176

We Finally Know How Ancient Roman Concrete Was Able to Last Thousands of Years (www.sciencealert.com)

submitted 9 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 202 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Every year we seem to get an article about how we've finally discovered how Romans had really good concrete, as if we've not already known for ages.

The issue has always been about logistics, cost, time to produce, etc — not because we had no idea how the Romans did it.

[-] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 99 points 9 months ago

This plus extreme selection bias. There's plenty of concrete that did not last for thousands of years.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 39 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"They don't make things like they used to. See that tube radio over there? It's 75 years old and still working! A rare find!"

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

But in their defense, not a single thing on Earth made in the last decade has lasted 75 years. Check mate.

[-] JayObey711@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

And also fucking 16 wheelers. Romans did not drive 80 ton (made up number. I don't know how heavy big trucks are. But I'm Shure they are lighter than ancient wagons. To be honest I just hate cars and I want to use a scientific discussion to push my personal political view.) vehicles.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 35 points 9 months ago

Did you learn your usage of parentheticals from David Foster Wallace?

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nothing beats learning it from LISP :)

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 22 points 9 months ago

Thousands of years, to be exact.

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 73 points 9 months ago

let me guess, the didn't fill it with iron that would corrode and expand and blow out the concrete? or the fact that it has an excess of fired lime that re-seals cracks?

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 131 points 9 months ago

You do know that rebar frames are completely essential for most concrete construction right? It's not some conspiracy to induce failure. Concrete by itself can only handle compression forces - the rebar allows it to handle tension, torsion and sheering.

[-] applebusch@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

I'm guessing they do, but it does also reduce the life of the concrete. Modern concrete structures would be impossible without rebar, so that makes it a good trade, but it doesn't change the fact that it's a trade.

[-] gaifux@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Rebar is a god damn conspiracy against the youth my dude

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago

the youths?

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

the youths?

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 69 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yep, it’s the the lime. And: “ The team is now working on commercializing their concrete as a more environmentally friendly alternative to current concretes.”

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 68 points 9 months ago

Quick lime as a 'concrete' is nothing new, or newly rediscovered though... The story seems to come up every few years, and anyone that has used a fluidised lime boiler knows how good quick lime is at forming concrete.

[-] Brcht@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago

And, coincidentally, every time the story comes up there's a company ready to sell you the magic roman concrete.

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 16 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I was thinking it's like the "Voyager Has Left the Solar System" story - we've heard that several times over the years, and probably will again.

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 16 points 9 months ago

To be fair, we keep expanding what we class as the solar system. Poor old voyager keeps getting the goalposts moved!

[-] baronofclubs@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The year is 76,014. Voyager still hasn't left the solar system. Also, the solar system now contains Proxima Centauri.

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

What is that, like 12 people now?

[-] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

that'd be great, a lot of buildings are torn down just because the concrete cracks.

i'd be interested in seeing how using better concrete impacts overall costs and of course emissions. because the building ends up standing for a lot longer, the temperature isolation becomes very sub-par over time. that would increase total energy consumption compared to buildings that are frequently rebuilt.

but very promising.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Meh. Lime mortar absorbs and releases moisture. IRC "Roman" lime concrete is much the same.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan, but that kind of thing isn't compatible with modern insulation. You end up with damp and mould issues in the walls.

Sure it works great in uninsulated stuff though. But people and governments want every room in a building to be insulated nowadays. The whole one warm room, the rest of the building is cold and you'd better wear a three piece suit or heavy wool jumper thing, is abhorrent to our spoiled western arses.

Also: the Romans didn't build their buildings that high. AFAIK Lime concrete has lower tensile and compressive strength, which is an issue with high rise buildings.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Sure it works great in uninsulated stuff though. But people and governments want every room in a building to be insulated nowadays. The whole one warm room, the rest of the building is cold and you’d better wear a three piece suit or heavy wool jumper thing, is abhorrent to our spoiled western arses.

Spoken like somebody who doesn't live where rooms would be intolerably hot without insulation most of the year.

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 16 points 9 months ago

Also we only see the few structures which survived. 99%+ did not make it 2000 years.

[-] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

the iron is a great way to increase tensile strength, but decreases lifespan, rust free metals would also be much nore expensive.

[-] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Epoxy covered rebar exists as does one made from stainless steel. It's just quite pricey so it's rarely used unless absolutely necessary. Rust is generally not an issue as long as the rebar is deep inside the concrete. When it's close to the surface and gets exposed to elements is when the problems start.

[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

Wdym? Just replace the iron rebar with gold

[-] Steve@communick.news 6 points 9 months ago

Gold is no where near strong enough.
Titanium would work just as well, and last quite a bit longer.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Isn't titanium too rigid for this application though? I've worked with both for a mechanical application, and titanium has no flex, so stresses get passed in to other components.

I don't know, I'm no civil engineer. Any civvies wanna fill us in?

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 9 months ago

That could be. Maybe some alloy? Not sure

[-] Wojwo@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Aluminum then?

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'd say all the Civil engineers who continue to spec steel do it for well-established reasons.

Steel is just so hard to beat in so many applications. Even for the average road bicycle, surprisingly. Because steel can tolerate more flex than things like aluminum/titanium/carbon fiber. So other materials require different designs. In the end, the average street bike in steel or aluminum can often weigh the same, depending on the design choices (not specialized bikes, where different compromises are made).

Like so many things, when used as designed in concrete, steel is just fine, and I assume meets the cost, availability, industry knowledge, etc, goals.

Makes me think of "don't remove a fence until you know why it's there". Every year upcoming engineers do tests during their education. If a different material was a better choice, I'm sure a research arm of a university would present it.

[-] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 5 points 9 months ago

i thought they finally caught on with the blood sacrifices~

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024

176 points (85.5% liked)

Technology

59118 readers

3227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS