211
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 112 points 4 months ago

I wonder if she knows that it’s already illegal?

Or is she just salty that priests are the ones being arrested?

[-] Kellamity@sh.itjust.works 39 points 4 months ago

I think she does - the bill is about materials being sent home with kids from schools that include sodomy or grooming or the incredibly vague 'lgbt agenda'

It's designed so that instead of banning books individually, they can just sue for anything they don't like.

The headline makes it sound ridiculous - and in a way it is, of course - but it's potentially dangerous. I don't know how much sway her organisation has, if it's big or niche. Hopefully zero

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

Except that by "groom kids with sodomy," she means "teach them that queer people exist and that they're normal people."

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Yeah, there’s that.

They like changing definitions. Though, if we’re gonna talk about groomers, she’s more likely to be one than drag or LGBTQ, and it ain’t even close.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Definitely. You don't hear stories about drag queens committing sexual assault against children.

You hear a lot of stories of religious figures doing it though...

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

No she's just an idiot with an agenda. Her propaganda software is just stuck in a recursion loop.

[-] hudson@sh.itjust.works 42 points 4 months ago

What’s going on in her house…?

Every accusation is a confession…

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Butt sex I imagine. She kinda looks like a woman who is into some backdoor play.

Not judging, just observing. If she wants me to stop saying that all she has to do is stop thrusting her Christianity on the rest of us.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 6 points 4 months ago

To be fair, buttsex is like, the greatest once you get the hang of it.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I am sure Janet Porter would agree.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

I want a law that says that "men of the cloth" should be sentenced identically to "regular people" and that any attempts at shuffling those types to other churches should be abetting a criminal, again being pressed to the full extent of the law.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

Sodomy ? They are not having sex with the kids.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

She’s gotten teachers confused with priests.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 4 months ago

But the CrisCo leader said so!

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

I think the feds should get involved any time anyone grooms children for any sexual act. But I think her and I firmly disagree on where each counts

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Would it be morally wrong for me to make a donation to the Trevor Foundation in her name and send her notification of that fact?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 4 months ago

Once you've had the idea, it'd be morally wrong not to.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 22 points 4 months ago

Conservatives need to come up with a better tactic than banning things that are already illegal.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It is illegal, you're right, but they want to destroy the legal definitions of many things so that they can write new ones. So suddenly, teaching kids about how their bodies work becomes "grooming". Being anything other than a straight white Christian male makes you a "sex offender". Reading anything other than the Bible to kids is "indoctrination", and so on.

They've spent many years and billions of dollars studying the power of language and ideas. They have framing the issues from their perspective down to an art form. If you control what words mean, you control debate and democracy.

[-] Corvidae@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

How do we address the alphabet mafia? You know, the LGBTQRSTD. ...

STD? Maybe she thinks Gomorrah is a venereal disease?

[-] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago

She looks like a wax statue.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I don’t normally support making fun of people for how they look but… there is something about that picture

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Even the eyes look like those fake plastic ones

[-] GasMeterCrasher@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago

She looks like a member of Rockafire Explosion, the animatronic band.

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

She looks like she's visiting Mars for two weeks

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 4 months ago

She looks like she's wearing a human suit.

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Even worse is that she looks like a terribly done knock off wax statue

Probably is part wax with the amount of caked on makeup they're using

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago
[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wow really, stooping that low to follow and harass me on lemmy

Why is this so important to you ramble81

[-] Brutticus@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

The incessant grooming of our children will never stop until we lock up every single pastor and shutter every church in this country.

[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I read this as repressed fundie likes anal.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
211 points (97.3% liked)

News

23266 readers
3408 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS