33
submitted 1 year ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago
[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yes, but very different art from his comics.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's pretty much...sexually suggestive pics of some teen anime girl

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago
[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Well, for one, she’s never shown filling out a long-form 1040.

[-] DrQuint@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Well, now I have a couple commissions to make.

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

. . . or renting a mid-sized car.

[-] Chriszz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I have always found anime style character ages to be somewhat ambiguous

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Why care? Its not a person? Are people nowadays not able to distinguish between a drawing and reality?

[-] Chriszz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don’t really care I just find it hard to tell the age of a 16 year old anime character vs a 20 year old for example. They look the same. Children are different though and it’s pretty obvious when they’re a child unless they’re tall.

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah the distinction between the age of characters in their early 20s is pretty much nonexistent often. But as said its not even worth questioning it, the artist could roll a d20 for the age and it would be the same imagine regardless if the dice stops at 20 or at 1.

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.fmhy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Kinda weird to spend your free time drawing naked teenagers.

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

Its not a "teenager" its a drawing. It doesn't even look like a person.

[-] BingoBangoBongo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Your comments here are so terribly naive that I have trouble believing you are arguing in good faith.

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

Your comments here are so terribly naive that I have trouble believing you are arguing in good faith.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You seen how good AI art is getting?

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Thats not a drawing then... Its literally hyperrealism and trained with real people.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago

Looks that way but eh, with anime girls there's usually some backstory to pretend they're adults.

[-] TheMemorius@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

"She's actually hundreds of years old!"

[-] VulKendov@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

An argument could be made that they are petite framed 18/19 year olds, but they could also be like 14 for all I know anime styles are kinda weird like that.

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Its drawings... Not people, none of the drawings is old enough to qualify as legal age...

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

By that rationale you can justify drawing just about anything. Could be literal babies. Doesn't matter, not real people.

[-] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. It is. Its always just a drawing. Unless you can draw hyper realistic, they you could argue it perfectly resembles a actual person and therefore act similar to a photo.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Ugh.

Why.

Just why.

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it was hard to miss for a while.

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't sexual posts against TOS anyway?

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Nope, NSFW is allowed on that bot instance.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
33 points (72.6% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1629 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS