this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)

games

20527 readers
382 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Starfield's art direction is painfully boring. I've ben watching friends play. It looks like a totally soulless, characterless distillation of every forgettable science fiction movie in the last 30 years. It sure does look NASA, and NASA doesn't have an artistic vision, they just slap shit together in whatever way won't explode. The menus, the costumes, the weapons, even the planets, just look painfully generic. Like congrats, Todd, you successfully executed the NASA part alright. There's no way you could have made more intensely bland, vague, inoffensive rendition of space. There's no "punk" anywhere to be seen, though.

: p

I can't believe they made this shit instead of TES Six. It's like every 2010s space show that got cancelled half way through the first season.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tangentially, I consider NASA to be an integral part of the US Military Industrial Complex and I find the English-speaking left's somewhat uncritical embrace of it to be strange.

I mean, I get it. NASA is civilian and much of its work is exploratory and non-military, but let's not pretend against all evidence that all of its discoveries are being fed directly into missile development or dual use shit like GPS.

I think we should be at least as critical of NASA as Boston Robotics or any of the other MIC adjacent companies who do civilian work but with extremely obvious military applications.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

NASA's public image is so cool and wholesome. Pictures of entire rooms of engineers erupting in cheers when their ship successfully soft-lands on a distant world and it's telemetry comes back green across the board. Smiling astronauts in their iconic space suits fussing with robot arms and deploying satellites. As long as you never think about how the space shuttle's entire design was dictated by demands that it be able to deploy nuclear weapons it seems like a great institution.

NASA is just as bad as any other US institution. The reason it's funding has been cut so drastically is that it isn't needed for PR against the Soviets anymore, and because weaponizing space is mostly handled by other agencies.

[–] 1nt3rd1m3nt10n4l@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tangentially, I consider NASA to be an integral part of the US Military Industrial Complex and I find the English-speaking left's somewhat uncritical embrace of it to be strange.

My answer is: People like Star Trek, and want a thing like that IRL.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Except if it's Americans exploring the stars, every colony will be established by biowarfare against the natives and then populated by involuntary transfer of slaves and indentured servants so... yeah...

[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

kerbal space program is true nasapunk i-think-that

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

It reminds me of the Saints Row reboot in the way that it advertises infinite possibility but isn't really "about" anything. It is a sandbox in a much purer sense than most games in how thoroughly pointless and artless it is.

[–] Vingst@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they started working on this game in 2015

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Rdr2 was made in 7 years

sounds like fallout 4

also it's not even that nasa, yeah the space suits are bulky but that's about it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›