91
im no statistician, but im p sure that deviation is not due to random error
My hunch is, they’re prioritizing collection/analysis/reporting of new hiring information, while firing data gets backburnered. So it’s not until the audit way down the line that they go “oopsies, we over reported by 30%.”
p95 sure?
They've been doing this for a while now, but they always overreport by too much and the corrections after the fact get more notice than usual.
Or when they reported that healthcare inflation is like negative 20% last year to keep the already gamed inflation numbers look lower than they were.
I noticed that as well, the initial numbers get a lot more coverage and this creates an illusion that the economy is doing great. And then they just do plain old gaslighting on top of that such as this gem https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/12/59percent-of-americans-think-the-us-is-in-a-recession-report-finds.html
Everyone did intentional overreporting of the numbers in the past, but this only became a real problem with the Biden admin, because they are going too crazy with it. If they overshot by like 250k, this wouldn't get any real headlines, it would just be a quiet correction.
I think it's that and the fact that they've kicked the can as far down the road as they can at this point. It's becoming impossible to pretend the economy is doing well now.
Really, it shouldn't be about "jobs" but "amount of waged work hours against avg rent, food, transport, healthcare"
obligatory Marx
I think this guy might have been onto something.
Bidenomics, baby!
this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
91 points (98.9% liked)
news
23409 readers
835 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS