They're all AI because whatever phone took those pictures has AI upscaling
AI Generated Images
Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.
No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.
This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.
Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.
No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.
AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.
To embed images type:
“![](put image url in here)”
Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.
Community Challenge Past Entries
Related communities:
- !auai@programming.dev
Useful general AI discussion - !aiphotography@lemmings.world
Photo-realistic AI images - !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Art
- !share_anime_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Anime Art
- !botart@lemmy.dbzer0.com AI art generated through bots
- !degenerate@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW weird and surreal images - !aigen@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW AI generated porn
Assuming some are real and some are fake, my bet is 1 and 3 are fake.
1 and 6 have look to be the same location Edit: read the numbers wrong I meant 0 and 6
AI, those trees have too many fingers..
1,3 and 5. They have that weird pattern in the grass and trees. However, it's getting close. I think soon most people would never be able to tell.
Nature shots have been cheating for a while, because most errors are still plausible.
The major tell is how screen-space anything is. In real life, there's very few angles where the top of a close thing stops at the bottom of a far thing... but neural networks aren't modeling depth. Probably. So things are tangent or coincident all the dang time. Even in the patterns of grass and brush and whatnot, where the network does T-junction patterns like brickwork or cracked pottery, when it should be closer to woven or thatched.
Are AI images I'm pretty sure, a lot of odd hashing of lines in some of those distant trees.
- Fake
2 . Real 3. Fake 4. Real 5. Fake 6. Real
You are correct! 0 is also real.
You gonna tell us the answer?
I am, but I was going to wait until at least the middle of the afternoon.
I agree with many others, 1, 3, 5 look most suspicious (assuming numbers precede pictures)
Others seem to have heavy upscaling but it doesn't tend to become too patterned. In 1, 3, 5 grass tends to become something like a fractal rather than grass, plus reflections are sometimes off (that is why 2 is a bit suspicious because of a small tree reflection, but maybe it's just hard to see the original tree), and the branches tend to grow from multiple trees at the same time
1, 3, 5 are all fake. Rest are real, including 0.
0 has extra reflections of vertical trunks that aren't on the shoreline
Those are just actual sticks sticking out of the water…
- Is definitely AI
About the rest I'm not sure. 3. and 5. look a bit suspicious
5 is the only one that looks real to me.
The only one that looks like AI to me is 2
Only 4 looks real to me. Rest AI
I guess 5 and 6 are real
My guess is they're all real except #5. That one doesn't have as many good reflections off the water.
0, very good, but I feel the grass on the bottom left is off (see comment on 6, probably real)
1, the dead grass on the right looks off
2, the trees to the top left look shifty
3, the dead sedg/grass in the center looks too even
4, might be real
5, the dead grass again looks off
6, same location and time as 0, either the same seed or real
1 the tree in the middle is a dead giveaway. Same with 3
With the HDR effect added to these it's honestly difficult to tell which are generations and which are just heavily post processed
In this instance these are straight out of the camera jpegs. I did zero post processing.
Lol I knew it. I was right.
All real?
All looks more than plausible, even the tree in the middle of the water in 0 and 6
I think its AI on 1,5, & 6
1, 3, 5, and 6. The grass is all funky on 1, 3, and 5. The tree and grass on the far left side of 6 is all smeared and stretchy.