this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
438 points (99.1% liked)

News

23259 readers
3837 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yellowstone National Park officials say a gunman killed by park rangers as he fired a semiautomatic rifle at the entrance of a dining facility with 200 people inside had told a woman he planned to carry out a mass shooting

The warning from a woman in Yellowstone National Park came in just after midnight on July Fourth: She'd just been held at gunpoint by a man who said he planned to carry out a mass shooting — a random attack common in the U.S. these days but not in the Yellowstone region, let alone the park itself.

Rangers spent the next several hours trying to find the gunman before he showed up outside a dining area with 200 people inside. He shot a barrage of bullets with a semi-automatic rifle at a service entrance.

The rangers — including one who was wounded — shot back. Their rounds hit the attacker, Samson Lucas Bariah Fussner, 28, of Milton, Florida, who died at the scene in the busy Canyon Village tourist lodge area near the scenic Grand Canyon of Yellowstone.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 95 points 4 months ago (2 children)

She’d just been held at gunpoint by a man who said he planned to carry out a mass shooting — a random attack common in the U.S. these days

I don't have anything to add beyond repasting that. It speaks for itself.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Yeah that worries me a lot. I am heading to that same campground today my third year in the park. I had worried about bears, Bison, or falling or getting injured in a hike. This first year I worry about getting shot just trying to enjoy a vacation. Sick of the gun violence in this country. That no one in the GOP will acknowledge.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We also have pretty good BBQ, but...yeah. Fuck.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd be willing to trade the good BBQ for an end to mass shootings.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

Can we still have mediocre BBQ?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not much for 2A bullshit but homie...

You went to YELLOWSTONE to attempt a mass shooting.

Do you honestly think there is a soul that resides nearby that doesn't have wet dreams about taking someone like you down every night?

Good riddance.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 46 points 4 months ago (7 children)

There's a fair chance he knew that and wanted to die while killing as many as possible.

As you said, good riddance.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I believe this to be the motives behind most mass shootings. They know they are going to die.

It's about getting their name printed on newspapers, shown in the news, talked about for a few days before the cycle repeats.

We would be better served if the news simply referred to the shooter as "an assailant" and never say their names.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Absolutely. If they're killed during their crime they should be completely anonymous. No names, no 'manifestos', no reference to the sorts of communities they were part of online, no last words, just, 'they were a vile stain on humanity' and then forgotten. Obviously, if they live more will come out as they're prosecuted, but that should be minimized and once they're jailed they can be forgotten by all but those tasked with keeping them alive to serve their sentence.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stinerman@midwest.social 54 points 4 months ago (1 children)

he planned to carry out a mass shooting — a random attack common in the U.S. these days

Well they're not wrong, but it's kind of surreal to see it plainly said like that.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We seem to have a hard time grasping the idea that if you make it easy for people to obtain weapons that kill with the simple pull of a trigger, there are people who will kill a bunch of people with them.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 53 points 4 months ago (1 children)

~~gunman~~
*DOMESTIC TERRORIST

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Yeah, that's a strange use of words. I was like "oh, he just had a gun where he wasn't supposed to," but no, he was in the act of performing terrorism.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 46 points 4 months ago (4 children)

"Stand On Zanzibar" by John Brunner won the Hugo Award for Best Science Fiction Novel of 1969.

The story is set in the early 21st century; one of the problems caused by the rapid changes of the times is 'muckers.' A mucker is someone who has 'run amok' and is out to kill as many people as possible. In the book the preferred weapons were knives and swords.

Brunner based his novel on the works of sociologist Alvin Toffler, who coined the phrase 'future shock'

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The only shock from the future is how hard someone has to work to survive. Not thrive, not live, but just get by. The shock is learning that this hardship is caused by 4700 people on the planet who have more money than they can spend in their lifetime and want to ensure the system that grants them privilege at our expense. The shock is learning that the entire societal system is rigged against anyone and almost everyone.

The shock isn't the future itself. It's the state of the present.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 26 points 4 months ago

It's often useful to know what a term means.

In this case, 'future shock' meant that there would be people who couldn't/wouldn't adapt to the shift from the Industrial Age to the Digital Era. People who were fine with Tom Hanks wearing drag in his TV show lose their minds over drag forty years later. People who grew up getting vaccines in school suddenly decide that all vaccines are poison.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That was basically Orwell's 1984 though. The Proles worked hard all their lives just to scrape by and the Inner Party lived like kings and the Proles weren't able to stop them even if they wanted to, which they didn't because they were brainwashed into maintaining the status quo through control of the media.

Sounds quite familiar, doesn't it?

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

sounds like pretty much all of human history, no?

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I think life was a lot harder in the past

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yup humans are shit, I know that, but it doesn't make me wanna kill a bunch of random strangers. That's just insane.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bricriu@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've been thinking about muckers ever since I read the book back in the early 2000s. Wish more people knew about it.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you really want to depress yourself, read 'The Sheep Look Up." His take on environmental collapse.

[–] Bricriu@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Right now I'm reading The Little Dummer Girl by LeCarré, and it's plenty depressing already. But I'll put this on the queue.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Stick with happy stuff, imho.

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Amok", incidentally, is a Malay word referring to a seemingly random killing spree that would take young men sometimes. Americans occupying the Philippines would sometimes be attacked by Muslim swordsmen insurgents in a berserker state, which led to the concept of "stopping power" and the development of the Colt 45

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I remember having read that book but I absolutely don't remember the contents

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

I think it's worth re-reading. He uses a lot of cute writer tricks

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wyoming resident and frequent Yellowstone patron here. Everything about this screams suicide. The man did everything possible to announce his intentions, then chose to shoot at a service entrance. He knew that there is a 100% chance that someone, patron or ranger, in the parking lot would have a high caliber weapon handy.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

You can't carry a gun in a national park.

Edit: I'll be darned, you can carry in national parks.

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 10 points 4 months ago

Per the National Park Service Website. You are allowed to carry a gun in national parks; but notably you’re not allowed to take it into government facilities: “government offices, visitor centers, ranger stations, fee collection buildings, and maintenance”. Additionally, it is not allowed to discharge the weapon unless you have specific hunting licenses.

I don’t know what bearing this has on this tragedy, if any, but to facilitate civil discussion it’s best to have a shared understanding of the law.

[–] MostRegularPeople@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You can indeed carry a gun in a national park. The law was changed in 2013.

Edit: I am wrong. It was 2010.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Samson Lucas Bariah Fussner, 28, of Milton, Florida

Alarm bells blaring on that name/location alone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I know it's just personal experience, but I'm surprised I didn't hear about this sooner than today.

load more comments
view more: next ›