392

But it's free (i.imgur.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 44 points 2 weeks ago

Careful everyone, that’s actually a Wireshark!

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

You just VPN through the shark and it’s fine

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Arent there many cases of VPN leaks?

Also, when using a public VPN, because of shitty services you need to split tunnel a ton.

Once ReThinkDNS is ready, this could be done to a home router at least. But setting up DynDNS or even a domain is not scaleable at all, to normie people.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

There are many problems with VPN on public networks. Here's an example https://www.fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-170

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

That one can be bypassed by using an own DNSSEC or DOT DNS provider I think.

This makes "compliance" captive portals even more annoying... in Germany, every public network has one, so that people accept that they are not responsible for whatever and log MAC addresses and whatever.

This requires to use DHCP advertised insecure DNS, great!

[-] RustyNova@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

Wireshark! Do do do do do! Wireshark !

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

The WiFi lines on the eye really put a bow on it

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I can't believe I missed that.

[-] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Aren’t those gills? But yes, nicely worked into the graphic

[-] thenextguy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

WiFi = Wireless Fish

[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yup, public wifi are dangerous
I remembered back then when i still crazy, i planted Wireshark script in uni access point & guess what happened next....bunch of my friends accounts got stolen by me

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 12 points 2 weeks ago

Aren't most connections protected by https now, meaning they're largely fine?

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I feel like just enforcing https in your browser when on sketchy wifi would solve this problem, I don't think there are that many unencrypted protocols people use for sensitive info these days