this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22767 readers
408 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I do like Star Trek a lot, especially TNG, DS9, and Below Decks. Voyager and TOS are fine. Space socialism is pretty good and I can't get enough of it. There are a few common tropes that irk me. tho.

  1. Baseball is cracker Amerikkkan nonsense - You telling me that all these different species and planets get together to chill, and the vibe they're gonna channel is Ohio?? Football (soccer) or some version of hockey make a lot more sense, you can pick up and start playing immediately. I can't imagine Worf wanting to learn all those pointless rules about balls and strikezones and fowls. Sisko is arguably the best captain of any series, and I really get pulled out of an episode every time he drops some awful baseball trivia. It's only slightly better than Nascar. I actually know one Scottish person who really likes baseball, and he's literally the worst person I know.

  2. The tribunal - It's so damn common. It seems like every season there's got to be a court-martial, hearing, or appeal against a Starfleet decision. I guess Law and Order is big there. It's probably a minor critique, but it does reinforce the ideology that Western courtrooms are fair.

  3. Kirk is a sex pest - This has been said to death, but leave your subordinates alone.

  4. Poker in TNG - Poker has to be the worst form of entertainment, and I genuinely like maths. I blame TNG for reigniting the poker craze of the 90s and ruining all my guy friends' personalities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] duderium@hexbear.net 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not communist enough. And NuTrek isn’t communist at all.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

if i could personally reboot star trek and make only one major change it would be this

modern star trek is just liberalism + unlimited energy sources and instant matter/energy conversion

i would even be happy if there was more explanation between "and then WW3 happened" "yadda yadda mad max then vulcans came and we did global unified liberal democracy"

should be "ww3 happened, global war communism established in the aftermath, pockets of misery persisted, hail mary warp ship launched by an opportunist living in a commune, vulcans come and are impressed with unified global communist government rebuilding the wasteland and do aid programs"

that would build a foundation for what United Earth and later the federation really came from. the strict pacifistism and bio-essentialism make sense form a lore perspective (icky genetically enhanced warlord armies and global nuclear war) but where did the communism come from?

[–] Saeculum@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people believed at the time that communism would just sort of manifest once scarcity effectively stopped existing.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago

there's lots of people that still believe this

once energy becomes "too cheap to meter" or we develop at home fabricators with cheap feedstocks...boom...communism!

people forget you need a social revolution too or else now you just have capitalists controlling the fusion reactors and fabricator tech and can turn that shit off at the push of a button what are you going to do about it serfs enjoy your "free" fabricated mush and be happy you have a tiny stipend to live off of or the robotic hunter-killers liquifiy your brain with a micro explosive shaped charge

[–] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Baseball is cracker Amerikkkan nonsense

I know one man who disagrees fidel-bat fidel-wut field-baseball

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Baseball is only cool when played in Cuba and maybe like 3 other Central American countries. It is sad to see Cuban teenagers trying to make it into the US professional league in order to life themself out of poverty. That's gotta be one draw for them, tho.

[–] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago

It's also just a game that's pretty fun to play even if your skill level is low and doesn't require much land or very expensive equipment. It's popular for the same reasons soccer is. Also yeah it was invented by kkkolonizers, but like, poor urban working class kkkolonizers in industrial East Coast cities, a lot of whom were immigrant who didn't really count as "proper-white" back when it was invented.

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

To expand on the Baseball thing, almost the entirety of Tom Paris' character. With the honorable exception of the episode about old black and white Sci Fi shows, Tom Paris seems like a stand-in for a character who happens to enjoy all the things the audience's dad likes. Referencing weirdly specific American 1900s culture is a common trope in Star Trek but with Tom Paris it seemed to magnify.

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago

Good point. I really never vibed with Paris, and I could never figure out why.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

the usual gripes are that it's not gay enough because berman was a coward, that voyager and prequel shitshow suffer from production team burnout after doing it for a decade plus, the TNG movies break character a ton, the capitalists keep hiring people who don't understand why trek was good to make it (abrams, kurtzman) so all the live-action stuff after whatever the last good episode of voyager is has been terrible.

we need optimistic scifi now more than ever and nobody will make it

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago

the usual gripes are that it's not gay enough

we need optimistic scifi now more than ever and nobody will make it

Hard agree

[–] BeanBoy@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago

I need volcel-judge any time I see garak and Bashir in a scene together

[–] nicholaimalthus@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The mindset that began around DS9 and strengthened in the new treks.

While DS9 had some good episodes and good characters, and great acting, it also created fans that began to take all the wrong moral lessons from it, or the ones the creators intended. Militarism, military fetishism, and "ends justify the means" thinking. It was probably a reflection of what would become more and more common amongst the US populace going into the 2000s and onward. Culturally we make excuse en masse for our conflicts or our war crimes or support thereof like Sisko because "It had to be done". Related, I remember the scene with Dax/Sisko and the spent phaser coil from the ship. The "Take a good look people" and then a speech about pride of how long they keep on fighting and hanging that coil up on the wall as a trophy. I feel these sentiments have only carried on in the modern trek series even harder.

Which is why when Boimler in Lower Decks confronted his trigger happy, edgy, fellow crewmembers on the Titan with this line, I smiled. "I didn't join Starfleet to get into phaser fights. I signed up to explore! To be out in space and making new discoveries and peaceful diplomatic solutions. THAT's boldly going. And you know what? I'd love to be in a string quartet. I love that when Riker was on the Enterprise he was jamming on the trombone and catching love disease and acting in plays and meeting his transporter identical clone Thomas."

And I feel that's kind of what's missing in the newer treks. The sense that the lives of these people in the future are different, and not always conflict focused. They have time to stop, to pursue a hobby, paint a picture, go on vacation, find out what it is to be who they are, and THEN go on a wild space adventure for the episode carrying that discovery their little downtime gave them to provide new insights. Perhaps the lives of the people in new trek are more relatable, because they to have rare downtime and are task focused nearly 90% of the time. But it doesn't paint a picture that things will be better, only the same, with technology we don't yet have.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

Amen. We need filler episodes so this can happen. Nu Trek doesn't really do chill episodes or show much of the crew just kinda dicking around doing day to day stuff. The 10 episode season is the culprit imo. It can be good for a show to just burn off an episode or two and focus on something a bit more low key. 26 per season seems like waaaaaay too big a workload, but 15-20 seems fine along with the expectation that they don't all need to be bangers. I don't really need a plot to enjoy star trek. Just watching that world exist is fun. We gotta get some bottle episodes and episodes where they clearly had to save budget for the bigger ones. They'd never make Data's Day or Our Man Bashir nowadays.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Holodeck episodes are literally the worst. I am watching a show about space socialism I don't want to watch an entire episode about the wild West or a New York detective or whatever just knock it off

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Lol when I see those episodes, I just assume that they just ran out of set design money.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago

That is 100% what they feel like yeah

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago

Okay but the Moriarty episode was pretty good

[–] NeelixBiederman@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago

data-revolutionary get em boys

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Baseball is popular in a lot of countries, e.g. Cuba, Japan

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Amerikkkan colonies, past and present.

Edit: Sorry to beat the anti-baseball drum. But I saw the Colin Kaepernick documentary some time ago, and his feelings on baseball rubbed off on me a bit.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Soccer is arguably English (I've seen one historian claim it's Dutch)

[–] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ironically, lacrosse is an American Indian sport but nowadays it's mostly played by preppy white future CIA agents.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] someone@hexbear.net 15 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Baseball is cracker Amerikkkan nonsense

In fairness, baseball is seen by most Trek characters as this weird-ass historical thing that regular people don't really care about if they know about it at all.

The tribunal

It's cheap to film with 20th century TV technology.

My biggest gripe with Star Trek is the anachronistic sexism in TOS and TNG. Guess which two sword-trained TNG main cast actors didn't get to use swords in Qpid!

Also, the homophobia right up until Lower Decks. Maybe Discovery and Picard were good about queer issues, I wouldn't know, I watched the pilots of both and decided not to continue watching either one. I haven't seen any of Strange New Worlds because the same people IRL who recommended Discovery and Picard are recommending me Strange New Worlds, and I no longer trust their judgment.

[–] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Strange new worlds is way better than Picard and Discovery but it suffers from some of the same issues as all new Trek.

There's an omelas episode in the first season and it's actually pretty good.

[–] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There's a DS9 episode where they talk about football (not the American king) and it seems like that's the most popular sport in the Federation. Siskos baseball obsession is a niche thing he's personally into, it's like a guy being really into Scottish Games in the US .

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Guess which two sword-trained TNG main cast actors didn't get to use swords in Qpid!

Wait you saying they had sword trained actresses that didn't get used??

angery

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

Also, the homophobia right up until Lower Decks.

True. I'm sad I didn't think of this first.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] solitaire@infosec.pub 14 points 8 months ago

Baseball is cracker Amerikkkan nonsense - You telling me that all these different species and planets get together to chill, and the vibe they’re gonna channel is Ohio?? Football (soccer) or some version of hockey make a lot more sense, you can pick up and start playing immediately. I can’t imagine Worf wanting to learn all those pointless rules about balls and strikezones and fowls. Sisko is arguably the best captain of any series, and I really get pulled out of an episode every time he drops some awful baseball trivia. It’s only slightly better than Nascar. I actually know one Scottish person who really likes baseball, and he’s literally the worst person I know.

When I recently self-flagellated by catching up on Discovery, the moment that brought me closest to giving up was this scene where each of the bridge crew listed places on Earth they'd like to visit when they made it back. Every single one of them listed places in the US. Star Trek has always been US supremacist, but they don't even give a token nod to multi-nationalism anymore.

The series is just so much more right wing in many sense these days. It's a far cry from Roddenberry deciding that for a utopian future, there needed to be a Russian crew member despite it being the height of the cold war.

[–] Gorillatactics@hexbear.net 14 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The only art-forms that are talked about are 'high' art-forms. Operas, symphonies, poetry and the like. Does nobody in the federation make pop music? Are there no holodeck programs that are considered art?

[–] Blep@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago

Lower decks again, but the cast does make a micheal bay-esque movie in the holo deck

[–] Candidate@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Voyager actually had an entire running subplot of Paris liking cheesy b-movies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There's that weird chuchu band in lower decks. When they added the third chu it was crazy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

They're also 'Public Domain' art forms. There are holo-novels that seem to be as respected as normal novels are now. I think part of the reason in universe is that you only really see this on tng and Voyager, on TNG it's the diplomatic flagship so operas and classical concerts are probably regularly scheduled entertainment on the off chance they're transporting some stuffed shirted asshole alien diplomat, which happens constantly. So it's like how you don't bring a visiting foreign diplomat to a punk show or McDonald's, you go to an opera and a fancy restaurant. The ship is fucking massive and there's a lot of crew, so I'm sure people are doing stuff that's actually fun elsewhere. Like in Lower Decks.

[–] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 14 points 8 months ago

My biggest pet peeve is Enterprise specific, the fucking decontamination room scenes are just "Wow look at how hot T'pol is."

[–] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

Yeah two big ones:

Starting with DS9 and then up to the present, the show leans waaaaaay too heavily on nostalgia and fans love of familiar characters. TNG is largely free of this other than that one Scotty episode. But in DS9, they just keep bringing back characters like Q, Lwaxana, etc. Maybe not the biggest deal when it’s just an episode or two but then they decided to bring back Worf for the last 4 seasons. He doesn’t really serve a point other than “hey, you all love Worf, right?” I really feel like all Worf did was steal the limelight from Sisko / Avery Brooks. After that it’s obvious how they do this in Nu Trek - I mean “Picard” is an entire show that runs on nostalgia. SNW literally brings back the Enterprise. “Discovery” I guess tried to not do this until they felt we needed more Spock.

The reason why it bugs me so much is I really think it stops the franchise from growing and changing in positive ways, the way overdosing on nostalgia tends to do for people. For example, the show runners originally wanted Ro Laren to be in the role played by Nana Visitor because hey, viewers know her from TNG. The actress who plays Ro didn’t want to do it so they hired Nana Visitor; and I don’t think any of us can imagine DS9 without her. But she never would have been hired if the producers had their first, nostalgic choice.

And other the first DS9 one, I despise mirror universe episodes. The first one in DS9 is great because it’s just a silly way for the actors to be able to let loose and play against type. But then they decided to make it a recurring theme, and then the novelty wears off fast. And then I actually stopped watching Discovery when they made the mirror universe a major plot point. Again, it’s just so silly and ridiculous but the way Discovery tries to play it straight and serious just doesn’t work for me.

Edit: I also wanted to add that I really hated the forced Odo/Kira romance. They spent years working together without a hint of romantic interest until the writers decided they needed to pair off someone. No chemistry and kind of an odd pairing. And why not just let Odo be ace, you know?

[–] BeanBoy@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Discovery totally takes itself too seriously and forgets that ultimately Star Trek was always kind of silly and was the better for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] beef_curds@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Poker in TNG

I like the poker in tng because it confirms my theory that the main point of divergence between the Trek universe and ours is that Texas Holdem was never invented.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

The three white male captains get to command the biggest/fastest/most famous flagship in the fleet.

The black captain starts off as a commander on a broken down space station in a bad neighborhood.

The woman captain gets hopelessly lost in the first episode.

These are not good tropes.

Also, why the fuck are Starfleet naming conventions so human centric? We should see a bunch of Starfleet ships with Vulcan, Andorian, and Tellerite names. You can kind of handwave away the ones that are abstract concepts like Enterprise, Voyager, Defiant, etc by saying their names in each language are different. But there are so many ships named after Earth locations and historical figures. Where are the other races in all this?

[–] Saeculum@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago

Apparently each member species retains their own space force after joining the federation and starfleet was formed around what was earth's.

[–] nicholaimalthus@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

Also, why the fuck are Starfleet naming conventions so human centric? We should see a bunch of Starfleet ships with Vulcan, Andorian, and Tellerite names. You can kind of handwave away the ones that are abstract concepts like Enterprise, Voyager, Defiant, etc by saying their names in each language are different. But there are so many ships named after Earth locations and historical figures. Where are the other races in all this?

Thankfully Lower Decks fixed a little of this. Star Fleet is just one fleet organization in the Federation. With apparently the Andorians and Vulcans having their own ships running about doing their own things too. Like the Sh'vhal in Lower Decks, having to come in and save the Cerritos. Star Fleet is just the biggest of the bunch and more likely to be "out there" doing exploration instead of local system patrol or whatnot.

From a storytelling/production standpoint: Humans are easier/cheaper to costume. Human sized corridors easier and cheaper to build for doing shots with human sized chairs you can get out of a Lexus. So Starfleet is a very human fleet. Also in the early days of models, TOS just reused the enterprise over and over with different number combinations on the hull and a different name, so they don't have to build new models. TNG they had money, but kept a design style going cause they had the molds and its cheaper to follow a style rather than start a new ship whole cloth. Thus why some alien ships in TNG are just models they built for the movies turned upside down or backwards and repainted. DS9 and on they started to breach using CGI so they got to expand a little but still had that same style to focus on. Modern trek they got lazy and copy pasted ships :P

Overall it is impossible to write a sci-fi and avoid human centrism in any fashion, even the abstract, because we only know the perspective of being human, and humans are the only ones we yet know writing fiction. Even in fiction where humans are say, the one amongst many, and not the most important in things, (And not throwing a fit about it like Anakin Skywalker. Looking at you Mass Effect) The story is usually from a human persepctive trying to understand the unknown alien ways that exist around them. Kind of like the impression I got from the Chanur novels by C.J. Cherryh but it's been a decade or more since I read it so I may be wrong.

[–] Azarova@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

not queer and communist enough. andorians canonically have 4 genders!!! imagine how genderfucked you'd be after several lifetimes as a joined trill!! so many missed opportunities that are canon but never explored.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago

I really hate multiverse stuff. This is a criticism I definitely didn't have until the past few years when the concept got ran into the ground, but I think Star Trek would benefit if they just retconned the whole thing with a bit where some Starfleet scientist proves mathematically that other universes can't exist and the ones we've seen have all been temporary aberrations in spacetime or something.

[–] operacion_ogro@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I always wonder why they've never explored weaponizing warp drives as a plot point. If they strapped a warp drive to an asteroid and fired it at Warp 9 towards a planet it'd be unstoppable. Like I guess this would just end up creating Mutually Assured Destruction in Space, but it seems so obvious to do that it's weird it's never addressed

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (5 children)

cringe

baseball is more popular today in estados not unidos. The player Ben idolizes played for a london team, and i don't think they meant london ontario, and they got a Hawaiian actor.

lol watch the drumhead

kirk was well-behaved for the late 1960s

a bluffing game is great for the cast of characters they have at the table and teaching data lessons. the poker craze was pretty much all hold'em not the various games played on tng.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

Poker is boring if there are no actual stakes.

[–] beef_curds@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I thought about this more today and it's actually all the plots where Troi is violated in some way. It feels like that's the only plot she gets until the final season when they actually give her some better plots to chew on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Candidate@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago

I don't think anyone likes how the Prime Directive is used - if you agree with the idea of non-interference, it's too often used used as just a cheap tension builder for why they can't help people facing imminent extinction and if you don't, well, it's even worse.

load more comments
view more: next ›