this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
272 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2199 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States last week secretly shipped a new long-range missile system to Ukraine, and Ukrainian forces immediately used the weapons to attack a Russian military airfield in Crimea last Wednesday and Russian troops in the country’s southeast overnight on Tuesday, according to a senior U.S. official.

The United States previously supplied Ukraine with a version of the Army Tactical Missile Systems — known as ATACMS — armed with wide-spreading cluster munitions that can travel 100 miles.

But Ukraine has long coveted the system’s longer-range version, with a range of about 190 miles. That can reach deeper into occupied Ukraine, including Crimea, a hub of Russian air and ground forces, and supply nodes for Moscow’s forces in the country’s southeast.

Overnight Tuesday, Ukraine used the longer-range missiles to strike Russian troops in the port city of Berdiansk on the Sea of Azov, the senior U.S. official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters.

MBFC
Archive

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (23 children)

In a major policy shift, President Biden secretly approved the decision to send more than 100 of the longer-range missiles in mid-February

That is a big deal! I believe they were given 20 or so last year, and they were able to wreck a dozen of Russia's best attack helicopters with them, as well as several other, less flashy, targets. And that was with the shorter range variant, the article is saying they received the longer range variant this time!

Additional longer-range missiles were also included in the $60.8 billion of aid for Ukraine

More to come!

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Haha military industrial complex go brrrr

^(This is meant as a tongue-in-cheek appreciation of the USA actually doing some good with said military industrial complex, please don't get mad)

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If anything, Russia's embarrassingly bad military supply chain being exposed in this war reinforces the long held US policy to find every excuse to spend on continued military production.

Our manufacturers have stayed active as a result of the ongoing military industrial complex. Our ever rotating stockpile of military goods have kept our equipment modern and in good position, and our manufacturers ready to mass produce if we find ourselves in need.

I have been highly critical of wasteful military spending. But I have to admit that recent events have highlighted the value in our approach. It's still extremely wasteful, and our old military supply that gets phased out and sold off / gifted to police and foreign vassels do a world of damage. But if your goal is to be as ready for war as possible, it makes a lot of sense.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I have been highly critical of wasteful military spending.

Oh boy, Until Russia attacked Ukraine, I thought we were past the times where it was necessary too. Unfortunately I was wrong, but what's worse, is that when looking back, it's actually pretty clear that Putin was like this, with Crimea and other situations that easily added up to Putin being a war monger.

But what's even worse than this is that I see some similar tendencies from China. NATO really needs to stick together now, and Europe is beginning to step up to our responsibilities more now.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's Lemmy, someone's always mad. Don't worry, they're not your crowd.

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

What makes me really mad is this new drug called ecstasy, it makes me mad!

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Studio audience: How mad does it make ya?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This implies one of two things. Either these were sitting across the boarder, waiting for approval, or they were already there in a warehouse labeled “inexpensive potatoes” waiting for approval. It must have been so hard to wait if they were already in-country, but congress had to get off its collective elephant ass to approve the money for them.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Yet more evidence we could have done FDR's move. Leave them next to the border and forget about them. When Ukraine shows up with them you just shrug and go, "ah that's where those ended up!"

[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Clearly not so secretly...

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"secretly shipped" They got there and they got used. And we now read about it. Sounds like it worked?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 6 months ago

Yeah, pretty sure Russia knows all about it now that they've been hit 200km behind the front line.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

'Do that', Marje? I'm not a comic book president. Do you seriously think I would explain my master stroke to you if there were even the slightest possibility you could affect the outcome? I shipped it 35 days ago.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I read on Lemmy that is was a "secret". Promise not to tell anyone or this won't be a secret anymore.

/s

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago

We are reading this news right now so it is not secret anymore I guess...

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 3 points 6 months ago

I didn't see nothing.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The United States previously supplied Ukraine with a version of the Army Tactical Missile Systems — known as ATACMS — armed with wide-spreading cluster munitions that can travel 100 miles.

Overnight Tuesday, Ukraine used the longer-range missiles to strike Russian troops in the port city of Berdiansk on the Sea of Azov, the senior U.S. official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters.

Last Wednesday, social media accounts in Ukraine reported large fires and explosions at a military airfield in Dzhankoi, Crimea, which the senior administration official said was also a long-range ATACMS target.

In a major policy shift, President Biden secretly approved the decision to send more than 100 of the longer-range missiles in mid-February, the senior U.S. official said, as well as more of the cluster munition variant.

In praising the infusion of military assistance, including the new missiles, lawmakers and Mr. Zelensky have made no mention of the fact that Ukraine already received and employed a small number of the weapons, presumably to keep their use secret from Russia.

Still, many advocates of arming Ukraine have dismissed the Biden administration’s fear of escalating the conflict with Russia and have urged the White House to give Kyiv the weapons Ukrainian officials say they need to win.


The original article contains 972 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] june@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I notice the lack of ‘he’s not doing enough’ and ‘he’ll never do enough’ crowd here.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 6 months ago

Right here. I’m glad he’s doing this… finally.

Now if only he would stop doing it to Israel.

So, neutral attitude about the whole thing.

It’s like those people who say to look at the economy, like even if it was doing great because of him that doesn’t change that he is sending more and more weapons to Israel

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›