this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
560 points (86.0% liked)

Memes

45886 readers
1397 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whileloop@lemmy.world 258 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the world is going towards simplified logos, gotta at least make yours good. Firefox did that. Can't complain.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 94 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wanna go back to medieval crests, where they would throw in symbology for every little detail about the family/guild/whatever. I wanna be able to know everything about a product/app just by looking at its icon.

[–] whileloop@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow I actually love this idea. There could be some common symbol in the crests to denote what kind of open source license they follow (GNU, MIT, etc), affiliation with other software, all sorts of cool stuff.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What happens when someone makes a fork of your crest?

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

God damn it. Here's your upvote.

[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Do like the Brits and just slap the smaller flag in the corner of the new flag

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 225 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

My favorite is the last one. Not the one on the left, but this one:

the Firefox logo used in 2017-2019

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

I am pro the paw.

[–] BattleBeetle@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't get the significance of the purple globe. The orange, yellow, and blue combination looks more vibrant and is just so iconic

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Global warming?

[–] craftyindividual@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a growng trnd f ovrsmplfctn.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] perdido 36 points 1 year ago

Man, I had forgotten how good this one was. The current logo is nice but this was peak Firefox.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

this one was perfection

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WildlyCanadian@lemmy.ca 185 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I love Firefox's new logo..

[–] tahoe@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I feel like it’s one of the best current logos. It’s simplified but not oversimplified and it looks really good.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] eochaid@lemmy.world 124 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I couldn't give two shits about a fucking icon.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

The only correct answer. This thread can be closed.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The old logo is too busy and doesn't look like fire. Ngl I like the new one, it feels like the fire is cradling the earth.

[–] victron@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In that color, that's clearly not the earth anymore

[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't look like earth in the earlier either. That land area look nothing like earth

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] halvar@lemm.ee 66 points 1 year ago

I think it's neat especially next to the new thunderbird logo. IMHO it still has character and is not oversimplified.

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow. I'm surprised at the dislike for the old detailed icon. Maybe it's being old enough to remember black and white icons, but I miss the increasing amount of colors that icons had for a while there. I hate the trend toward monocolor silhouettes.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

It is more the dislike of people hating on the new icon, like OP.

Either icon is fine, you may dislike one of the icons but at the end of the day it is just an icon.

You click it, it opens the software, and you move on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The original Firefox (originally called Firebird) logo be like:

[–] Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Oh, hence Thunderbird.

…Wait, where are Waterbird and Landbird ? Are they safe ? Are they alright ?

[–] pseudo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Originally called Phoenix, since it was Netscape Navigator, reborn.

But Phoenix Technologies disliked that, so they renamed to a descriptive name for the same immortal bird -- Firebird.

The Firebird database people would have none of that, so after a few-months gap between 0.x releases, they found the closest thing they possibly could which was not trademarked. It had nothing to do with the original name idea, fire being a weak link.

And we've been stuck with that stupid name for two decades.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's kinda crazy the whole reason we have Firefox is a company was crushed by Microsoft and said "fuck it, shit's open source now."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago

Every Firefox logo is a masterpiece. This one is no exception.

[–] Thormjolnir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

2004-2009 were the golden years... Although I'd gladly use it if it had the 2002 logo my reference

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

Nah, I like the new logo.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

"What happened to me? People care more about polished functionality than their privacy, and are willing to trade privacy for something that steals all their data as long as it is "faster," even though I'm arguably faster than Chrome at this point..."

Most regular ass people don't give one flying fuck about being owned by corporations, they're happy to get reamed by companies that don't give a shit if they live or die.

[–] callyral@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

i like this newer firefox logo

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago
[–] igorlogius@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Side by side the old logo looks nicer ... but i guess the simplified logo fits better into most desktop enviroments (out of the box), maybe since most other apps now also seem to use such designs.

[–] Catpuccino@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

I use the developer edition and it has a neat blue variant of the logo.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

I'm sure quite a few people can agree that we do not like the oversimplifying of logos. I know I sure as hell don't. The old logo was so much better looking if you ask me.

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The new one looks so much better than that overdetailed crap, I don't want a painting, I want an easily discernable icon. Also, I can't believe we're still doing Firefox so many years after its new logo debuted, especially since Thunderbird just changed their logo. In my opinion, it seems like people are just reiterating the same joke some bloke did without even looking up the why and how. And before you ask, yes I prefer the new Thunderbird logo too, it's much more discernable.

[–] julianh@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Firefox gets so much crap for the logo when it's probably the best minimalist logo there is. People just mistook the more general Firefox "brand" logo with the actual browser logo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gabe@literature.cafe 12 points 1 year ago

I miss the old firefox logo but new one is still really good in my opinion

[–] 34@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've been using Firefox since it was called Phoenix, just looked and it has been 20 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shadearg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

what happened to you

Near fifteen years, bræh.

Wait another fifteen.

load more comments
view more: next ›