289

Vietnam seeks death for tycoon in $12bn fraud case (www.bangkokpost.com)

submitted 6 months ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 100 points 6 months ago

We seem to like to draw a line between crimes where the damages caused are visible from those where the damages caused are less visible, but its undoubtable that the crimes of the wealthy, so called white collar crimes, cause just as real material pain and suffering and societal damage.

If anything, the consequences of a crime should be scaled by your wealth and privileged in a society, because you really have no excuse for not following the law. Earn above a million dollars a year? Well a parking ticket costs you 10s of thousands of dollars? Earn above a billion a year and park outside the lines? Gallows.

[-] fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Earn above a billion a year and park outside the lines? Gallows.

Making these people members of the working class is a fate worse than death.

I think we should just do that.

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 6 months ago

Sure, but at least tar and feather them first.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Instead of tar, use glue. Then yes.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

If proven beyond a doubt, I agree. But the communist leadership has been fairly lax on enforcement ... until now that is. One has to wonder why all of a sudden they've decided to do something?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 57 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I feel like this is an important thing.

Top global firms, such as Ernst & Young and KPMG, did not flag concerns about the bank in their audits, public documents show.

[-] BugKilla@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

The board, CEOs and senior executives of these leeches need to be standing in line holding their wicker baskets.

[-] az04@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

The state shouldn't be in the business of killing people.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

While true, billionaires shouldn't be in the business of existing.

[-] Hooverx@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago

$12 billion dollars is the equivalent of the 1.3 million years of work in vietnam. that's the livelihoods of more than 34000 people, stolen to profit one person.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The Vietnamese government does things like this on a cyclical basis. Every rich person here and everyone in government is corrupt as fuck. The president resigned a few hours ago over corruption. The president before him resigned just over a year ago over corruption. They're all stealing money. New government comes in and puts the old government in jail for corruption. A newer government comes in and puts that government in jail for corruption. Death sentences for people in top positions and bankers and whoever else. But they're all corrupt. Everyone above middle class here is corrupt.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 6 months ago

Killing them won't change that.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Completely agree. Except for billionaires. Kill them all and do something useful for society with their money.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 6 months ago

Man people on this site are so bloodthirsty. Why not just seize their assets and liquidate them?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I honestly think there is comfort in the idea that it will literally never happen so it's easier for them to throw around "guillotine" in place of "I'm mad and I hate these people."

They'll still argue that they mean it but they will literally never do it.

Never.

Again for those in the back, you people will never break out the guillotines, it's all talk.

[-] Schnabeltierpoet@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

Why not just seize their assets and liquidate them?

YES, YES! Seize their assets and liquidate the billionaires!

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

The damage billionaires can do by leveraging their money is so immense it could financially ruin many people's lives. How many end up homeless or kill themselves out of despair? Their one life isn't enough to balance the scales but it'll send a very clear message to white collar criminals once one is executed: the damage you do is tantamount to first degree murder and will be punished as such.

load more comments (22 replies)

[-] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 27 points 6 months ago

Finally, some good news!

[-] danh2os@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

That's a lot of dong.

[-] Thassodar@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Over 9000 dong, 4% of their GDP.

[-] jwt@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

You really shouldn't call their P gross.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

The guillotine you say?

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

I'm ok with this.

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 75 points 6 months ago

I'm not. Imprison her for life, but the death penalty is never acceptable as long as there's even the slightest chance of a false conviction. As long as "the system" can get it wrong, it should not be allowed to carry out irreversible punishments.

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

I get what you're saying and I can't say I disagree, but conversely:

Eat the rich

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 months ago

Sadly, prions are terrifying, so eating the rich is not a practical possibility.

Now, feeding them alive to the big cats at the zoo, on the other hand, would serve the same purpose, and entertain the kitties to boot, which the brain control parasites my kittens have infected me with tell me is a good thing, and since we don't eat them or anything that eats them there's no risk of prion spread, at least until deer chronic wasting disease inevitably spreads to humans and kills us all.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As they say, there are no ~~moral~~ ethical billionaires. In order to enrich themselves so much over their peers, they have necessarily trampled over them.

I do agree that giving a government the official power to just execute whoever they want (it would be trivial to manufacture a case like this in Vietnam) is a very bad precedent to set.

But, I mean, Vietnam is an authoritarian government, so this shouldn't surprise anyone.

load more comments (10 replies)

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Very rare Vietnamese W

[-] lledrtx@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

WDYM? Common Vietnamese W

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 6 months ago

They're not exactly known for human rights support.

On the other hand, they actually stopped a genocide in living memory, which is more than you can say for most nations.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

The whole country is corrupt, it's just so open and brazen. No one would be left alive if they did this to anyone guilty.

load more comments (12 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024

289 points (98.7% liked)

World News

38563 readers

2778 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.