this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
205 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 87 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nikki Hayley is an opportunist. She sees Trump potentially losing and is shifting herself into a position of plausible deniability. If Trump were doing better she'd be completely on his side like she was when she was his spokeswoman. She knows he won't live until 90 and is positioning herself to become more powerful in the republican party.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that basically a skill set in the Republican Party?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Most politicians, really, but the Republicans have distilled the narcissism and made it the core foundation of the party. That's why you'll occasionally find a Democrat or third party candidat being a self-serving sycophant, but it doesn't mean both sides are the same.

[–] GunValkyrie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

They play both sides so they always come out on top.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I give it a day until Trump attacks Nikki, if that

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I were a betting man, I'd say Trump is going to confuse Haley and Harris again.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago

He confused Haley with Pelosi first.

Then I think the "first she was indian" was clearly confusion with Nikki Haley, who is Indian, with Harris, who is mixed black/Indian.

Then there are his other rambles which he seems to confuse them. Trump gets confused a LOT.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

frog tells scorpion not to sting.

[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

She's not french is she?

I kid of course

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This phenomenon is known as “phantom soul”. It’s when sometimes you still feel your soul, even though you had it amputated for political gain years ago.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This implies that they once had a soul to begin with.

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

She was probably a lovely person before she got addicted to power. It happens very gradually.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

Maybe you shouldn't have endorsed him.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 4 months ago

Honey, whining is all he knows how to do

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Shockingly, she's right about something.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 60 points 4 months ago

It happens occasionally.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 25 points 4 months ago

"They don't want a former president talking about the past"

Telling the "Make America Great Again" guy to stop focusing on the past... lmao

He literally tried to rebrand MAGA to KAG (Keep America Great) in 2020, and it didn't stick.

One of the fundamental tenets of Conservatism (at least before Trump), as it relates to Liberalism is to be staunchly resistant to change.

You can't be forward-thinking if your primary goal is to maintain the status quo. Doubly so if your whole campaign is about rolling back the clock and returning to the ways of a former era.

Kamala is campaigning on a future that could exist. Trump is campaigning on a version of the past that never existed.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Nimarata, your entire party decided to fully back a con man grifter insurrectionist with overt dementia. He is a vain clown obsessed with crowd sizes and other superficial shit. He has always been this way. He was too vain to wear PPE and turned a nonpartisan crisis into a wedge issue because of it. He was this way when you personally endorsed him, Nimarata.

[–] thegr8goldfish@startrek.website 9 points 4 months ago
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

babies whine if they don’t have something to suck on

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nimarata is pissed! This is what you signed up for gurl. Yes, I'll dead name her. No respect for Haley.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not what deadnaming is, but OK. She's still Nimarata, she just goes by Nikki because it works in all time zones.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I know what dead naming is, I was trying to be funny. I guess some didn't get the joke

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago

I got you, don't worry.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 months ago

Who cares what this batshit lady says? No one. But we do want her voters. Still, fuck her in the ear.