After the flight, the F16 stunned researchers by asking where it could find John Connor.
this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
58 points (93.9% liked)
News
23300 readers
3543 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Skynet saw humanity as a threat to its existence, which was writing to generate an exciting story and blockbuster success. This timeline is different, imagine half of humanity helping Skynet.
“I know now why you cry, but it’s something I can never do,” it said, before crashing into the sea.
What that means for war
Giant robot battles on the moon like I've been hoping for since I was 8?
Except the Nazis aren't hiding on the moon in this timeline, they're taking Earth from the inside.
Who says only Nazis get to have giant robots?
I mean, what else could possibly motivate humanity to have giant robot battles on the moon? Moon Kaiju? Come on, now.
I don't understand the question. Are you suggesting motivation is necessary for a giant robot moon war?
The AI models have one big advantage: they don't pass out at higher g forces.
Have all of the programmatic edge-cases been discovered for AI controlled flight?
Like what? I assume they set input maximums so that it wouldn't exceed the limits of flight.
Not if this is one of the first experimental f-16s.
Kendall remarked after the flight: "The flight was nice and smooth, but an AI voice kept screaming the whole time about how Megatron is a failure at leading the Decepticons."
Have they not seen the movie Stealth?
Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall told senators on Tuesday at a hearing on the service’s 2025 budget that he will enter the cockpit of one of the F-16s that the service has converted for drone flight to see for himself how the AI-controlled plane performs in the air.
“There will be a pilot with me who will just be watching, as I will be, as the autonomous technology works,” Kendall told the Senate Appropriations Committee defense panel members. “Hopefully neither he or I will be needed to fly the airplane.”
Doesn't this defeat the purpose of the drone? I thought the big advantage for AI/drone fighter jets was that it isn't limited by the humans inside (in regards to G forces and life supporting systems, not in regards to targets)
this isn't for production.
This is so they can test the AI with human Pilots as backups if anything goes wrong. They will then probably move on to tests without Humans in them.
Ah yeah I guess that makes sense
It's wild that this plane entered service 45 years ago and is still in service long enough to be retrofitted with self piloting AI.