176
submitted 1 year ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

Warning: Crash video autoplays in article.

A pilot died during a gender reveal party when his plane crashed after dispersing pink smoke in the air above the gathering.

A video posted online shows a couple standing in front of a large lit up sign reading “Oh Baby,” before capturing the pilot flying low to the ground while releasing the pink smoke above the pair in San Pedro, Mexico. Just after flying over the couple, the plane’s left wing quickly snapped and the aircraft spiraled out of control and crashed in a nearby field.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 92 points 1 year ago

How many times does God need to tell us that gender reveal parties have to stop before we listen?

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

i don't believe they are a real thing

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 67 points 1 year ago

Gender reveal parties were a mistake. The woman who started them had miscarried every time before, so was celebrating every little milestone of her pregnancy, but people took the idea and started using it as excuse to show off and try to one up other folks.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I don't mind people doing whatever they want but a lot of them are just not to my liking, but neither are Tupperware parties...I just don't care about either.

A lot of these end up as headlines though, I feel that those involved would likely be headline regardless. In this case it is just unfortunate.

[-] Aliendelarge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Tupperware also carries the stench of MLM with it. Too bad since its generally pretty solid stuff. Waiting to find out the gender until birth was an interesting social experiment for my wife and I. It bothered some people more than we expected and others less.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That’s like a prompt to a twilight zone episode. 😬

[-] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 year ago

They dont know what happened? That pilot used a crop dusting plane to do a strafing run, realized he was headed nose first into some palm trees and yanked up on the yoke. He sheered the wing straight off his plane and died for the mistake.

[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Sure that’s what caused the crash, but why did the wing snap? It didn’t look like the plane was in overspeed, and the airframe should be able to sustain any input maneuvers under normal flight conditions.

[-] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

the airframe should be able to sustain any input maneuvers under normal flight conditions.

Let me frame it this way for you, my car's pretty reliable, but at high speeds I know that making a hard turn will end in catastrophe.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

This is a crop duster, not a stunt plane. It's not designed for that maneuver, so if you try, wings snap off. Iow, not normal flight conditions. Unlike civil engineers, you can't slap a factor of safety of 10 on an airplane. It won't fly.

[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I think you’re underestimating his speed and overestimating the strength of airframes. Most planes can easily get to speeds where inputs can exceed structural limits under normal flight conditions. There is even a V speed for it, Va or maneuvering speed. A quick google suggests that Vne, or “never exceed” for the PA 25 is -35 knots and Va is 104 knots. Now I have never flown one and I haven’t completely verified them but they sound about right. At 104 knots he can over G the airframe. Assuming a standard safety factor of 1.5 and a g limit of 3.8 (basic assumptions but I can’t find actual data for the PA25) and at max weight you can expect severe structural damage with full control inputs at 127 knots. If he wasn’t carrying that much and was lighter that number comes down as well. Finally, there’s the fact that it was a crop duster in Mexico so who knows what the maintenance history and actual condition of that wing spar was. Either way, even if it was in top form hitting 130 knots on a show boating low pass isn’t that crazy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whataboutshutup@discuss.online 30 points 1 year ago

Imagine learning in your teens that your gender is a pink-smoking plane crash claiming a pilot.

[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I remember the good days when things were simple, when you were either an Apache Attack helicopter or you weren't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Now if the child end up being trans it would have been for nothing

[-] whataboutshutup@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

Transition may be unconventional, involving means of trans-portation and what-nots.

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Equivalent exchange. You’ve got to take a life to make a life.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago
[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, gender is a separate thing now.

[-] Tatters@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

I assume that the jet pictured in the original post has nothing to do with the plane that crashed?

[-] billygoat@catata.fish 4 points 1 year ago

You would be correct. It was a single prop.

[-] BeefDaddySupreme@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nice click bait picture The Hill

[-] Random_user@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Was just about to point out they could have taken any of the 1000 frames from the video of the actual incident but instead chose a stock photo.

[-] computergeek125@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They also had an option to use a stock photo of the actual aircraft type on the ground.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Why is the image for this article a passenger jet plane? The actual airplane that folded like paper mache was a tiny single engine propeller plane

[-] itsdavetho@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It was a boy.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Well at least she gonna be pooping out a replacement soon.

Seriously though, just get a cake with a pink or blue frosting layer hidden under the fondant line a civilized person. Or go with green just to fuck with everybody lol.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Or go with green just to fuck with everybody lol.

"Congratulations, it's a ninja turtle!"

[-] MONDY@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Is there a place to see how many lives gender reveal parties have claimed?

[-] Vupperware@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not much to report on here… until you can explain why the wing snapped.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Seems like the wing snapped because he pulled up too hard with a plane that wasn’t designed for it.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

my guess is it wasn't maintained properly as well. that wing definitely failed because he pulled up harder than he should have, but it may have been due to material fatigue as a contributing factor.

either way... the pilot is probably the guy that maintains it.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

oh great, gender reveal plane crashes

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

You've gotta be fuckin kidding me.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

That plane looked like it was made out of cardboard and duct-tape.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Jesus, is that made out of paper mache?

Jesus: sí.

[-] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If you look at the ground, an air cannon blasts smoke and confetti right below where the wing snaps upward.

My guess is there was already upward force on the wing when doing the low pass, and the air cannon burst collided with the airstream.

The timing is too perfect for it to be unrelated. Fuck your babies gender.

[-] Plibbert@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk that air cannons at a different angle. My money is on poor aircraft maintenance coupled with pilot error of pulling up too quickly with too much speed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WillardHerman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Joyboy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Legit looked like that plane was something the wright brothers made

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
176 points (95.8% liked)

News

23287 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS