this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
94 points (83.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2423 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AsakuraMao@moist.catsweat.com 99 points 3 months ago (3 children)

A complete non-story. Putting Biden's message in only one place was the right move. Releasing in one place at one time prevents early leaks. Sadly Twitter is the most convenient place to put it.

And stop calling it X, that's some idiotic shit.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The white house has their own website, they should really release stuff like that on there, and people can then post the link to it on whatever social media they choose.

[–] OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can’t use it for campaign matters

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 11 points 3 months ago

Ah right, campaign website then, same point.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 months ago

The platform has changed fundamentally. Its not Twitter anymore. Its the Nazi bar.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm gonna deadname this one because Elon's an asshole.

Check Twitter.

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

As a trans person I condone this instance of deadnaming

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Refer them to Musk Chan? What an insult

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Ehh, it makes sense. This is thunderous news, and whitehouse admins are always leaky sieves. You can't share this beforehand at all except to likely a literal handful of people.

When its time for it to go public, you post it on what is sadly still the biggest network possible, so it hits all the airwaves at once. Once its posted, it becomes "the one and only" statement. They arent going to summarize it in an email that would clearly leak. They maybe could have copy/pasted, but I dont see this as a big deal.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone should be using "X" at this point. I sure as fuck am not going on some fascist oligarch network to receive communications from my boss or elected officials. They need to find something else.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it, either. The White House has a website, which is certainly a place they could announce it. Further, there's nothing stopping the government from hosting their own Mastodon instance, specifically for communications like that. Using X seems like an endorsement of the platform, and the person currently calling the shots.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Right, if they just published it on their own website, it would be all over the internet very quickly. I agree that government agencies should just run a Mastodon instance too. They don't need the reach of TwitX for anything. It's a dying, for profit platform run by a total scumbag who is currently trying to put his thumb on the scales for Republicans, why would the Biden admin use it for official announcements? Let someone else post it on 'X'.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While I agree it makes some sense to not warn the team ahead of time, pointing employees to twitter for an announcement like this is absurd. Like, how hard would it be to attach the same document to the very same email they sent out telling them to go to twitter?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Harder than linking, and possible that some other data is leaked in the documents, like metadata or some such. Any of that data would be leaked to the press.

I dont consider it difficult to copy/paste text into an email, so the singular link to twitter to is distasteful to me. No one on lemmy is going to like it because we all have strong opinions on consolidated social media, or else we wouldn't be here.

These are Whitehouse staffers though. They have Twitter accounts because they have to. It's a bit weird, but whatever. It got done.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, I can't say I blame him. I'm sure he feels pretty isolated or unsure of who he cares to trust in his normal circles right now after all the bullshit over the past few weeks. Better to get the statement out first instead of telling some staffers who might leak it immediately. He owned the moment, so good for him.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 months ago

The twitter post can go up before the email. There's no reason the email can't be direct.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 months ago

No one should be using shitter, certainly not as an official form of government communication.

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Telling Them to Check X

I didn't know Biden hid treasure somewhere in the world, and now he basically wants his staffers to be pirates looking for the X? Now this is getting a lot more exciting.

Oh wait, politicians can't have fun.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 3 months ago

That's some low-rent shit.