274
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Reagan was an extremist. He was just charismatic enough to make it charming. "The scariest words" bullshit really stuck, and he made it seem like the government was the enemy whilst running the government. Trump et al are just the next phase of the same process.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

Reagan bribed the Iranians to continue holding American hostages until after the election to improve his chances of winning. He’s a traitor.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You could run back to the '64 convention and the Goldwater campaign if you want to talk about extremism. But even that sells short how much of a frothing fascist-loving freak Eisenhower ended up proving himself to be by the time he handed the keys over to Kennedy.

If you want to talk about extremism, we can talk about Coolidge and Hoover - men who paved the road to the death of laisse-faire capitalism after presiding over the biggest pump-and-dump scheme yet seen in world history. Hell, Hoover's landslide defeat in '32 was a direct result of his absolute inability to admit he was wrong after a full term in office presiding over the Great Depression.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

And they're all incredibly unpopular for their insane behavior. Marjorie, Boebert, Gaetz...

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Along with the likes of the far-right media figures Alex Jones, VDare’s Peter Brimelow, and Milo Yiannopoulos, the white nationalist Richard Spencer was a prominent attendee that year, and he told the Washington Post that he and other extremists had enjoyed “one big, bourbon-fueled party” in unofficial side venues around the convention center.

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s main stage convention speech on Monday night was full of falsehoods and distortions about immigrants and LGBTQ+ advocates and dog whistles about “globalists”, and it featured a gratuitous assertion that “there are only two genders, and we are made in God’s image”.

Just weeks earlier, Robinson told congregants at a church in the town of White Lake that “some folks need killing”, apparently with reference to perceived political adversaries , such as those who espouse “socialism and communism”.

The Guardian reported this week that one such speaker, the California lawyer Harmeet Dhillon, was greeted with a barrage of hateful tweets from Trump’s far-right supporters after performing a benediction with a Sikh prayer the same night.

His Turning Point Action Pac’s event last month hosted the likes of Candace Owens, the rightwing commentator with a lengthening history of antisemitic remarks; the Pizzagate conspiracy theory peddler Jack Posobiec, who has extensive links to extremists; and Alex Jones.

Blocks away from the conference, the Heritage Foundation, one of the richest and most influential conservative non-profits, reasserted its comprehensive Project 2025 plan to remake the US government in the radical right’s image, spelled out in 922-page document first issued in April.


The original article contains 1,264 words, the summary contains 254 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
274 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18790 readers
2749 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS