this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
87 points (93.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9675 readers
530 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 97 points 5 months ago

Remember that the auto industry was so resistant to putting speed governors in cars 100 years ago that they invented the term Jaywalking as a way of blaming the victims of their manslaughter.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 53 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The one rule I would dream of seeing is soft speed throttling to ensure that cars and trucks stay a safe 3 second distance or more apart from each other. That should be relatively easy to do with basic distance sensing and calculations.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Fucking tailgaters. No idea why so few people seem to be aware of how dangerous and stupid it is to tailgate.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

No, No. You don't understand. They are great drivers, an accident won't happen to THEM!

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

They do understand but think that they are playing the statistics. "It can't happen to me" is the mantra of many drivers.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Don't you fucking understand, I HAVE to get to the liquor store 0.38 seconds faster or I'm going to start getting withdrawals!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

It is relatively easy. My 2019 Mazda3 does this already when cruise control is on. Its front manufacturer logo is a radar device, and there are a few more on the car. Making it full-time should be easy enough.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Duno about newer cars, but in a 2017 model bmw it tends to brake for parked cars quite often when using radar cruise control...

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Why would you be using cruise control around parked cars?

[–] FatLegTed@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Was going to ask the same question - cruise control is for open roads like motorways. Not around town. No wonder they had issues with it.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Cruise control is for when my foot needs a break. Especially when I'm speeding through school zones.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cars broken down in the side of the road

[–] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, you should be slowing down at least a bit when passing someone pulled over on the side of the road anyways, no? Just like going through a construction zone. It really depends on how much braking we're talking about.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There's often cars parked on the side of the road on highways in NZ... Its also incredibly useful in stop and go traffic and sometimes I'm too lazy to turn it off after the traffic ends, until it randomly brakes for a parked car 😅

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 months ago

Because it reduces reaction time? If you set the cruise control and cover the brake with your foot then you have a faster braking response than if you have to switch pedals first.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chocoladisco@feddit.de 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Cupra Born I drove the other day (don't own a car and rely on carsharing and rentals for my business) while doing deliveries for a catering event did this. It was really annoying driving in narrow streets with it braking for parked cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

My 2017 Volvo just warns me if there's a parked car in a curve, never had it brake automatically for parked cars no matter the scenario, so I guess it's just that BMW's system wasn't quite there yet at the time...

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ah true, yeah I test drove a polestar and a Hyundai ioniq 5 before deciding to go with the bmw and they both worked a lot better, but were also way more expensive since they were new and the bmw was second hand 😅

Unfortunately there weren't any second hand phev volvos available in my area at the time.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Ripe for abuse as all gaps will always be huge and trivial to weave through.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

That means it's the right call to make. Whatever auto industry is complaining about the opposite is beneficial to consumer.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 42 points 5 months ago (7 children)

So they want self driving cars, which do not brake for pedestrians and cyclists? Do I understand this correctly?

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They want dystopia. Ideally you should pay per door handle use. Pay by kilometer and horn sounds are extra DLC. If possible, you'd keep paying and wouldn't be allowed to change manufacturer and car for number of years so they don't have to be as competitive and innovative. If possible government should mandate each human should have at least one car.

Well, since most of it sounds stupid and exploitative, they take what they can. Rent a heated seat, extra for autopilot and other gadgets, etc. The rest they lobby like crazy pushing against EV, pushing against different zoning laws other than suburban sprawl. Etc. Hyperloop anyone?

[–] Branquinho 7 points 5 months ago

It stops cars. It stops innovation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

These rules are convoluted and near impossible to apply. Specific braking speeds for some objects compared to others? That requires reliable computer vision, which hasn't been demonstrated anywhere yet.

And those speeds? 92mph is 148kph! Why the fuck are cars even permitted to be capable of that when no road in the country allows it? And why would you want to introduce unpredictable braking scenarios at such speeds?

What is feasible is a speed limiter based on the posted limit, but that'd be too practical.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What is feasible is a speed limiter based on the posted limit, but that'd be too practical.

I have recently got a car that tells me the currently posted limit and it is frequently wrong. It misses sign posts and sometimes thinks that a signpost for a side road applies to you.

It also has a speed limiter and a button to set the limit to the detected speed which I use a lot but I wouldn’t want it to do it itself.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Okay but we can still run a max speed governor. Put it at 78, with that annoying beeping sound if you creep above 75.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Thing is like none of our roads are properly tested for the posted speed limits. Interstates can often go up to a 75 limit and regular traffic will go at 85 (because cops dont care til more than 10 over and that difference adds up on long trips) with some people going 90+.

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

The highest speed limit in the USA is 137kph or 85mph. 148 is not a lot higher, and people tend to be stupid.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

I haven’t read up on the new law but the EU already mandates that all new vehicles are required to have “advanced emergency braking”.

I wonder how different that actually is from the US law, or are the car manufactures making a fuss over something they are already doing somewhere else.

load more comments
view more: next ›