105
submitted 1 year ago by malloc@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Starting at $61K, lol. Quite possibly the ugliest piece of shit I have seen in awhile.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Izzy@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Apparently most Americans. I can't go anywhere in my tiny car without the vast majority of the parking being filled with behemoths like this thing.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 year ago

Holy shit, could you imagine getting a 2024 car with 16mpg.lol why?

[-] malloc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Got to compensate for those insecurities bro.

I mean, I am going to use it to tow my boat everyday AND drive my 8 person family around 24/7, DUUUH

[-] Redscare867@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You drive a more fuel efficient vehicle? What are you poor or something? /s

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You jest, but cars absolutely are a modern status symbol. To the point where getting a better car is the first thing the average American does when they make enough money to jump up a class. It's woven into the fabric of our society.

From the perspective of middle going to upper class, fuel economy is a staple of the class that still worries about paying for gas.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, if it was an Aston Martin, not a pile of shit that looks like a pig having a seizure

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Glifted@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Have worked on these. Can confirm they're terrible. Possibly one of the worst vehicles on the market

[-] drahardja@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Worst in what way?

Not trolling, actually curious.

[-] Glifted@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Biggest problem: I've seen several kill their own batteries. Like 3V across both main and aux batteries. That's not really recoverable without battery replacement.

General quality control is bad (I have to be careful not to give details here. I like my job).

Subjectively, I just don't like the vehicle. It's the flagship for everything wrong with the auto industry. It's too big, too heavy, handles like shit, too many things to distract you from actually driving the fucking thing.

[-] PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A friend of mine had a Wrangler Rubicon - built to drive straight up mountains, but never left a paved road in its life

At less than 5 years old, the oil pan rusted out. I live in an area that salts roads in the winter, but even 10 year old 80's cars back in the 90's didn't rust out that bad

[-] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago
[-] eth0slash0@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Can you name the truck with 4-wheel drive, smells like a steak, and seats 35?

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

I don’t even enjoy driving full-size trucks or SUVs. Though high up, they’re hard to see out of… the giant hood is on your way when off-roading and you can’t tell if you’re about to drive off a cliff. Can’t see children in front of the car, or anything behind it without a rear view cam. Poor stopping and turning, harder to park, terrible fuel economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hoomod@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The F150 is the best selling truck for 46 years straight

The F150 is also the most sold vehicle for 41 years straight

People like their oversized vehicles, price/mileage/etc be damned

[-] Zoidberg@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

People like their oversized vehicles, price/mileage/etc be damned

They can always put some stickers on fuel pumps and bitch about Biden and blame him for their bad decisions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

its legally incentivized, this video explains it really well and is my source.

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's also worth considering how much of those sales come from companies buying fleets of them. Slightly different monster than private consumers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Zoidberg@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

I love how JD Powell has a stupid award for everything (and they don't mean anything, they're just a stupid marketing company.)

Want to have a best truck award but don't have the best truck? Well, we can sell you a "Best Truck under 4 tons" award. Don't have the best truck under 4 tons either? We have a "Best truck under 4 tons under $45k" for you...

And it just keeps getting more ridiculous.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Best vehicle in class

Class of one vehicle

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Top of the line in utility sports,
Unexplained fires are a matter for the courts!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sizzling@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Going to the American version of the link required me to fill in a zip code... what kind of site are these people running?

[-] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They look for locations close to your zip because a zip doesn't reveal your entire address and your entire address isn't needed.

Then it gets an idea of your whereabouts and if you want to purchase a vehicle it looks at dealerships near you I think or if you order I think you can have it shipped to a dealership in your area.

I dunno, I don't buy cars.

[-] ShadowRam@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Saw one on the road.

"Wagoneer" is absolutely the top of my list for the STUPIDEST name for a vehicle. How that makes it out of any boardroom is just unfathomable.

[-] Rememo@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

The Wagoneer model started in 1963. Been around a LONG time. The classic models are actually pretty cool, but the 2024 is generic.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I recall renting a Grand cherokee in 2016 and being disappointed to find it was like driving a caravan in a lot of ways. Nothing like the older Grand and regular Cherokees I use to own.

The "new" Cherokee seems to be like a slightly larger Patriot clone. It's like the movie industry creating new movies with old names. The new stuff is usually not as good or completely different.

[-] Feliberto@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I agree Wagoneer is a stupid name, but I think Mitsubishi Pajero is worse, "Pajero" meaning "Wanker" in chilean spanish.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Amazon Fire TV built-in

okay, DAFUQ?

EDIT: ohh... its likely for your kid and not for the driver.

[-] An_Ugly_Bastard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] malloc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Or Cybertruck 😂

[-] Hoomod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The suv looks fine

The truck looks a bit wonky

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t even look “big” or “tough”. It looks obese.

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I live in a fairly high-income area, and almost everyone drives new cars. I've noticed a trend that all new cars have stretched out longer, and it really bothers me. It's just a very ugly trend.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Ugh... looks like rivian and range rover made an ugly baby.

How long until they start making these things the same size as buses? These vehicles getting bigger and bigger is sure gonna help ease traffic, and absolutely totally not occupy more space on the road for no good reason... ^^/s^^

[-] malloc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Have you seen the Hummer EV? 9,000 lbs fully loaded.

It’s close to a type A school bus which starts at ~10K lbs.

The smallest school bus is known as a Type A. It carries only 10 passengers and comes in at the lower end of 10,000 pounds. Type B buses can seat up to 24 people but are the same standard size as Type A. This leads them to weigh around the same as Type A buses

https://drivinvibin.com/2022/10/21/school-bus-weight/

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Oh hell no, that's heavy AF. I would not want to get hit by that thing!

[-] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

heavy with no crumple zones like a model T while going at modern speeds.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Seen em on the road around me. They're a throwback to the original jeep wagoneer, but yeah... Fuck how big and goofy these stupid things look.

$61k for 16mpg city?????? What the fuck?

[-] FrostbyteIX@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I definitely feel they're trying too hard to be Range Rover.....

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
105 points (81.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9579 readers
435 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS