. We are investing in that customer, and if that customer doesn't print enough or doesn't use our supplies, it's a bad investment."

You hit the nail right on the head. They don't see their customers as people buying their products, where they typically would be incentivized to deliver a good product at a good price. Instead, they see their customers as people being trapped into some sort of shitty subscription with them, like a cable or cell phone provider.

[-] yuki2501@lemmy.world 60 points 9 months ago

An HP Printer is a bad investment.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't even use the word investment

[-] Classy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My HP 1300n is a beautiful beast of a printer, but I also got it for free and have never put name brand toner in it.

An HP cart is over $200! Meanwhile TrueImage offers theirs for $15/pc.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago

The first thing they teach you in CEO school is to churn out terrible products with DRM subscription refills where the DRM doesn’t survive more than an hour. That’s why we CEOs all have Juiceros, HP printers, and children who respect us.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 38 points 9 months ago

Exhibit B on CEOs not being worth the obscene money they make. This dude made $20 million in 2022.

[-] CodeName@infosec.pub 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And consumers not being able to choose which ink they purchase makes HP printers a bad investment. It goes both ways. It was nice of them to admit what lengths they'll go to to force us to use their proprietary ink cartridges though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 25 points 9 months ago

I don't get why HP continues selling in the consumer market if they are struggling so much to make a profit.It seems like they are trying to force a business model on the wider market that doesn't work.

The subscription model makes more sense in the B2B world where companies just want fixed costs without doing too much shopping around (for things like printer cartridges anyway).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago

TIL Customers aren't customers. Customers are investments.

[-] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You say that like it's a bad thing?

When I buy a jar of peanut butter, if I have a good experience eating it I'm going to buy that brand again. "Investing" in your customers is business speak for making sure your customers have a good experience.

The disconnect here is HP doesn't seem themselves as being in the "printer" business. They see themselves as being in the ink/paper/repairs business... and they advertise their printers as costing 8.6 cents per page. If you're happy to pay that much, then I'd argue HP probably is a good choice.

Personally I use a basic Brother laser printer, with cheap paper and cheap toner it comes in at around 1 cent per page. When I need higher quality, I get it printed by a professional printer - those cost quite a bit more than HP's pricing but I don't do it often and it's much higher quality than any (affordable) HP printer.

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Investing in customers is not necessarily the same as customers being investments.

I would argue that HP made bad investments in their customers and their customers not being bad investments.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What investment are they making in customers? Are they selling something at a loss? Should the FTC BoC ask what exactly they mean here?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MudMan@kbin.social 22 points 9 months ago

I wonder when someone will come up with a hipstery, fancy-looking printer that sells on the basis of "we don't give a crap about all that, here's a bag of ink refills,, just pay us more up-front".

All the tech startups are out there trying to get you into a subscription, I think we're getting to the point where this is annoying enough that you could sell very expensive, fashionable small-run hardware to people on the basis of not being this.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

They're called laser printers. Ink is for idiots, especially if you only print once in a while.

[-] assembly@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I’ve been told that this is Brother Printers but I don’t own one as I no longer need a printer. Not sure how accurate but quite a few folk claim Brother is the last bastion of just buying and using a printer with whatever ink you put through it.

[-] Maestro@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

I have a Brother laser printer. I print a lot. It just works, it's cheap and you can use off-brand toner. It's great!

[-] harmsy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I bought mine a few years ago, and I'm still on the original toner cartridge.

[-] balancedchaos@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I don't use it as often as I thought I would, but my Brother laser printer has served me well.

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago

Yep, i work in it, and for small Printers brother is the only good Option.

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 22 points 9 months ago

if the customer does not print enough

Meaning all home users are a bad investment for HP.

That explains the ink cartridges malfunctioning before giving enough prints. That's been engineered into them.

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Maybe take it as a sign that your product sucks?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Hp just trying to save the environment by making home printing as painful as possible. It really is a 4d chess move

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

He's not wrong. They are bad for their product as a subscription model.

Just like anyone who still buys HP. If you buy HP, you deserve their absolute garbage products.

[-] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

What do you do when you have the monopoly?

Turn the consumer into the commodity!

[-] Pohl@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Investments? Do customers cost you money? That’s now how any of this is supposed to work. I’m not sure the CEO of HP knows anything about business. Dude, the customers are supposed to give YOU the money.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

Yes. They are investments. It's a very common business model across several industries. To sell the initial machine for net cost or even at a loss, if it means customers will have to come back to you for additional supplies. Because that's where the money is.

I'm extremely confident that the CEO of the very profitable company HP. Knows more about business than you do.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 22 points 9 months ago

Oh, okay.

So HPs shitty business practices are at fault here. Glad it isn't ignorance from the CEO. Phew.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Pohl@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Nah I get it. Calling your customer an investment was just a little too naked for me, so I made a joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tonyn@lemmy.ml 16 points 9 months ago

I have a Canon Color LaserJet scanner/copier/printer for documents, and a large format Canon inkjet photo printer. Aftermarket toner, aftermarket ink, and they work flawlessly. I did a ton of research for both. I would never buy an HP printer.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Aftermarket toner, aftermarket ink, and they work flawlessly. I did a ton of research for both. I would never buy an HP printer.

I did the same when I purchased my Samsung color laser. I specifically excluded HP....then Samsung went and sold their entire damn printer division to HP. I refuse to use the Samsung drivers now because I suspect HP would push firmware into the unit blocked non-HP owned toner.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

No regrets on my Brother laser printer! Didn't even consider HP, they've been trash for ages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] st3ph3n@midwest.social 16 points 9 months ago

Boo fucking hoo, HP.

[-] sudo_tee@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

I have an HP BW laser printer with an offbrand cartridge that I paid a fraction of the price. The printer screams at me about critically low ink since about a year but prints are totally fine and as good as the first day.

I'm sorry for your loss HP.... You can suck it

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

The "P" in HP stands for poop.

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago

HP actually stands for (extremly)high profits. It refers to the how much money they make from ink

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 9 months ago

Executives lately are going full James Bond villain. They should evil laugh more.

[-] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Fucking Clowns. Being a shareholder means you aren’t buying their shitty printers or what ^^?

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Kind of like their stock bud dum tssss

[-] white_shotgun@aussie.zone 9 points 9 months ago

Typical overreaching corporate dogs

[-] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I was fortunate enough to get an older HP color laser MFD that can use 3rd party toner carts. I've never bought a first line HP cartridge for it and I never will. My next printer will be some other brand that plays nice with customers.

The only reason I even have this printer now is because I got it crazy cheap off of craigslist about 10 years ago, with extra supplies. When it dies, I'll get a brother or something better. I've bought 3 sets of toner carts for it in 10 years or so for a grand total of maybe 150$, and I use it a lot.

[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

I don't want you to invest in me HP.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
424 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59094 readers
3098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS