this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
160 points (96.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6622 readers
296 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 63 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Funny thing about how clean Russia is. Moscow has a spotless city center, and anywhere important is super clean. But as soon as you step outside the usual areas, it's suddenly back to failed-state chique, with random crap just dumped outside of direct view and slowly spilling over.

[–] Maeve@sh.itjust.works 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ever visited underserved areas of the USA? We're talking furniture dumped in barely wooded areas.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You can call them rurals

They can't hear you here, they're all on Facebook

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

Hey now, I can hear!

I can also attest that it's true, it's just the reverse of the Russian situation. Instead of 20% functional and 80% shit, I lived in the 20% that's shit instead of the 80% that's functional. Getting out was priority #1 to me.

We... probably should do something about it.

One of the more disturbing incidents of my life was making a delivery with a friend to some private hunting cabin deep in Appalachia, and I mean, we're already IN Appalachia, so, DEEP. And we drove past, in the deep woods, the most awful, dilapidated shacks and decaying trailers. God, they were fucking piecemeal, and yet, very clearly still lived in. I remember being disturbed as we drove up to the steel and barbed wire fence on the road and getting buzzed in the last mile or so to the cabin, and getting there, and it was just this... villa. Like, you walk in and it's got a fucking chandelier. It's not a 'cabin' except in the loosest sense. They had private catering, a massive area of woodlands reserved for them, all of that.

I found the proximity... unnerving. Like a rich man eating caviar next to a starving beggar.

[–] Maeve@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Lol'd. I've seen it in sparsely wooded areas outside that serves as green space, in midsized cities as well, but yes, mostly rural/small towns.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 52 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Keep going, Ivan. You're this close to getting it.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So close. I've been wondering about ways we can push them over the line of realization. 500,000 dead hasn't done it. A few days ago they lost 65 artillery pieces in a single day. Sure there's lots of soviet production in mothballs but this shit has been going on for two years. How much longer can they go on before the average person realizes - oh shit - we're gonna lose this badly - ?

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

The 500k figure is casualties, not deaths. That includes wounded.

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

500k is shit for Russia. Lmao Russia got into the big leagues by throwing tens of millions into a meat grinder and still having fucking more ready to go. They're like ants that have been half drowned in vodka. Every one you popov gets replaced by 4 more.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Their impotent rage amuses me.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Less amusing since they started killing and raping civilians in Ukraine, but I agree. Something is just fascinatingly wrong with the mindset of this country

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't think a country can even have a mindset. Also, I'd guess that mindset might not be shared equally amongst all Russians

[–] palitu@aussie.zone 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

County mindset is called culture

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And assuming everyone thinks like that is called nationalism and jingoism, but we're getting a little credible here

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

But muh others and team sports

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 5 months ago

I'd say it can't possibly be true, but orcs

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 38 points 5 months ago (2 children)

IKEA makes loans for purchasing their uncomfortable furniture? Their sofas should be reviewed for human rights violations. They're not aspirational.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Remember, these are the people who consider Adidas tracksuits the epitome of fashion and a status symbol.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 5 months ago

Remember back in the '90s when everyone used to wear windbreakers? The Russians are just 35 years behind the times, they'll get here by about 2055

[–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

IKEA furniture are not bad at all. 40 years ago or was a standing joke, but the quality has quintupled since then.

You can of course buy the cheapest of cheap in IKEA and it will be less comfortable than the more expensive ones, but couches from IKEA are good.

Hell, most other furniture brands delivers their furniture flat packed as well. It's just easier to build IKEA since they have gotten the instructions down to a t.

When I saw the story about furniture doctor here the other day it just seemed so dumb. Buy flat packed furniture sand assemble it on your living room. Or get the furniture doctor to assemble it, then you don't have to cut it open with power tools....

In short - IKEA and Wasa ftw!!

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Poland is the China of Europe. Everything you can do, they can do cheaper.

Also, Poland is much less corrupt and the privatization in the 90s worked a bit better than in Russia, at least it didn't create a powerful class of oligarchs due to less mineral resources. Most of their major companies are relatively young though.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So they're angry that other people have it better than them and the solution is to make life terrible for all those people rather than demand something good of your own government?

I don't think Russian's a human. How on Earth do they think like that, if other people have it better than you, clearly the problem is with your country. Who comes to the conclusion that the problem is the other country.

Anyway imagine lusting after ikea furniture. Someone should tell them that we think it's all crap. That will really drive them.

[–] Metype@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

While this person's mindset here is reprehensible; try to avoid making sweeping generalizations based off a few encounters. It's destructive and can be quite hurtful.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I didn't make sweeping generalizations I'm making a comment based on what is visible in the text. I'm sure not all Russians are like this but I'm not talking about all Russians where did you get the impression that I was?

[–] PahassaPaikassa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Using russian as a prular and "they" instead of "this guy" or something, probably gave that idea.

[–] Metype@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I must have misunderstood then, my bad!

I don't think Russian's a human

This is clearly a typo of some kind and I interpreted it to the sentence "I don't think Russians are human". With the use of plural pronouns after this point, my misinterpretation caused the entire point of your comment to be warped which is how I came to the "sweeping generalizations" conclusion.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not a typo, they're referring to the individual Russian in the post: " [that] Russian [is] a human"

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Ah ok, I can see that. I read it the other way too

[–] vatniksplatnik@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Just say vatnik. It just means anyone who gobbles the Russian gov propaganda cock. Fuck this vatnik

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well, the explanation is a word which, curiously, is similar to the French word for "whore".

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Sorry, Marat, you're not Russian, you're a Tatar. And no one likes Tatars, especially in Russia.

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Its called getting money from big daddy EU

Edit: apperently some people missunderstood my comment. Im in no way saying that all their achievements are just eu. All Im saying that especially public infrastructure in poland is strongly substituted by eu. In a lot of cities you can't get on a tram without seeing the big eu logo. And thats not a bad thing. Thats exactly what the eu is for. To help each other out.

[–] OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago
[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 5 months ago

Now remove from those numbers the contributions of immigrants workers