"Project 2025 should scare every single American," Biden said. "It would give Trump limitless power over our daily lives and let him use the presidency to enact 'revenge' on his enemies, ban abortion nationwide and punish women who have an abortion, and gut the checks and balances that make America the greatest democracy in the world."

Remember less than 24 hours ago Biden said he wouldn't really care if trump won as long as Biden felt he "tried his best"?

Logical consistency is a big deal for Dem voters but Biden and the DNC keeps wanting to treat us like Republican voters who have the memory of goldfish and zero standards.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

It’s pretty goddamn baffling and more than a little bit infuriating, to be honest

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

Perhaps I'm mis-remembering account names, but it seems like every comment from you is trying to undermine progressive votes.

[-] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Yes givesomefucks is a propaganda account. You can downvote and move on.

[+] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For future reference, you can click on a username to see post history

Although, I feel like you were just looking for a way to insult me that you don't think will violate civility rules...

Since we're asking questions tho:

Why have I noticed most of the accounts saying we have to stay with Biden are from Australians?

It's just a super weird coincidence I've noticed, because I've started waking up every morning to a couple pro-Biden replies, and they're almost always from accounts that live in Australia but comment on American politics a lot

What's the deal with that?

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

I don't have any interest in insulting you... and pretty much just too lazy to read your comment history.

I can't speak for other Australians, bit I'm fascinated by US politics. It's an absolute shit show and it serves as a cautionary tale for the rest of the world I think.

As to why we're passionate about supporting biden... this is just supposition but:

Firstly voting in Australia is compulsory, so the idea of voting even if you're not really enamoured with the options is more palatable. That said, we do have preferential voting so it's not really the same.

Secondly the US is a close ally. US international policies are in many ways our own defacto policies. In some ways we would be burdened by a trump presidency.

Thirdly, and this is probably more "me" than Australians in general but I strongly believe that most conservative voters here are voting against their own interests for the wrong reasons, yet we seem to be leaning further and further to the right like everywhere else. I see criticism of Biden more or less the same way. They may be valid concerns but you still need the guy to win.

[-] willya@lemmyf.uk 0 points 2 months ago

Is it just a funny name or something? Like mine, I don’t live in the UK.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

I feel being willing to admit there is a severe problem is a bit more important than remaining consistent. Now if he goes back to saying, "So long as I did my best, then no regrets"...

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Go back to saying that?

When has he tried to take it back?

It's still out there because he meant it.

They're both true statement.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Biden probably doesn't remember saying that, to be fair.

[-] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

SLAMS!

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

🎵duhduh duh Let the boys be boys!🎶

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

SLAMMMMMMM-AH

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Sure thing, donny dipshit!

[-] aalvare2@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I’m interested in the sourcing of this image.

What are the page numbers referring to? If they’re referring to a document for Agenda 47, I have not found any such document. If they’re referring to the official Project 2025 policy mandate that I found here, then I don’t think the page numbers match up for at least some of the points raised.

Also, is there an original image without the page numbers, and if so where did that come from?

Tbh I suspect that this image contains misinformation, which would be a real bummer. I know at least that the pdf I linked already says some crazy stuff, not the least of which is suggesting an abortion ban, but it’s 922 pages so there’s a LOT of pointless fluff.

Edit, 922 pages, not 923.

Edit: I received a couple downvotes but no direct responses. Is that just bc I’m coming off as someone who’s defending Project 2025, or bc I’m lame for asking about sources and/or sweating the details, or some other thing?

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I'd like to see him actually physically slam his desk without wincing in pain or fainting.

I'd also like to slam every writer and author who continue to use the word "slam" over the head with a rolled up newspaper containing their article

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

After that watching that debate I doubt Biden is capable of slamming anything. But yeah fuck Trump.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

How much money do we need to collect to watch politicians actually slam each other?

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I’m not sure what that would look like, and I’m even less sure I want to find out

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure they ousted Madison Cawthorn for describing exactly this...

[-] Batman@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, if we're gonna go full Idiocracy, let's let the politicians start the first season of "Ow my balls!".

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You mean like when Trump got slammed in the WWE?

[-] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

Did he SLAM him good?!?!?

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Breaking Bombshell News Biden Slams some sort of moldy fruit...an old pumpkin maybe? BREAKING BOMBSHELL SLAM NEWS CONCLUDED!!

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I’d rather watch Biden pound Trump.

[-] m88youngling@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

Username checks out

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago

Gross...

[-] BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I'd rather pound Trump while Biden watches

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

OH, slam. That will teach him. 🤔

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024

262 points (93.4% liked)

politics

18888 readers

3435 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News