this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
227 points (96.3% liked)

Risa

6943 readers
4 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Lwaxana@startrek.website 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago

You just made an enemy for life

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 33 points 10 months ago

Star Trek isn't Star Trek, but on occasion you may find that it's Star Trek.

[–] Steve@communick.news 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The whole idea of "Canon" is a comforting self delusion and lie.
Let it go. Enjoy what's in front of you. Stop getting distracted by things that don't really matter to the story at hand. That's how TOS did it.

[–] BunnyKnuckles@startrek.website 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I love that song

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean there's nothing wrong with your second point about enjoying what you like and not getting distracted by minutiae, buuuut unlike other franchises Star Trek quite literally does have an official canon:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_canon

[–] Steve@communick.news 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That would be the lie part.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wake up sheeple Big Trek and Wikipedia are lying to you!

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Canon

Ah, yes, the word that separates which made-up stories are more real than other made-up stories!

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

YES! Perfect description! That should be the definition of the term.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

ALL Star Trek is underrated.

Star Trek should have been the property that influences the entire culture of the United States of America, like how Doctor Who influences the culture of the United Kingdom. Instead, US culture is based around Star Wars and Star Trek is regulated to a bunch of punchlines that normal people know just enough to understand.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

This is a hot take out of, like, 1979. The general public hasn't had this relationship to Trek in a long ass time.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Star Wars is a story about how America is bad and fascism can be defeated through the power of taoist philosophy. That doesn't sound like the currently dominant American value system to me

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 10 months ago

I honestly don't care

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Grumble grumble fuckin' Klingons grumble grumble continuity issues grumble grumble.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

I do like that they sort of explained the Klingon Empire was getting really into genetic experimentation. It kind of ties in the DS9 tribbles episode as seen here.

The simple "We do not discuss it with outsiders" line is great. Which actually makes me want to watch more DS9...

Anyway... some of the continuity issues are explained away in the second season? Sort of?

It's still my least watched trek. I've even watched more of the Animated Series than Discovery.

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Care to expand on what specific continuity issues you’re concerned about?

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The main one would be, in 53 years of Trek before Discovery, Spock never mentioned a sister.

Which is mostly of explained at the end of Season 2 of Discovery.

If you just noped out in Season 1, which a lot of the more conservative sort of trekie did, then you'd miss that.

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's not a continuity error, that's an aspect of Spock's character.

• In "Amok Time" Kirk learned that Spock was engaged to T'Pring, and he also comments that Spock never mentioned how important his family was after learning that T'Pau would be officiating the ceremony.

• In "Journey to Babel" Kirk suggests to Spock that he might want to travel to the surface of Vulcan to spend time with his parents, while Sarek and Amanda are standing right in front of them. Kirk learns that Spock's father is one of the most well regarded diplomats in the Federation.

• In "Yesteryear" when Spock returns from this journey to the Vulcan of his childhood, he tells Kirk that the only thing that changed was that a pet died. He doesn't mention that it was his childhood pet that died protecting him.

• In "Star Trek: The Final Frontier" Kirk learns that Spock had a half brother, Sybok. At that point they've known one another for 22 years.

• In "Sarek" Picard mentions having met Sarek at Sarek's son's wedding. What son? Spock? If it was Spock, there's no mention of him having a wife when he later shows up in the "Unification" two parter, or in the Kelvin films. Another, as of yet, unnamed member of Spock's family?

It would be a bigger continuity issue if Spock had mentioned a sister.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago

It would be a bigger continuity issue if Spock had mentioned a sister.

Wow this is a great point. Spock never mentions his family until essentially forced at phaserpoint.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

I noped out in season 1 because I didn't think Discovery was woke enough

[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Worf's Klingon prosthetics literally changed between season 1 and seasons 2-7 of TNG. This obviously raises serious continuity issues about whether seasons 2-7 of TNG are even canon...

https://screenrant.com/star-trek-worf-tng-klingon-makeup-change-reason/

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Give him a break, he was still in gene therapy for the augment virus

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Worf went through puberty.

[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Perhaps today is a good day for my voice to break!

[–] fu@libranet.de 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nobody hates Star Trek as much as Star Trek fans.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

I'll never stop hoping for more new Whomp.

[–] Lemmeenym@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I like to imagine that Discovery takes place in the Kelvinverse rather than the main timeline.

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

There would be actual canon issues if that was the case as opposed to the mostly imagined ones that people bring up.

[–] mactan@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

10/10 characters and casting, but wtf is going on with the writing

[–] rovingnothing29@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠤⠒⠈⠉⠉⠉⠑⠢⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡔⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡾⢼⣦⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠖⠁⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⠧⣾⠛⢿⣓⠺⠶⠆⠀⢀⣠⡏⠀⡼⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣦⡈⠑⢦⡈⠙⢝⣠⣾⠿⣿⣴⡿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣶⣶⣶⣶⣦⣤⣤⣤⣀⣼⣆⡙⠶⢄⢉⠒⠢⠻⡇⡎⠁⣼⣷⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡔⠉⠉⡝⠙⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡉⠒⠐⠊⠀⠀⠀⠀⠳⣼⣏⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡤⠖⠉⠀⠀⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⠻⢿⣿⣿⡿⠱⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣷⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⠖⠉⠛⠒⠒⠒⠒⠂⡎⠀⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠐⠛⠯⢷⡦⠼⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢀⣀⠤⢒⣉⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣠⠄⠀⢀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠠⠤⢤⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣑⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⣸⢧⡉⠉⠛⠛⠿⠿⣿⣿⣶⡀⠀ ⠰⣏⢳⡀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡠⢠⡼⣇⣀⠴⠊⠁⠀⢣⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣄ ⠀⠈⠳⣹⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⠄⠚⠁⠀⠸⡍⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢦⠎⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⡿ ⠀⠀⠀⠹⣷⠀⠀⠀⢠⠤⢀⣀⣤⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠤⠒⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠱⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⡄⠤⡤⠤⠤⠤⠄⠈⡇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢁⡠⠤⠞⠀⠀⢠⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠳⡄⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⢠⢿ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

[–] BumbleBeeButt@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My only complaint is the time wasted crying as a Klingon bird of prey decloaks behind them.

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago

Which episode was that?

[–] Oddbin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I've always been of the opinion that something is cannot if the owners say it is. Doesn't mean I like it but I accept it. This is coming from the person who doesn't like that they don't respect ship names and registrations in Picard S3. Excelsior is NCC-2000 (insert Letter) not 90-odd thousand and something! /Rant

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 9 months ago

I have to disagree with the first sentence because Disney swept away all the extended universe canon when they took over Star Wars and I refuse to acknowledge that Kyle Katarn isn't canon anymore.

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

Star Trek Enterprise is the *only * canon Star Trek show.

The Kelvin Timeline follows it and mentioned Admiral Archer's prized beagle.

The Original Series, The Next Generation, Voyager, Deep Space Nine, Prodigy, Picard, and Lower Decks had their canon overwritten by time travel from the movies and retroactive continuity. Discovery, while also a prequel and giving some nods to ENT in later seasons, is now in a branched off timeline of the future. Star Trek Strange New Worlds also treats Enteprise as canon (and give homages to it), but is also branched out in a different timeline now with what they changed from Khan's origin.