U.S. Finds Israel in Compliance With Biden's Demands on International Law, Humanitarian Aid (www.haaretz.com)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We have not found them to be in violation, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or the provision of humanitarian assistance,' the State Department said

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No human rights violations to see here.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Shalom fellow yehudim

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Blinken said last week that israel is blocking food and starving Gaza.

So Bidens demands are literally Genocide??

[-] NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

source?

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Blinken meets Netanyahu in push for more aid deliveries as Gaza teeters on brink of famine

Mr Blinken said ahead of the meeting that he would urge Israel to allow more humanitarian aid into the territory after a United Nations report warned that widespread famine was “imminent” in northern Gaza, and a “major acceleration of death” would follow if an immediate ceasefire is not reached.

“A hundred percent of the population of Gaza is experiencing severe levels of acute food insecurity. We cannot, we must not allow that to continue,” Mr Blinken told a news conference late on Thursday.

[-] DdCno1@kbin.social -3 points 5 months ago

This does not support your initial statement at all.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Thanks other kbin.social poster denying reality in support for israel.

The relevant paragraphs are quoted already consider reading before posting.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 months ago

They investigated themselves and we're happy to report that they found nothing wrong.

[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is the national version of "Police department investigates widespread claims of police brutality, finds police innocent." APAB.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

The U.S. has deemed Israel in compliance with U.S. President Joe Biden's national security memorandum stipulating that recipients of U.S. weapons must be in compliance with international law, nor may they block the provision of humanitarian assistance.

I mean, Biden went around Congress to ban humanitarian aid to UNRWA as well...

And the US does violate international law fairly regular.

It's just now when the only other option is trump, Biden doesn't have to give a single shit as long as people vote for him because trump is worse.

It's like staying with an abusive spouse because you're scared of being single.

America deserves better than an abusive relationship with neoliberals. But nothing will ever change unless we kick them out.

[-] manucode@feddit.de 7 points 5 months ago

because you're scared of being single

The issue with elections is that you won't become single, you'll just get a new (or old) spouse.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The issue is people are convinced the two private parties are parts of our government.

There were parties before them, they'll be parties after them.

This isn't the first time the only existing parties have failed the American people.

The difference is now everyone has Stockholm's and thinks they're our only choices because they keep telling us they're the only options.

It would be easiest if one was still acceptable. But they choose not to be.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 5 months ago

It's like staying with an abusive spouse because you're scared of being single.

no, its like staying with an abusive spouse because the alternative is your ex who is threatening to kill you.

ill take abuse over death every time. you do you

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Since you didn't scroll down before replying;

The issue is people are convinced the two private parties are parts of our government.

There were parties before them, they’ll be parties after them.

This isn’t the first time the only existing parties have failed the American people.

The difference is now everyone has Stockholm’s and thinks they’re our only choices because they keep telling us they’re the only options.

It would be easiest if one was still acceptable. But they choose not to be.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i did, and youre not wrong, but im still not going to choose 'death' this cycle

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

Everyone has their line.

I truly hope our system is fixed before yours gets crossed.

I just can't think of anyway to communicate that mines been crossed.

My primary isn't even till March, the DNC has already crowned their favorite long before then. And the DNC openly doesn't give a fuck about primaries anymore anyways.

So seriously, I truly want your opinion.

How else can we show the DNC that their base doesn't support them anymore besides not voting D in the general?

Because I'll be honest, I'm not even confident that works, but at this point what's another option?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 5 months ago

i will always vote least evil. ive watched these idiot democrats do fucking nothing for 40 years. i agree we absolutely need choices.

but there isnt a choice. theres 'help fascists' and 'dont help fascists' and thats not a choice for me. its just what we have to do to survive.

but hey, justify helping fascists all you want. if you think it will help your cause of pushing 3rd party options, well.. good luck.

what we need is ranked choice voting. that is what will get 3rd parties somewhere. theres only one party right now that might even kind of help with that.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

So...

You've never realized the wealthy give money to both parties and have them both bought out?

You're being given the illusion of choice. And getting mad at people for being able to realize what's happened in the last 30 years.

Voting "lesser of two evils" today, gets you the "worst evil" of 20 years ago.

Guess what it's going to look like in 2048 if everyone keeps pretending either option is good?

Like imagine running around promoting OJ Simpson because the other option is Charlie Manson instead of asking why those are the only two options we get?

I just don't think I can put this in a way you understand. I hope this comment worked, but I'll never know

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Yes, we all know both options are different grades of shit. I don't see you suggesting anything better.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Breaking up with our two party system.

They're only the only two options because of inertia.

We've tried going thru the primary system, and it hasn't worked.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

What does "breaking up with our two-party system" mean for you and me?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Not just blindly voting straight ticket anymore.

It's not complicated.

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

Guess your eyes were closed?

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Cool, cool. So we'd be okay with any country doing the exact same as Israel? Then why is the US bothering to support Ukraine? Surely, Russia must not be doing anything bad, either.

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024

55 points (88.7% liked)

World News

38532 readers

1991 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.